Using Critical Incidents in Workshops to Inform eHealth Design
Demands for technological solutions to address the variety of problems in healthcare have increased. The design of eHealth is challenging due to e.g. the complexity of the domain and the multitude of stakeholders involved. We describe a workshop method based on Critical Incidents that can be used to reflect on, and critically analyze, different experiences and practices in healthcare. We propose the workshop format, which was used during a conference and found very helpful by the participants to identify possible implications for eHealth design, that can be applied in future projects. This new format shows promise to evaluate eHealth designs, to learn from patients’ real stories and case studies through retrospective meta-analyses, and to inform design through joint reflection of understandings about users’ needs and issues for designers.
KeywordsMethod Workshop format Design Development eHealth Critical incidents Stakeholders Reflective practice Evaluation
The authors would like to thank the other people involved in the workshop: Åsa Cajander, Koen van Turnhout.
- 2.Axelsson, K., Melin, U., Lindgren, I.: Exploring the importance of citizen participation and involvement in e-government projects: practice, incentives, and organization. Transforming Gov. People Process Policy 4(4), 299321 (2010)Google Scholar
- 3.Cajander, A., Grünloh, C., Lind, T., Scandurra, I.: Designing eHealth services for patients and relatives: critical incidents and lessons to learn. In: Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, NordiCHI 2016, p. 130. ACM, New York (2016)Google Scholar
- 6.Fook, J., Gardner, F.: Practising Critical Reflection: A Resource Handbook. McGraw-Hill Education (2007)Google Scholar
- 10.Kane, B., Toussaint, P.J., Luz, S.: Shared decision making needs a communication record. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Support for Cooperative Work (CSCW), pp. 79–90. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
- 12.Lee, E.: Identifying key components of services in healthcare in the context of out-patient in Norway. In: HEALTHINF 2017 - Proceedings of the International Conference on Health Informatics (2017)Google Scholar
- 17.NordiCHI 2016 Program Committee: Call for Workshop Proposals (2016). http://www.nordichi2016.org/participate/workshops/, archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6nmrcMFe5
- 19.Rexhepi, H., Åhlfeldt, R.M., Cajander, Å., Huvila, I.: Cancer patients’ attitudes and experiences of online access to their electronic medical records: A qualitative study. Health Inf. J., 1–10 (2016). doi: 10.1177/1460458216658778
- 20.Scandurra, I., Holgersson, J., Lind, T., Myreteg, G.: Development of patient access to electronic health records as a step towards ubiquitous public ehealth. Eur. J. ePractice 20, 21–36 (2013)Google Scholar
- 21.Schön, D.A.: The Reflective Practitioner. Basic Books, Inc., New York (1983)Google Scholar
- 24.Terry, N.P.: Protecting patient privacy in the age of big data. UMKC Law Rev. 81, 385 (2012)Google Scholar
- 25.Webb, R., Currie, M., Morgan, C., Williamson, J., Mackay, P., Russell, W., Runciman, W.: The Australian incident monitoring study: An analysis of 2000 incident reports. Anaesth. Intensive Care 21, 520–528 (1993)Google Scholar