Advertisement

Prynth: A Framework for Self-contained Digital Music Instruments

  • Ivan FrancoEmail author
  • Marcelo M. Wanderley
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10525)

Abstract

Digital Music Instruments (DMI) are usually composed of a gestural controller connected to a general-purpose computer. Recent developments in embedded computing facilitate new self-contained designs, where gestural interface and processing unit are integrated. These new instruments are possibly more focused on the musical activity, while maintaining many of the technical and creative capabilities of computer systems. In this context we have developed Prynth, a framework for rapid development that addresses important technical and usability features to support self-contained instruments. We also present “The Mitt”, an instrument with a tangible interface that captures high-resolution finger gestures and a first test of an implementation using the Prynth framework.

Keywords

Digital music instrument Embedded systems Granular synthesis BeagleBone Black SuperCollider 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Gratefully acknowledges the financial support from the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology.

References

  1. 1.
    Berdahl, E., Ju, W.: Satellite CCRMA: a musical interaction and sound synthesis platform. In: Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, pp. 173–178, Oslo, Norway (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Franco, I., Wanderley, M.M.: Practical evaluation of synthesis performance on the beaglebone black. In: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, pp. 223–226, Baton Rouge, USA (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hollinger, A., Thibodeau, J., Wanderley, M.M.: An embedded hardware platform for fungible interfaces. In: Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference, pp. 26–29, New York, USA (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hunt, A., Wanderley, M.M.: Mapping performer parameters to synthesis engines. Organ. Sound 7(02), 97–108 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Krefeld, V., Waisvisz, M.: The hand in the web: an interview with Michel Waisvisz. Comput. Music J. 14(2), 28–33 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Malloch, J., Birnbaum, D., Sinyor, E., Wanderley, M.M.: Towards a new conceptual framework for digital musical instruments. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Digital Audio Effects, pp. 49–52, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Miranda, E.R., Wanderley, M.M.: New Digital Musical Instruments: Control and Interaction Beyond the Keyboard. A-R Editions, Inc., Middleton (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Norman, D.: The Design of Everyday Things Revised and Expanded Edition. Basic Books, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Ryan, J.: Effort and expression. In: Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference, p. 414, San Jose, USA (1992)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Saito, T., Maruyama, T., Hoshino, T., Hirano, S.: A music synthesizer on FPGA. In: Brebner, G., Woods, R. (eds.) FPL 2001. LNCS, vol. 2147, pp. 377–387. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). doi: 10.1007/3-540-44687-7_39 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schacher, J.C.: Davos soundscape, a location based interactive composition. In: Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, pp. 168–171, Genova, Italy (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
    Wawrzynek, J., Mead, C., Tzu-Mu, L., Hsui-Lin, L., Dyer, L.: VLSI approach to sound synthesis. In: Proceedings of the 1984 International Computer Music Conference, San Francisco, USA (1984)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wessel, D.L.: Instruments that learn, refined controllers, source model loudspeakers. Comput. Music J. 15(4), 82–86 (1991)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vertegaal, R., Ungvary, T., Kieslinger, M.: Towards a musicians cockpit: transducers, feedback and musical function. In: Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference, pp. 308–311, Hong Kong, China (1996)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zappi, V., McPherson, A.: Design and use of a hackable digital instrument. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Live Interfaces, pp. 208–219, Lisbon, Portugal (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IDMIL/CIRMMTMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations