Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Flood Risk Management Strategies and Governance pp 3–23Cite as

Researching Flood Risk Governance in Europe

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Flood risks in European countries are increasing due to urbanisation and the consequences of climate change. To address these increasing risks, several countries are attempting to diversify their portfolio of flood risk management strategies. Besides improvement of flood defences, the strategies of pro-active spatial planning; flood mitigation, flood preparation and recovery are prominently on the agenda. Governance and legal scholars have engaged with flood risk management, but only in a fragmented manner and without adopting a comparative approach, leaving crucial questions on how to govern towards resilient, efficient and legitimate flood risk governance underexposed. The book of which this chapter forms the introduction provides an overview of the main results of the EU FP7 project STAR-FLOOD (2012–2016). This was a multi-disciplinary project involving governance and legal scholars. It made a comparative analysis and evaluation of flood risk governance arrangements in Belgium, England, France, the Netherlands, Poland and Sweden in order to derive design principles for appropriate and resilient flood risk governance. The chapter sets the scene by substantiating the relevance of adopting a governance and legal perspective on FRM. It furthermore explains the main features of STAR-FLOOD’s research approach in some detail, highlights connections with relevant existing literature and provides a reading guide to the forthcoming chapters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aerts JCJH, Botzen W, Van Der Veen A, Krykow J, Werners S (2008) Dealing with uncertainty in flood management through diversification. Ecol Soc 13:41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander M, Priest S, Mees H (2016a) A framework for evaluating flood risk governance. Environ Sci Policy 64:38–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander M, Priest S, Micou AP, Tapsell S, Green C, Parker D, Homewood S (2016b) Analysing and evaluating flood risk governance in England – enhancing societal resilience through comprehensive and aligned flood risk governance. STAR-FLOOD Consortium, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfieri L, Burek P, Feyen L, Forzieri G (2015) Global warming increases the frequency of river floods in Europe. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 19:2247–2260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arts B, Van Tatenhove JPM (2006) Political modernisation. In: Institutional dynamics in environmental governance. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 21–43

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barredo JI (2007) Major flood disasters in Europe: 1950–2005. Nat Hazards 42:125–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer S, Biermann F (2011) Towards adaptive management: examining the strategies of policy entrepreneurs in Dutch water management. Ecol Soc 16:5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bubeck P, Kreibich H, Penning-Rowsell EC, Botzen WJW, De Moel H, Klijn F (2015) Explaining differences in flood management approaches in Europe and in the USA – a comparative analysis. J Flood Risk Manag. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12151

  • Caldwell R (2003) Models of change agency: a fourfold classification. Br J Manag 14:131–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaffin BC, Gosnell H, Cosens BA (2014) A decade of adaptive governance scholarship: synthesis and future directions. Ecol Soc 19:56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Den Uyl RM, Driessen PPJ (2015) Evaluating governance for sustainable development – insights from experiences in the Dutch fen landscape. J Environ Manag 163:186–2031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieperink C, Hegger DLT, Bakker MHN, Kundzewicz ZW, Green C, Driessen PPJ (2016) Recurrent governance challenges in the implementation and alignment of flood risk management strategies: a review. Water Resour Manag 30:4467–4481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driessen PPJ, Hegger DLT, Bakker MHN, Van Rijswick HFMW, Kundzewicz ZW (2016) Toward more resilient flood risk governance. Ecol Soc 21:53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ek K, Pettersson M, Alexander M, Beyers JC, Pardoe J, Priest S, Suykens C, Van Rijswick HFMW (2016b) Best practices and design principles for resilient, efficient and legitimate flood risk governance – lessons from cross-country comparisons. STAR-FLOOD Consortium, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Ek K, Goytia S, Pettersson M, Spegel E (2016a) Analysing and evaluating flood risk governance in Sweden – adaptation to climate change? STAR-FLOOD Consortium, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Chang 16:253–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:441–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society – outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press, Berkeley/Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilissen HK, Alexander M, Beyers JC, Chmielewski P, Matczak P, Schellenberger T, Suykens C (2015) Bridges over troubled waters: an interdisciplinary framework for evaluating the interconnectedness within fragmented domestic flood risk management systems. J Water Law 25:12–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilissen HK, Alexander M, Matczak P, Pettersson M, Bruzzone S (2016) A framework for evaluating the effectiveness of flood emergency management systems in Europe. Ecol Soc 21:27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goytia S, Pettersson M, Schellenberger T, Van Doorn-Hoekveld WJ, Priest S (2016) Dealing with change and uncertainty within the regulatory frameworks for flood defense infrastructure in selected European countries. Ecol Soc 21:23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guha-Sapir D, Hoyois P, Below R (2013) Annual disaster statistical review 2012: the numbers and trends. CRED, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer M, Versteeg W (2005) A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: achievements, challenges, perspectives. J Environ Policy Plan 7:175–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann T, Driessen P (2017) The flood risk management plan: towards spatial water governance. J Flood Risk Manag 10(2):145–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegger DLT, Driessen PPJ, Dieperink C, Wiering M, Raadgever GT, Van Rijswick HFMW (2014) Assessing stability and dynamics in flood risk governance: an empirically illustrated research approach. Water Resour Manag 28:4127–4142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegger DLT, Driessen PPJ, Wiering M, Van Rijswick HFMW, Kundzewicz ZW, Matczak P, Crabbé A, Raadgever GT, Bakker MHN, Priest SJ, Larrue C, Ek K (2016) Toward more flood resilience: is a diversification of flood risk management strategies the way forward? Ecol Soc 21:52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huitema D, Lebel L, Meijerink S (2011) The strategies of policy entrepreneurs in water transitions around the world. Water Policy 13:717–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innocenti D, Albrito P (2011) Reducing the risks posed by natural hazards and climate change: the need for a participatory dialogue between the scientific community and policy makers. Environ Sci Pol 14:730–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen M, Phillips LJ (2002) Discourse analysis as theory and method. Thousand Oaks/Sage, London/New Delhi

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann M, Van Doorn-Hoekveld WJ, Gilissen HK, Van Rijswick HFMW (2016) Analysing and evaluating flood risk governance in the Netherlands. Drowning in safety? STAR-FLOOD consortium, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon J (1984) Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Little/Brown, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Klijn F, Samuels P, Van Os A (2008) Towards flood risk management in the EU: state of affairs with examples from various European countries. Int J River Basin Manag 6:307–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolen B, Helsloot I (2014) Decision-making and evacuation planning for flood risk management in the Netherlands. Disasters 38:610–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koskenniemi M, Leino P (2002) Fragmentation of international law? Postmodern anxieties. Leiden J Int Law 15:553–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kundzewicz ZW, Krysanova V, Dankers R, Hirabayashi Y, Kanae S, Hattermann FF, Huang S, Milly PCD, Stoffel M, Driessen PPJ, Matczak P, Quevauviller P, Schellnhuber HJ (2017) Differences in flood hazard projections in Europe–their causes and consequences for decision making. Hydrol Sci J 62:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Larrue C, Hegger DLT Trémorin JB (2013) Researching flood risk policies in Europe: a framework and methodology for assessing flood risk governance (report no D2.2.1). STAR-FLOOD consortium, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Larrue C, Bruzzone S, Lévy L, Gralepois M, Schellenberger T, Trémorin JB, Fournier M, Manson C, Thuilier T (2016) Analysing and evaluating flood risk governance in France: from state policy to local strategies. STAR-FLOOD consortium, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao K (2012) A theory on urban resilience to floods—a basis for alternative planning practices. Ecol Soc 17:48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March JG, Olsen JP (2008) The logic of appropriateness. In: Moren M, Rein M, Goodin RE (eds) The Oxford handbook of public policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 689–708

    Google Scholar 

  • Matczak P, Lewandowski J, Choryński A, Szwed M, Kundzewicz ZW (2016) Flood risk governance in Poland: looking for strategic planning in a country in transition. STAR-FLOOD Consortium, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Mees HLP, Driessen PPJ, Runhaar HAC (2014) Legitimate and adaptive flood risk governance beyond the dikes: the cases of Hamburg, Helsinki and Rotterdam. Reg Environ Chang 14:671–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mees H, Crabbé A, Alexander M, Kaufmann M, Bruzzone S, Lévy L, Lewandowski J (2016a) Coproducing flood risk management through citizen involvement: insights from cross-country comparison in Europe. Ecol Soc 21:7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mees H, Suykens C, Beyers JC, Crabbé A, Delvaux B, Deketelaere K (2016b) Analysing and evaluating flood risk governance in Belgium. Dealing with flood risks in an urbanised and institutionally complex country. STAR-FLOOD consortium, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijerink S, Dicke W (2008) Shifts in the public-private divide in flood management. Int J Water Resour Dev 24:499–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mens M, Klijn F, De Bruijn KM, Van Beek E (2011) The meaning of system robustness for flood risk management. Environ Sci Policy 14:1121–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2014) OECD principles on water governance. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2007) Institutional rational choice, an assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In: Sabatier PA (ed) Theories of the policy process, Westview press, boulder, pp 21–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C, Sendzimir J, Jeffrey J, Aerts J, Bergkamp G, Cross K (2007) Managing change toward adaptive water management through social learning. Ecol Soc 12:30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priest SJ, Suykens C, Van Rijswick HFMW, Schellenberger T, Goytia S, Kundzewicz ZW, Van Doorn-Hoekveld WJ, Beyers JC, Homewood S (2016) The European union approach to flood risk management and improving societal resilience: lessons from the implementation of the floods directive in six European countries. Ecol Soc 21:50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quevauviller P (2011) Adapting to climate change: reducing water-related risks in Europe – EU policy and research considerations. Environ Sci Policy 14:722–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rijke J, Van Herk S, Zevenbergen C (2013) Towards integrated river basin management: governance lessons from room for the river. In: Klijn F, Schweckendiek T (eds) Comprehensive flood risk management. Taylor and Francis Group, London, pp 1033–1043

    Google Scholar 

  • Runhaar HAC, Gilissen HK, Uittenbroek CJ, Mees HLP, Van Rijswick HFMW (2014) Publieke en/of private verantwoordelijkheden voor klimaatadaptatie – Een juridisch-bestuurlijke analyse en eerste beoordeling, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development/Utrecht Centre for Water, Oceans and Sustainability Law, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier PA, Jenkins–Smith HC (1993) Policy change and learning: an advocacy coalition approach. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier P, Weible CM (2007) The advocacy coalition framework: innovations and clarifications. In: Sabatier PA (ed) Theories of the policy process. Westview Press, Davis

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt VA (2008) Discursive institutionalism: the explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annu Rev Polit Sci 11:303–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt VA (2011) Speaking of change: why discourse is key to dynamics of policy transformation. Critical. Policy Stud 5:106–126

    Google Scholar 

  • True JL, Jones BD, Baumgartner FR (2007) Punctuated-equilibrium theory: explaining stability and change in public policymaking. In: Sabatier PA (ed) Theories of the policy process. Westview Press, Davis CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Brink M, Termeer CAJM, Meijerink S (2011) Are Dutch water safety institutions prepared for climate change? J Water Clim Chang 2:272–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Rijswick HFMW, Havekes H (2012) European and Dutch water law. Europa Law Publishing, Groningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Tatenhove JPM, Leroy P (2000) The institutionalisation of environmental politics. In: Political modernisation and the environment. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Voß J-P, Newig J, Kastens B, Monstadt J, Nölting B (2007) Steering for sustainable development: A typology of problems and strategies with respect to ambivalence, uncertainty and distributed power. J Environ Policy Plan 9(3-4):193–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardekker JAA, De Jong JM, Knoop J, Van der Sluijs JP (2010) Operationalising a resilience approach to adapting an urban delta to uncertain climate changes. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 77:987–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wesselink A, Warner J, Syed A, Chan F, Duc Tran D, Huq H, Huthoff F, Le Thuy F, Le Thuy N, Pinter N, Van Staveren M, Wester P, Zegwaard A (2015) Trends in flood risk management in deltas around the world: are we going ‘soft’? Int J Water Gov 3(4):25–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiering M, Arts B (2006) Discursive shifts in Dutch river management: “deep” institutional change or adaptation strategy? Developments in. Hydrobiology 187:327–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiering M, Kaufmann M, Mees H, Schellenberger T, Ganzevoort W, Hegger DLT, Larrue C, Matczak P (2017) Varieties of flood risk governance in Europe: how do countries respond to driving forces and what explains institutional change? Glob Environ Chang 44:15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winsemius HC, Aerts JCJH, Van Beek LPH, Bierkens MFP, Bouwman A, Jongman B, Kwadijk JCJ, Ligtvoet W, Lucas PL, Van Vuuren DP, Ward PJ (2015) Global drivers of future river flood risk. Nat Clim Chang. https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE2893

  • Zahariadis N (2007) The multiple streams framework; structure, limitations, prospects. In: Sabatier PA (ed) Theories of the policy process. Westview Press, Davis CA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Environmental Governance, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Dries L. T. Hegger, Peter P. J. Driessen & Marloes H. N. Bakker

Authors
  1. Dries L. T. Hegger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter P. J. Driessen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marloes H. N. Bakker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dries L. T. Hegger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Sweco, De Bilt, The Netherlands

    Tom Raadgever

  2. Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Environmental Governance, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Dries Hegger

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hegger, D.L.T., Driessen, P.P.J., Bakker, M.H.N. (2018). Researching Flood Risk Governance in Europe. In: Raadgever, T., Hegger, D. (eds) Flood Risk Management Strategies and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67699-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation