An Interactive Elementary Tutoring System for Oral Health Education Using an Augmented Approach

  • Mitali Sinha
  • Suman Deb
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10514)


The conventional elementary education system in India is mostly guided by formal content development, focusing on areas like math, language, science and social-science. Children tend to retain very little knowledge about other important areas of learning like heath care, which needs to be developed in their foundation years. The education on oral health is one such example which is not given the focus they ought to be. Considering its importance in early education, we propose a learning environment where children would gain knowledge through constant interaction with an intelligent tutoring system. The system addresses the challenges in developing a learning environment for children by introducing audio-visual effects, 3D animations and customizing the tutoring process to provide user-controlled pace of learning. It also employs the Wii Remote for imparting a tangible hardware interaction with the interface. This paper describes the proposed system and the studies conducted on treatment and control groups to evaluate its efficacy and compare the learning outcome at various domains. Experimental results depict positive effects on learning in the proposed technology-enhanced environment and paves a way for the deployment of more interactive, technology-driven learning process in the elementary education system.


Intelligent tutoring system Wii remote Tangible interaction 


  1. 1.
    Montessori, M.: The Montessori Method: Scientific Pedagogy as Applied to Child Education in “the Children’s Houses”. Translated by Anne E. George. Heinemann (1937)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Papert, S.: Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books Inc, New York (1980)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Resnick, M., Ocko, S., Papert, S.: LEGO, logo, and design. Children’s Environments Quarterly, pp. 14–18 (1988)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reiser, B.J., Anderson, J.R., Farrell, R.G.: Dynamic student modelling in an intelligent tutor for LISP programming. IJCAI 85, 8–14 (1985)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ritter, S., Anderson, J.R., Koedinger, K.R., Corbett, A.: Cognitive tutor: applied research in mathematics education. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 14(2), 249–255 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Papadimitriou, A., Grigoriadou, M., Gyftodimos, G.: Interactive problem solving support in the adaptive educational hypermedia system MATHEMA. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 2(2), 93–106 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    VanLehn, K., Lnch, C., Schulze, K., Shapiro, J.A., Shelby, R., Taylor, L., Treacy, D., Weintein, A., Wintersgill, M.: The andes physics tutoring system: five years of evaluations. NAAL ACADEMY ANNAPOLIS MD (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fossati, D., Di Eugenio, B., Brown, C.W., Ohlsson, S., Cosejo, D.G., Chen, L.: Supporting computer science curriculum: Exploring and learning linked lists with iList. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 2(2), 107–120 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gertner, A.S., Van Lehn, K.: Andes: a coached problem solving environment for physics. In: Gauthier, G., Frasson, C., VanLehn, K. (eds.) ITS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1839, pp. 133–142. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). doi: 10.1007/3-540-45108-0_17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Van Scoter, J., Ellis, D., Railsback, J.: Technology in early childhood education: Finding the balance. Northwest Regional Education Laboratory, Portland (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Anderson, D.R., Pempek, T.A.: Television and very young children. Am. Behav. Sci. 48(5), 505–522 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barab, S., Thomas, M., Dodge, T., Carteaux, R., Tuzun, H.: Making learning fun: quest Atlantis, a game without guns. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 53(1), 86–107 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yien, J.-M., Hung, C.-M., Hwang, G.J., Lin, Y.-C.: A gamebased learning approach to improving students’ learning achievements in a nutrition course. TOJET: Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol. 10(2) (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ho, J.H., Zhou, S.Z., Wei, D., Low, A.: Investigating the effects of educational game with wii remote on outcomes of learning. In: Pan, Z., Cheok, A.D., Müller, W., Chang, M. (eds.) Transactions on Edutainment III. LNCS, vol. 5940, pp. 240–252. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-11245-4_21 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gerling, K., Klauser, M., Masuch, M.: Serious interface design for dental health: wiimote-based tangible interaction for school children. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol 634 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chang, Y.C., Lo, J.L., Huang, C.J., Hsu, N.Y., Chu, H.H., Wang, H.Y., Chi, P.Y., Hsieh, Y.L.: Playful toothbrush: ubicomp technology for teaching tooth brushing to kindergarten children. In: proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp. 363–372. ACM(2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Piaget, J.: Piaget’s theory of cognitive development. childhood cognitive development: the essential readings, pp. 33–47 (2000)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mayer, R.E.: Multimedia learning. Psychol. Learn. Motiv. 41, pp. 85–139 (2002)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ryokai, K., Cassell, J.: StoryMat: a play space for collaborative storytelling. In: CHI 1999 Extended Abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. ACM. pp. 272–273 (1999)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bloom, B.S., Krathwohl, D.R., Masia, B.B.: Bloom taxonomy of educational objectives. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA. Copyright© by Pearson Education (1984). <
  21. 21.
    Roehrig, A.D., Christesen, E.: Development and use of a tool for evaluating teacher effectiveness in grades K-12. In: Shute, V., Becker, B. (eds.) Innovative Assessment for the 21st Century. Springer, Boston (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sawada, D., Piburn, M.D., Judson, E., Turley, J., Falconer, K., Benford, R., Bloom, I.: Measuring reform practices in science and mathematics classrooms: The reformed teaching observation protocol. School Sci. Math. 102(6), 245–253 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringNational Institute of TechnologyAgartalaIndia

Personalised recommendations