Advertisement

Proteus spp.

  • Douglas I. Johnson
Chapter

Abstract

  • Genomics:
    • Proteus mirabilis chromosome: 4,099,900 bp; 3685 predicted ORFs (Pearson et al. 2008)

    • Plasmid pHI4320: 36,289 bp; 55 predicted ORFs

  • Cell morphology:
    • Rod-shaped cells (Fig. 24.1)

    • Changes morphology to polyploid elongated swarmer cells on solid surfaces:
      • “Bull’s-eye pattern” due to differentiation changes (Fig. 24.2)

  • Gram stain:
    • Gram negative

  • Growth:
    • Facultative anaerobes; catalase positive

    • Few peritrichous flagella in liquid; hyper-flagellation in swarmer cells on solid surfaces

    • Normal microbiota of human intestinal tract; also found in soil, water, hospitals, and long-term care facilities

    • Three pathogenic species:
      • Proteus mirabilis: ~80 % of infections

      • Proteus vulgaris

      • Proteus penneri

References

  1. Alamuri P, Mobley HL (2008) A novel autotransporter of uropathogenic Proteus mirabilis is both a cytotoxin and an agglutinin. Mol Microbiol 68:997–1017CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Belas R (1994) Expression of multiple flagellin-encoding genes of Proteus mirabilis. J Bacteriol 176:7169–7181CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Bichler K-H, Eipper E, Naber K, Braun V, Zimmermann R, Lahme S (2002) Urinary infection stones. Int J Antimicrob Agents 19:488–498CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bijlsma IGW, Lv D, Kusters JG, Gaastra W (1995) Nucleotide sequences of two fimbrial major subunit genes, pmpA and ucaA, from canine- uropathogenic Proteus mirabilis strains. Microbiology 141:1349–1341. 1357CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bode NJ, Debnath I, Kuan L, Schulfer A, Ty M, Pearson MM (2015) Transcriptional analysis of the MrpJ network: modulation of diverse virulence-associated genes and direct regulation of mrp fimbrial and flhDC flagellar operons in Proteus mirabilis. Infect Immun 83:2542–2556CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Clemmer KM, Rather PN (2007) Regulation of flhDC expression in Proteus mirabilis. Res Microbiol 158:295–302CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Clemmer KM, Rather PN (2008) The Lon protease regulates swarming motility and virulence gene expression in Proteus mirabilis. J Med Microbiol 57:931–937CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Coker C, Poore CA, Li X, Mobley HLT (2000) Pathogenesis of Proteus mirabilis urinary tract infection. Microbes Infect 2:1497–1505CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Himpsl SD, Pearson MM, Arewang CJ, Nusca TD, Sherman DH, Mobley HL (2010) Proteobactin and a yersiniabactin-related siderophore mediate iron acquisition in Proteus mirabilis. Mol Microbiol 78:138–157PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Howery KE, Clemmer KM, Rather PN (2016) The Rcs regulon in Proteus mirabilis: implications for motility, biofilm formation, and virulence. Curr Genet 62:775–789CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Island MD, Mobley HLT (1995) Proteus mirabilis urease: operon fusion and linker insertion analysis of ure gene organization, regulation, and function. J Bacteriol 177:5653–5660CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Mobley HLT, Island MD, Hausinger RP (1995) Molecular biology of microbial ureases. Microbiol Rev 59:451–480PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Norsworthy AN, Pearson MM (2017) From catheter to kidney stone: the uropathogenic lifestyle of Proteus mirabilis. Trends Microbiol 25:304–315CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Pearson MM, Mobley HLT (2008) Repression of motility during fimbrial expression: identification of 14 mrpJ gene paralogues in Proteus mirabilis. Mol Microbiol 69:548–558CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Pearson MM, Sebaihia M, Churcher C, Quail MA, Seshasayee AS, Luscombe NM, Abdellah Z, Arrosmith C, Atkin B, Chillingworth T, Hauser H, Jagels K, Moule S, Mungall K, Norbertczak H, Rabbinowitsch E, Walker D, Whithead S, Thomson NR, Rather PN, Parkhill J, Mobley HL (2008) Complete genome sequence of uropathogenic Proteus mirabilis, a master of both adherence and motility. J Bacteriol 190:4027–4037CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Pellegrino R, Scavone P, Umpierrez A, Maskell DJ, Zunino P (2013) Proteus mirabilis uroepithelial cell adhesin (UCA) fimbria plays a role in the colonization of the urinary tract. Pathog Dis 67:104–107CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Rocha SP, Pelayo JS, Elias WP (2007) Fimbriae of uropathogenic Proteus mirabilis. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 51:1–7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Schaffer JN, Pearson MM (2015) Proteus mirabilis and urinary tract infections. Microbiol Spectr 3(5):1–39. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.UTI-0017-2013
  19. Senior BW, Loomes LM, Kerr MA (1991) The production and activity in vivo of Proteus mirabilis IgA protease in infections of the urinary tract. J Med Microbiol 35:203–207CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Stickler DJ (2014) Clinical complications of urinary catheters caused by crystalline biofilms: something needs to be done. J Int Med 276:120–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Swihart KG, Welch RA (1990) Cytotoxic activity of the Proteus hemolysin HpmA. Infect Immun 58:1861–1869PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Wassif C, Cheek D, Belas R (1995) Molecular analysis of a metalloprotease from Proteus mirabilis. J Bacteriol 177:5790–5798CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglas I. Johnson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Microbiology & Molecular GeneticsUniversity of VermontBurlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations