Microlocal Energy Estimates and Well-Posedness

  • Tatsuo Nishitani
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mathematics book series (LNM, volume 2202)

Abstract

Naturally the structure of the principal symbol p(x, ξ) changes if (x, ξ) varies in the phase space and so does “microlocal” energy estimates. Having proved microlocal energy estimates , the usual next procedure would be to obtain “local” energy estimates by partition of unity. Then one must get rid of the errors caused by the partition of unity. Sometimes it happens that the microlocal energy estimates is too weak to control such errors. In this chapter we propose a new energy estimates for second order operators, much weaker than strictly hyperbolic ones, energy estimates with a gain of H κ norm for a small κ > 0. We show that if for every | ξ′ | = 1 one can find P ξ which coincides with P in a small conic neighborhood of (0, 0, ξ′) for which the proposed energy estimates holds then the Cauchy problem for P is locally solvable in C , which is crucial for our approach to the well-posedness of the Cauchy problem.

References

  1. 20.
    J.J. Duistermaat, Fourier Integral Operators. Progress in Mathematics, vol. 130 (Birkhäuser, Basel, 1994)Google Scholar
  2. 21.
    Yu.V. Egorov, Canonical transformations and pseudodifferential operators. Trans. Moscow Math. Soc. 24, 3–28 (1971)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 29.
    A. Grigis, J. Sjöstrand, Microlocal Analysis for Differential Operators. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 196 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994)Google Scholar
  4. 33.
    L. Hörmander, The Analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators. I. Grundlehren Math. Wiss., vol. 274 (Springer, Berlin, 1983)Google Scholar
  5. 34.
    L. Hörmander, The Analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators. III. Grundlehren Math. Wiss., vol. 274 (Springer, Berlin, 1985)Google Scholar
  6. 40.
    V.Ja. Ivrii, The wellposed Cauchy problem for non-strictly hyperbolic operators, III. The energy integral. Trans. Moscow Math. Soc. (English transl.) 34, 149–168 (1978)Google Scholar
  7. 41.
    V.Ja. Ivrii, Wave fronts of solutions of some hyperbolic pseudodifferential equations. Trans. Moscow Math. Soc. (English transl.) 39, 87–119 (1981)Google Scholar
  8. 57.
    N. Lerner, Metrics on the Phase Space and Non-selfadjoint Pseudo-Differential Operators (Birkhäuser, Basel, 2010)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 59.
    A. Martinez, An Introduction to Semiclassical and Microlocal Analysis. Universitext (Springer, New York, 2002)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 71.
    T. Nishitani, On the finite propagation speed of wave front sets for effectively hyperbolic operators. Sci. Rep. College Gen. Ed. Osaka Univ. 32(1), 1–7 (1983)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 76.
    T. Nishitani, Note on wave front set of solutions to non effectively hyperbolic operators. J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 27, 657–662 (1987)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 85.
    T. Nishitani, Local and microlocal Cauchy problem for non-effectively hyperbolic operators. J. Hyperbolic Differ. Equ. 11, 185–213 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tatsuo Nishitani
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsOsaka UniversityToyonakaJapan

Personalised recommendations