Abstract
This chapter argues that a neo-Aristotelian account of substance faces challenges from the natural sciences. I consider Lowe’s account of substances as being categorized as either material bodies or living organisms. To assess these two categories of substances, I consider developments from physics (esp., quantum field theory), and biology (esp., the evolutionary extended synthesis).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Armstrong, D.M. Universals and Scientific Realism. Vol. I. II vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.
Auyung, Sunny Y. How is Quantum Field Theory Possible?. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Bacon, Francis. Novum Organum. 1620.
Bickhard, Mark. “The Interactivist Model.” Synthese 166, no. 3 (2009): 547–591.
Bunge, M. “Virtual Processes and Virtual Particles: Real or Fictitious?” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, no. 3 (1970): 507–508.
Campbell, Keith. Abstract Particulars. Malden: Blackwell, 1991.
Daeschler, E.B., N.H. Shubin, and F.A. Jenkins. “A Devonian Tetrapod-Like Fish and the Evolution of the Tetrapod Body Plan.” Nature, April 2006: 757–763.
David, Hume. An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding (1772), ed. Tom L. Beauchamp (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1999)
Dirac, P.A.M. “The Quantum Theory of Dispersion.” Proceeding of the Royal Society of London 114, no. 769 (May 1927): 710–728.
Dunningham, Jacob, and Vlatko Vedral. “Nonlocality of a Single Particle.” Physical Review Letters 99 (2007).
Dupré, John. Processes of Life: Essays in the Philosophy of Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Ellis, George. Physicist George Ellis Knocks Physicists for Knocking Philosophy and Free Will. July 22, 2014. blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/2014/07/22/physicist-george-ellis-knocks-physicists-for-knocking-philosophy-free-will (accessed February 22, 2015).
Falkenburg, Brigitte. Particle Metaphysics: A Critical Account of Subatomic Reality. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2007.
Fine, Kit. “What is metaphysics?” In Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics, edited by Tuomas E. Tahko, 8–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Fox, Tobias. “Haunted by the Spectre of Virtual Particles: A Philosophical Reconsideration.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 39, no. 1 (September 2008): 35–51.
French, Steven. The Structure of the World: From Representation to Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Guenin, Louis M. “Developmental Potential.” In Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics, 156–173. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Hilgevoord, Jan, and Jos Uffink. “The Uncertainty Principle.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Edward N. Zalta. 2014. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/qt-uncertainty/ (accessed February 22, 2015).
Hudson, Art. “Electrons as Field Quanta: A Better Way to Teach Quantum Physics in Introductory Physics Courses.” American Journal of Physics 73, no. 7 (2005): 630–634.
Hull, David. “The Effect of Essentialism on Taxonomy–Two Thousand Years of Stasis.” British Journal of Philosophy of Science XVI, no. 61 (May 1965): 1–18.
Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature. Edited by L.A. Selby-Bigge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978.
Keller, Evelyn Fox. The Mirage of a Space Between Nature and Nurture. Durham: Duke University Press, 2010.
Kitcher, Philip. “Explanatory Unification and the Causal Structure of the World.” In Scientific Explanation, edited by Philip Kitcher and Wesley C. Salmon, 410–505. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989.
Koslicki, K. “Essence, Necessity and Explanation”, in: Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics, edited by Tuomas Tahko, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2012, pp. 187–206.
Kuhlmann, Meinard, Holger Lyre, and Andrew Wayne. Ontological Aspecs of Quantum Field Theory. Singapore: World Scientific, 2002.
Ladyman, James, and Don Ross. Every Thing Must Go. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Lewis, David. Counterfactuals. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 1973.
Lowe, E.J. The Possibility of Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Lowe, E.J. The Four-Category Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
Lowe, E.J. “A Neo-Aristotelian Substance Ontology: Neither Relational nor Contingent.” In Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics, edited by Tuomas E. Tahko, 229–248. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Monton, Bradley, and Chad Mohler. “Constructive Empiricism.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Edward N. Zalta. 2014. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/constructive-empiricism/ (accessed February 22, 2015).
Morell, Virginia. “Aspens Return to Yellowstone, With Help From Some Wolves.” Science 317, no. 5837 (2007): 438–439.
Oyama, Susan. Evolution’s Eye: A Systems View of the Biology-Culture Divide. Durham: Duke University Press, 2000.
Pigliucci, Massimo, and Gerd B. Müller. Evolution–The Extended Synthesis. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2010a.
Pigliucci, Massimo, and Gerd B. Müller. “Elements of an Extended Evolutionary Synthesis.” In Evolution–The Extended Synthesis, edited by Massimo Pigliucci and Gerd B. Müller, 3–18. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2010b.
Quine, W.V. “Main Trends in Recent Philosophy.” The Philosophical Review 60, no. 1 (January 1951): 20–43.
Rosenkrantz, Gary. “Ontological Categories.” In Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics, edited by Tuomas E. Tahko, 83–93. Cambridge: Cambridge Uniersity Press, 2012.
Russell, Bertrand. “The Philosophy of Logical Atomism.” The Monist Vol. 29 (1919): 345–380.
Salmon, Wesley C. Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.
Seibt, Johanna. “The Myth of Substance and the Fallacy of Misplaced Concreteness.” Acta Analytica, no. 15 (1996): 61–76.
Shapiro, Stewart. Thinking about Mathematics: The Philosophy of Mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Tahko, Tuomas E., ed. Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Teller, Paul. An Interpretive Introduction to Quantum Field Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.
van Fraassen, Bas C. Scientific Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Wallace, David. The Emergent Multiverse: Quantum Theory According to the Everett Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Winters, Andrew M. “The Evolutionary Relevance of Abstraction and Representation.” Biosemiotics 7, no. 1 (2014): 125–139.
Winters, Andrew M. “Moving Beyond Unification and Modeling: A Reconsideration of Radically Naturalized Metaphysics.” Lato Sensu Vol. 3, no. 1 (2016): 52–60.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Winters, A.M. (2017). Naturalistic Problems with Substance. In: Natural Processes. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67570-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67570-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67569-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67570-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)