Skip to main content

Naturalistic Problems with Substance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Natural Processes
  • 194 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter argues that a neo-Aristotelian account of substance faces challenges from the natural sciences. I consider Lowe’s account of substances as being categorized as either material bodies or living organisms. To assess these two categories of substances, I consider developments from physics (esp., quantum field theory), and biology (esp., the evolutionary extended synthesis).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Armstrong, D.M. Universals and Scientific Realism. Vol. I. II vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auyung, Sunny Y. How is Quantum Field Theory Possible?. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, Francis. Novum Organum. 1620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickhard, Mark. “The Interactivist Model.” Synthese 166, no. 3 (2009): 547–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M. “Virtual Processes and Virtual Particles: Real or Fictitious?” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, no. 3 (1970): 507–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Keith. Abstract Particulars. Malden: Blackwell, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daeschler, E.B., N.H. Shubin, and F.A. Jenkins. “A Devonian Tetrapod-Like Fish and the Evolution of the Tetrapod Body Plan.” Nature, April 2006: 757–763.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, Hume. An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding (1772), ed. Tom L. Beauchamp (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirac, P.A.M. “The Quantum Theory of Dispersion.” Proceeding of the Royal Society of London 114, no. 769 (May 1927): 710–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunningham, Jacob, and Vlatko Vedral. “Nonlocality of a Single Particle.” Physical Review Letters 99 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupré, John. Processes of Life: Essays in the Philosophy of Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, George. Physicist George Ellis Knocks Physicists for Knocking Philosophy and Free Will. July 22, 2014. blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/2014/07/22/physicist-george-ellis-knocks-physicists-for-knocking-philosophy-free-will (accessed February 22, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkenburg, Brigitte. Particle Metaphysics: A Critical Account of Subatomic Reality. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, Kit. “What is metaphysics?” In Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics, edited by Tuomas E. Tahko, 8–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Tobias. “Haunted by the Spectre of Virtual Particles: A Philosophical Reconsideration.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 39, no. 1 (September 2008): 35–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, Steven. The Structure of the World: From Representation to Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guenin, Louis M. “Developmental Potential.” In Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics, 156–173. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilgevoord, Jan, and Jos Uffink. “The Uncertainty Principle.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Edward N. Zalta. 2014. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/qt-uncertainty/ (accessed February 22, 2015).

  • Hudson, Art. “Electrons as Field Quanta: A Better Way to Teach Quantum Physics in Introductory Physics Courses.” American Journal of Physics 73, no. 7 (2005): 630–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, David. “The Effect of Essentialism on Taxonomy–Two Thousand Years of Stasis.” British Journal of Philosophy of Science XVI, no. 61 (May 1965): 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature. Edited by L.A. Selby-Bigge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Evelyn Fox. The Mirage of a Space Between Nature and Nurture. Durham: Duke University Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, Philip. “Explanatory Unification and the Causal Structure of the World.” In Scientific Explanation, edited by Philip Kitcher and Wesley C. Salmon, 410–505. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koslicki, K. “Essence, Necessity and Explanation”, in: Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics, edited by Tuomas Tahko, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2012, pp. 187–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann, Meinard, Holger Lyre, and Andrew Wayne. Ontological Aspecs of Quantum Field Theory. Singapore: World Scientific, 2002.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ladyman, James, and Don Ross. Every Thing Must Go. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David. Counterfactuals. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, E.J. The Possibility of Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, E.J. The Four-Category Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, E.J. “A Neo-Aristotelian Substance Ontology: Neither Relational nor Contingent.” In Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics, edited by Tuomas E. Tahko, 229–248. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monton, Bradley, and Chad Mohler. “Constructive Empiricism.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Edward N. Zalta. 2014. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/constructive-empiricism/ (accessed February 22, 2015).

  • Morell, Virginia. “Aspens Return to Yellowstone, With Help From Some Wolves.” Science 317, no. 5837 (2007): 438–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyama, Susan. Evolution’s Eye: A Systems View of the Biology-Culture Divide. Durham: Duke University Press, 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci, Massimo, and Gerd B. Müller. Evolution–The Extended Synthesis. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2010a.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci, Massimo, and Gerd B. Müller. “Elements of an Extended Evolutionary Synthesis.” In Evolution–The Extended Synthesis, edited by Massimo Pigliucci and Gerd B. Müller, 3–18. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2010b.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V. “Main Trends in Recent Philosophy.” The Philosophical Review 60, no. 1 (January 1951): 20–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenkrantz, Gary. “Ontological Categories.” In Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics, edited by Tuomas E. Tahko, 83–93. Cambridge: Cambridge Uniersity Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand. “The Philosophy of Logical Atomism.” The Monist Vol. 29 (1919): 345–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, Wesley C. Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seibt, Johanna. “The Myth of Substance and the Fallacy of Misplaced Concreteness.” Acta Analytica, no. 15 (1996): 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Stewart. Thinking about Mathematics: The Philosophy of Mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tahko, Tuomas E., ed. Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teller, Paul. An Interpretive Introduction to Quantum Field Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, Bas C. Scientific Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, David. The Emergent Multiverse: Quantum Theory According to the Everett Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Winters, Andrew M. “The Evolutionary Relevance of Abstraction and Representation.” Biosemiotics 7, no. 1 (2014): 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winters, Andrew M. “Moving Beyond Unification and Modeling: A Reconsideration of Radically Naturalized Metaphysics.” Lato Sensu Vol. 3, no. 1 (2016): 52–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew M. Winters .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Winters, A.M. (2017). Naturalistic Problems with Substance. In: Natural Processes. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67570-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics