Advertisement

3D Randomized Connection Network with Graph-Based Inference

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10553)

Abstract

In this paper, a novel 3D deep learning network is proposed for brain MR image segmentation with randomized connection, which can decrease the dependency between layers and increase the network capacity. The convolutional LSTM and 3D convolution are employed as network units to capture the long-term and short-term 3D properties respectively. To assemble these two kinds of spatial-temporal information and refine the deep learning outcomes, we further introduce an efficient graph-based node selection and label inference method. Experiments have been carried out on the publicly available database and results demonstrate that the proposed method can obtain the best performance as compared with other state-of-the-art methods.

References

  1. 1.
    Bertasius, G., Shi, J., Torresani, L.: Semantic segmentation with boundary neural fields. In: IEEE CVPR, pp. 3602–3610 (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen, L.C., Papandreou, G., Kokkinos, I., et al.: Semantic image segmentation with deep convolutional nets and fully connected CRFs (2014). arxiv:1412.7062
  3. 3.
    Çiçek, Ö., Abdulkadir, A., Lienkamp, S.S., Brox, T., Ronneberger, O.: 3D U-net: learning dense volumetric segmentation from sparse annotation. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp. 424–432. Springer, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Grady, L.: Random walks for image segmentation. IEEE TPAMI 28(11), 1768–1783 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hochreiter, S., Schmidhuber, J.: Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9(8), 1735–1780 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ji, S., Xu, W., Yang, M., Yu, K.: 3D convolutional neural networks for human action recognition. IEEE TPAMI 35(1), 221–231 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koltun, V.: Efficient inference in fully connected CRFs with Gaussian edge potentials. NIPS 2(3), 4 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Long, J., Shelhamer, E., Darrell, T.: Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In: IEEE CVPR, pp. 3431–3440 (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Patraucean, V., Handa, A., Cipolla, R.: Spatio-temporal video autoencoder with differentiable memory (2015). arxiv:1511.06309
  10. 10.
    Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., Brox, T.: U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp. 234–241. Springer, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shattuck, D.W., Mirza, M., Adisetiyo, V., Hojatkashani, C., Salamon, G., Narr, K.L., Poldrack, R.A., Bilder, R.M., Toga, A.W.: Construction of a 3D probabilistic atlas of human cortical structures. NeuroImage 39(3), 1064–1080 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tran, D., Bourdev, L., Fergus, R., et al.: Learning spatiotemporal features with 3D convolutional networks. In: IEEE ICCV, pp. 4489–4497 (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Veit, A., Wilber, M.J., Belongie, S.: Residual networks behave like ensembles of relatively shallow networks. In: NIPS, pp. 550–558 (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xingjian, S., Chen, Z., Wang, H., et al.: Convolutional LSTM network: a machine learning approach for precipitation nowcasting. In: NIPS, pp. 802–810 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lo Kwee-Seong Medical Image Analysis Laboratory, Department of Computer Science and EngineeringThe Hong Kong University of Science and TechnologyKowloonHong Kong

Personalised recommendations