Advertisement

Life Cycle Thinking and Analysis, Design for Environment, and Industrial Ecology Frameworks

  • Xiaohong LiEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explores the product life cycle , life cycle analytical tools and design for the environment (DfE) methodology. The product life cycle from an operations management (OM) perspective includes material acquisition, manufacturing, distribution, use and after-use. DfE explores eco-design options at each stage of this product life cycle to proactively reduce the impact of industrial activities on the environment. This chapter also presents two Industrial Ecology (IE) frameworks, one at a factor level and the other one at a supply chain level. These two frameworks illustrate the importance of integration and collaboration among different parts and parties within and across industrial ecosystems to increase levels of closed-loop material, energy and waste flows, which reduce their interaction with natural systems, hence the reduced impact.

Keywords

Life cycle thinking/analysis Design for environment (DfE) Industrial Ecology (IE) frameworks 

References

  1. Airbus ACADEMY. (2017). Airbus Corporate Answers to Disseminate Environmental Management sYstem (ACDEMY), Eco-efficiency and Sustainability, G6, Issues 1 http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/project/Projects/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.showFile&rep=file&fil=ACADEMY_DesignforEnvironment.pdf. Accessed 17 July 2017.
  2. Bernard, S. (2011). Remanufacturing. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 62, 337–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bjørn, A., & Hauschild, M. Z. (2012). Absolute versus relative environmental sustainability: What can the cradle-to-cradle and eco-efficiency concepts learn from each other? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 17(2), 321–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Department for Environment. (2014). Waste legislation and regulations—Detailed guidance—GOV.UK [www document]. https://www.gov.uk/waste-legislation-and-regulations. Accessed 20 July 2017.
  5. Despeisse, M., Ball, P. D., Evans, S., & Levers, A. (2012). Industrial ecology at factory level—A conceptual model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 31, 30–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ehrenfeld, J. (1997). Industrial ecology: A framework for product and process design. Journal of Cleaner Production, 5, 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Graedel, T. E., & Allenby, B. R. (2003). Industrial Ecology (2nd ed.). AT&T and Prentice Hall (1st ed. 1995).Google Scholar
  8. Gmelin, H., & Seuring, S. (2014). Achieving sustainable new product development by integrating product life-cycle management capabilities. International Journal of Production and Economics, 154, 166–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gui, L., Atasu, A., Ergun, O., & Toktay, L. B. (2016). Efficient implementation of collective extended producer responsibility legislation. Management Science, 62(4), 1098–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guinée, J. B., Heijungs, R., Huppes, G., Zamagni, A., Masoni, P., Buonamici, R., et al. (2011). Life cycle assessment: Past, present, and future. Environmental Science and Technology, 45(1), 90–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haynsworth, H. C., & Lyons, R. T. (1987). Remanufacturing by design, the missing link, Production and Inventory Management, second quarter, 24–29.Google Scholar
  12. Hatcher, G. D., Ijomah, W. L., & Windmill, J. F. C. (2011). Design for remanufacture: A literature review and future research needs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19, 2004–2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ISO 14040. (2006). International Standard: Environmental management-life cycle assessment-principles and framework. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organisation for Standardisation.Google Scholar
  14. Jackson, S. A., Gopalakrishna-Remani, V., Mishra, R., & Napier, R. (2016). Examining the impact of design for environment and the mediating effect of quality management innovation on firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 173, 142–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jayaraman, V. (2006). Production planning for closed-loop supply chains with product recovery and reuse: an analytical approach. International Journal of Production Research, 44 (5), 981–998.Google Scholar
  16. Leigh, M., & Li, X. (2015). Industrial ecology, industrial symbiosis and supply chain environmental sustainability: A case study of a large UK distributor. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 632–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lifset, R. (2000). Industrial ecology: Building a framework for eco-design and life cycle assessment. Journal of Japan Institute of Electronics Packaging, 3(5), 403–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lifset, R., Atalay, A., & Naoko, T. (2013). Extended producer responsibility. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 17, 162–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. PwC. (2010). Life cycle assessment and forest products: A white paper. https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/forest-paper-packaging/pdf/fpac-lca-white-paper.pdf. Accessed 18 July 2017.
  20. Silvestre, J. D., de Brito, J., & Pinheiro, M. D. (2014). Environmental impacts and benefits of the end-of-life of building materials e calculation rules, results and contribution to a “cradle to cradle” life cycle. Journal of Cleaner Production, 66, 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Toxopeus, M. E., de Koeijer, B. L. A., & Meij, A. G. G. H. (2015). Cradle to Cradle: Effective vision vs. efficient practice? Procedia CIRP, 29, 384–389.Google Scholar
  22. Xiang, W., & Ming, C. (2011). Implementing extended producer responsibility: Vehicle remanufacturing in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19, 680–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations