Advertisement

Industrial Ecology and Industrial Symbiosis - Definitions and Development Histories

  • Xiaohong LiEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Various definitions of Industrial Ecology (IE) and Industrial Symbiosis (IS) have been provided in the literature over the past thirty years. These definitions have offered some insights but also confusion due to inconsistency. IE, as an interdisciplinary study field, develops and applies different approaches in its four interrelated areas: industrial ecosystem, IS, industrial metabolism (IM) and environmental legislation and regulations. The ultimate goal of IE is to develop nearly closed-loop industrial ecosystems to enhance environmental sustainability. IS focuses on the development of knowledge webs of novel material, energy and waste exchanges to facilitate the establishment of synergies to support the achievement of this IE goal. The difference between IE and IS lies in the focus, instead of the scale of economy.

Keywords

Industrial Ecology Industrial Eymbiosis Definitions Development histories Relationships between Industrial Ecology and Industrial Symbiosis 

References

  1. Ayres, R. U. (1989). Industrial metabolism. In J. H. Ausubel & H. E. Sladovich (Eds.), Technology and Environment (pp. 23–49), Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  2. Boix, M., Montastruc, L., Azzaro-Pantel, C., & Domenech, S. (2015). Optimization methods applied to the design of eco-industrial parks: A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 87, 303–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Branson, R. (2016). Re-structuring Kalundborg: The reality of bilateral symbiosis and other insights. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 4344–4352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chertow, M. (2000). Industrial symbiosis: Literature and taxonomy. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 25, 313–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chertow, M. (2007). “Uncovering” industrial symbiosis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 11, 11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chertow, M., & Ehrenfeld, J. (2012). Organizing self-organising system, towards a theory of Industrial Symbiosis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16, 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Costa, I., & Ferrão, P. (2010). A case study of industrial symbiosis development using a middle-out approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, 984–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Despeisse, M., Ball, P. D., Evans, S., & Levers, A. (2012). Industrial ecology at factory level—A conceptual model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 31, 30–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Domenech, T., & Davies, M. (2011). Structure and morphology of industrial symbiosis network: The case of Kalundborg. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 10, 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dunn, B. C., & Steinemann, A. (1998). Industrial ecology for sustainable communities. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 41, 661–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ehrenfeld, J. (1997). Industrial ecology: A framework for product and process design. Journal of Cleaner Production, 5, 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ehrenfeld, J. (2004). Industrial ecology: A new field or only a metaphor? Journal of Cleaner Production, 12, 825–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ehrenfeld, J., & Gertler, N. (1997). Industrial ecology in practice: The evolution of interdependence at Kalundborg. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 1, 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Erkman, S. (1997). Industrial ecology: An historical view. Journal of Cleaner Production, 5, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frosch, R. A., & Gallopoulos, N. E. (1989). Strategies for manufacturing. Scientific American, 261(September), 144–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gibbs, D., & Deutz, P. (2005). Implementing industrial ecology? Planning for eco-industrial parks in the USA. Geoforum, 36, 452–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Graedel, T. E., & Allenby, B. R. (2003). Industrial Ecology (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: AT&T and Prentice Hall (1st ed. 1995).Google Scholar
  18. Heeres, R. R., Vermulen, W. J. V., & de Walle, F. B. (2004). Eco-industrial park initiatives in the USA and the Netherlands: First lessons. Journal of Cleaner Production, 12, 985–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jacobsen, N. B. (2006). Industrial symbiosis in Kalundborg, Denmark: A quantitative assessment of economic and environmental aspects. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 10, 239–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jelinski, L. W., Graedel, R. A., Laudise, R. A., McCall, D. W., & Patel, C. K. N. (1992). Industrial ecology: Concepts and approaches. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 89, 793–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jensen, P. D., Basson, L., Hellawell, E., Bailey, M. R., & Leach, M. (2011). Quantifying ‘geographic proximity’: Experiences from United Kingdom’s National Industrial Symbiosis Programme. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55, 703–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Korhonen, J. (2001). Four ecosystem principles for an industrial ecosystem. Journal of Cleaner Production, 9, 253–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lehtoranta, S., Nissinen, A., Mattila, T., & Melanen, M. (2011). Industrial symbiosis and the policy instruments of sustainable consumption and production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19, 1865–1875.Google Scholar
  24. Leigh, M., & Li, X. (2015). Industrial ecology, industrial symbiosis and supply chain environmental sustainability: A case study of a large UK distributor. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 632–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lombardi, D. R., & Laybourn, P. (2012). Redefining industrial symbiosis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16, 28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lowe, E., & Evans, L. (1995). Industrial ecology and industrial ecosystems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 3, 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Malcolm, R., & Clift, R. (2002). Barriers to Industrial Ecology: The Strange Case of “The Tombesi Bypass”. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 6 (1), 4–7.Google Scholar
  28. Mirata, M. (2004). Experiences from early stages of a national industrial symbiosis programme in the UK: Determinants and coordination challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 12, 967–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Park, J. M., Park, J. Y., & Park, H.-S. (2016). A review of the eco-industrial park development program in Korea: Progress and achievement in the first phase, 2005–2010. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Seager, T. P., & Theis, T. L. (2002). A uniform definition and quantitative basis for industrial ecology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10, 225–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tian, J., Liu, W., Lai, B., Li, X., & Chen, L. (2014). Study of the performance of eco-industrial park development in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 486–494.Google Scholar
  32. Tibbs, H. (1992). Industrial ecology, an environmental agenda for industry. Whole Earth Review, winter, 4–19.Google Scholar
  33. Valentine, S. V. (2016). Kalundborg Symbiosis: Fostering progressive innovation in environmental networks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 118, 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Van Berkel, R., Fujita, T., Hashimoto, S., & Fujii, M. (2009). Quantitative assessment of urban and industrial symbiosis in Kawasaki. Japan, Environmental Science, 43, 1271–1281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang, G., Feng, X., & Chu, K. H. (2013). A novel approach for stability analysis of industrial symbiosis systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 39, 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations