The Purpose of American Politics

  • Richard Ned Lebow
Chapter

Abstract

The Purpose of American Politics was Morgenthau’s first attempt to author a book primarily about the United States. He explores opposing American political traditions and their implications for foreign policy. In the process, he comments on past and present domestic and foreign crises and the ways they are refracted by Hamiltonian and Jeffersonian understandings of the national purpose. Morgenthau is drawn to the Hamiltonian approach, which is realist in its assumptions. He is nevertheless sympathetic to Jeffersonian emphasis on freedom, which differentiates America, in his view, from other countries. The book represents Morgenthau’s coming to terms with America: it lauds the purposes for which the country was founded. The overall argument of the book is nevertheless pessimistic. On the home front and abroad, Morgenthau contends that America has lost its sense of purpose.

References

  1. Campbell, Craig, and Fredrik Logevall. 2009. America’s Cold War: The Politics of Insecurity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Falk, Richard A. 1977. Normative Constraints on Statecraft: Some Comments on Morgenthau’s Perspective. In Truth and Tragedy, ed. K. Thompson and R. Meyers, 77–84. New York: Transaction.Google Scholar
  3. Greenstein, Fred. 1994. The Hidden-Hand Presidency: Eisenhower as Leader. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Hamilton, Alexander, James Madison, and John Jay. 2003. The Federalist Papers with Letters of ‘Brutus’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Herz, John. 1950. Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma. World Politics 2 (2): 171–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ikenberry, G. John. 2001. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Lebow, Richard Ned. 1963–1978. Conversations with Hans Morgenthau.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 2003. The Tragic Vision of Politics: Ethics, Interests, and Orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Morgenthau, Hans J. 1934. La réalité des normes, en particulier des normes du droit international. Fondements d’une théorie des norms. Paris: Félix Alcan.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 1935. Theorie des sanctions internationals. Revue de droit international et de legislation compareé, 3e série, 16: 474–503 and 809–836.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 1946. Scientific Man versus Power Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 1948a. Politics Among Nations. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 1948b. The Political Science of E. H. Carr. World Politics 1 (1): 127–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ———. 1952. ‘Philosophy of International Relations,’ Lecture Notes. Hans J. Morgenthau Papers, Library of Congress, Washington, DC, Box 81.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 1960a. The Purpose of American Politics. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 1960b. Politics Among Nations. 3rd ed. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 1963a. The Decline of Democratic Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 1963b. The Impotence of American Power. Commentary 36 (5): 384–386.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 1964a. Letter to the Washington Post, March 15.Google Scholar
  20. ———. 1964b. Correspondence with Senator Frank Church. 31 December. Hans J. Morgenthau Papers. Library of Congress, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 1965a. To Intervene or Not to Intervene. Foreign Affairs 45 (3): 425–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. ———. 1965b. Vietnam and the United States. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 1965c. We Are Deluding Ourselves in Vietnam. New York Times Magazine, April 18, pp. 61–73.Google Scholar
  24. ———. 1965d. Russia, the US and Vietnam. New Republic, May 1, pp. 12–13.Google Scholar
  25. ———. 1966a. The Purpose of Political Science. In A Design for Political Science: Scope, Objectives and Methods, ed. J.C. Charlesworth, 63–79. Philadelphia: American Academy of Political and Social Science.Google Scholar
  26. ———. 1966b. Truth and Power: The Intellectual and the Johnson Administration. New Republic, November 26, pp. 8–14.Google Scholar
  27. ———. 1966c. Johnson’s Dilemma: The Alternatives Now in Vietnam. New Republic, May 28, pp. 12–16.Google Scholar
  28. ———. 1967. What Ails America? The New Republic, October 22, pp. 17–21.Google Scholar
  29. ———. 1968. Bundy’s Doctrine of War Without End. New Republic, November 2, pp. 18–20.Google Scholar
  30. ———. 1969. A New Foreign Policy for the United States. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  31. ———. 1970. Truth and Power: Essays of a Decade, 1960–1970. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  32. ———. 1972a. The New Escalation in Vietnam. The New Republic, May 20, pp. 9–11.Google Scholar
  33. ———. 1972b. Between Hanoi and Saigon: Kissinger’s Next Test. The New Leader, November 13, pp. 5–6.Google Scholar
  34. ———. 1974. Explaining the Failures of US Foreign Policy. Letter to the New York Times, October 10.Google Scholar
  35. Raskin, Marcus. 1977. The Idealism of a Realist. In Truth and Tragedy, ed. K. Thompson and R. Meyers, 85–94. New York: Transaction.Google Scholar
  36. Tjalve, Vibeke Schou. 2008. Realist Strategies of Republican Peace: Niebuhr, Morgenthau, and the Politics of Patriotic Dissent. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tocqueville, Alexis de. 2000. Democracy in America, 2 Vols, Trans. and ed. Harvey C. Mansfield and Debra Winthrop. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Zimmer, Louis B. 2011. The Vietnam War Debate: Hans J. Morgenthau and the Attempt to Halt the Drift into Disaster. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Ned Lebow
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of War StudiesKing’s College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations