A New Model for a New World: Why It’s Needed and What It Consists of

  • Annika Steiber
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Business book series (BRIEFSBUSINESS)


Today’s business world is one in which “change itself has changed,” becoming more rapid, pervasive, and ongoing. For most firms, this requires a fundamental re-invention of management, as the typical corporate bureaucracy cannot respond well to rapid changes. This chapter outlines the shortcomings of old-style management and reviews the multiple forces of change that prevail today: technological change, demographic and social change, globalization, and energy and environmental factors. These in turn point to a need for “dynamic capabilities” (per David Teece): the ability to sense and seize new opportunities while reshaping the enterprise accordingly. The chapter closes with some characteristics that a new management model should have, including a people-centric innovation culture, flexible and ambidextrous structures, and active engagement with the firm’s larger ecosystem.


Dynamic capabilities New management model Organizational ambidexterity Entrepreneurial management Innovation management Open innovation 


  1. Bahrami H (1992) The emerging flexible organization: perspectives from Silicon Valley. Calif Manag Rev 34(4):33–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Birkinshaw J (2016) Reinventing management [abstracted from his 2012 book of that title]. Oxford Leadership website at Accessed 20 July 2017
  3. Chesbrough H (2003) Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Publishing, BostonGoogle Scholar
  4. Florida R (2002) The rise of the creative class. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Ford H, Crowther S (1922) My life and work. Garden City Publishing Company, Garden City NYGoogle Scholar
  6. Friedman TL (2015) Moore’s Law turns 50. The New York Times, 13 May 2015 Accessed 17 July 2017
  7. Gratton L (2011) The shift. HarperCollins UK, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Hamel G (2009) Moon shots for management. Harvard Bus Rev 87(2):91–98Google Scholar
  9. Hamel G (2012) What matters now. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  10. Hamm S, Symonds WC (2006) Mistakes made on the road to innovation, Bloomberg Businessweek, 26 Nov 2006: Accessed 29 June 2015
  11. Harreld JB, O’Reilly CA, Tushman ML (2006) Dynamic capabilities at IBM: driving strategy into action. White paper draft, 10 Aug 2006Google Scholar
  12. IBM Institute for Business Value (2015) Myths, exaggerations and uncomfortable truths: the real story behind Millennials in the workplace. IBM, Somers, NY, January 2015: Accessed 22 July 2017
  13. Kleiner A (2013) The dynamic capabilities of David Teece. strategy + business, 11 Nov 2013.
  14. Leonard-Barton D (1992) Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strateg Manag J 13(Special Summer Issue): 111–125Google Scholar
  15. Mintzberg H (1980) Structure in 5´s: a synthesis of the research on organization design. Manag Sci 26(3):322–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. O’Reilly C, Tushman M (2013) Organizational ambidexterity: past, present and future. Acad Manag Perspect 27(4):324–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Porter M (1979) How competitive forces shape strategy. Harv Bus Rev, March 1979. Accessed 17 July 2017
  18. Skarzynski P, Gibson R (2008) Innovation to the core: a blueprint for transforming the way your company innovates. Harvard Business Publishing, BostonGoogle Scholar
  19. Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg Manag J 18(7):509–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Utterback J, Abernathy W (1975) A dynamic model of product and process innovation. Omega 3(6):639–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. World Values Survey (2017) Findings and insights. Accessed 17 July 2017

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Annika Steiber
    • 1
  1. 1.A.S. Management Insights ABSaltsjö-booSweden

Personalised recommendations