Advertisement

Greenhouse Gas Budget of Terrestrial Ecosystems in Monsoon Asia: A Process-Based Model Study for the Period 1901–2014

  • Akihiko Ito
  • Motoko Inatomi
Chapter
Part of the Springer Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry book series (SPRINGERREMO)

Abstract

Terrestrial ecosystems, including both natural vegetation and croplands, in Monsoon Asia play important roles in the global greenhouse gas budget, but there remain large uncertainties in our present regional-scale accounting. In this study, we applied a process-based model, Vegetation Integrative SImulator for Trace gases (VISIT), to the Monsoon Asia region to simulate sinks and sources of CO2, CH4, and N2O in terrestrial ecosystems. From 1901 to 2014, temporal change and spatial distribution of these gases were simulated. The region was estimated as a net sink of CO2 (about a quarter of the global total), but emissions of CH4 and N2O largely offset the effect. Because of heterogeneity and variability in terrestrial processes, we recommend an integrated study to elucidate the total budget in this region.

Keywords

GHG emissions Monsoon Asia VISIT model 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was partly supported by the grant-in-aid of Japan Society for Promotion of Science (KAKENHI No. 26281014).

References

  1. Badarinath KVS, Kharol SK, Latha KM, Chand TR, Prasad VK, Jyothsna AN, Samatha K (2007) Multiyear ground-based and satellite observations of aerosol properties over a tropical urban area in India. Atmos Sci Lett 8(1):7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Badarinath KVS, Sharma AR, Kharol SK, Prasad VK (2009) Variations in CO, O3 and black carbon aerosol mass concentrations associated with planetary boundary layer (PBL) over tropical urban environment in India. J Atmos Chem 62(1):73–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Harris I, Jones PD, Osborn TJ, Lister DH (2014) Updated high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations – the CRU TS3.10 Dataset. Int J Climatol 34:623–642.  https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3711 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hayasaka H, Noguchi I, Putra EI, Yulianti N, Vadrevu K (2014) Peat-fire-related air pollution in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Environ Pollut 195:257–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hurtt GC, Chini LP, Frolking S, Betts RA, Feddema J, Fischer G et al (2011) Harmonization of land-use scenarios for the period 1500–2100: 600 years of global gridded annual land-use transitions, wood harvest, and resulting secondary lands. Clim Change 109:117–161.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0153-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Inatomi M, Ito A, Ishijima K, Murayama S (2010) Greenhouse gas budget of a cool temperate deciduous broadleaved forest in Japan estimated using a process-based model. Ecosystems 13:472–483.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-010-9332-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Ito A (2008) The regional carbon budget of East Asia simulated with a terrestrial ecosystem model and validated using AsiaFlux data. Agric For Meteorol 148:738–747.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.12.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ito A (2010) Changing ecophysiological processes and carbon budget in East Asian ecosystems under near-future changes in climate: implications for long-term monitoring from a process-based model. J Plant Res 123:577–588.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-009-0305-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ito A, Inatomi M (2012) Use and uncertainty evaluation of a process-based model for assessing the methane budget of global terrestrial ecosystems. Biogeosciences 9:759–773.  https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-759-2012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ito A, Oikawa T (2002) A simulation model of the carbon cycle in land ecosystems (Sim-CYCLE): a description based on dry-matter production theory and plot-scale validation. Ecol Model 151:147–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ito A, Nishina K, Noda HM (2016) Evaluation of global warming impacts on the carbon budget of terrestrial ecosystems in monsoon Asia: a multi-model analysis. Ecol Res 31:459–474  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-016-1354-y
  13. Kirschke S, Bousquet P, Ciais P, Saunois M, Canadell JG, Dlugokencky EJ et al (2013) Three decades of global methane sources and sinks. Nat Geosci 6:813–823.  https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO1955 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Le TH, Nguyen TNT, Lasko K, Ilavajhala S, Vadrevu KP, Justice C (2014) Vegetation fires and air pollution in Vietnam. Environ Pollut 195:267–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Oikawa T, Ito A (2001) Modeling carbon dynamics of terrestrial ecosystems in Monsoon Asia. In: Matsuno T, Kida H (eds) Present and future of modeling global environmental change: towards integrated modeling. TERRAPUB, Tokyo, pp 207–219Google Scholar
  16. Pan Y, Birdsey RA, Fang J, Houghton R, Kauppi PE, Kurz WA et al (2011) A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333:988–993.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1201609 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Patra PK, Saeki T, Dlugokencky EJ, Ishijima K, Umezawa T, Ito A et al (2016) Regional methane emission estimation based on observed atmospheric concentrations (2002–2012). J Meteorol Soc Jpn 94:91–113.  https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2016-006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Piao S, Ito A, Li SG, Huang Y, Ciais P, Wang XH et al (2012) The carbon budget of terrestrial ecosystems in East Asia over the last two decades. Biogeosciences 9:3571–3586.  https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-3571-2012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Prasad VK, Lata M, Badarinath KVS (2003) Trace gas emissions from biomass burning from northeast region in India—estimates from satellite remote sensing data and GIS. Environmentalist 23(3):229–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Saikawa E, Prinn RG, Dlugokencky E, Ishijima K, Dutton GS, Hall BD et al (2014) Global and regional emissions estimates for N2O. Atmos Chem Phys 14:4617–4641.  https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4617-2014
  21. Schulze ED, Luyssaert S, Ciais P, Freibauer A, Janssens IA, Soussana JF et al (2009) Importance of methane and nitrous oxide for Europe’s terrestrial greenhouse gases. Nat Geosci 2:842–850.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo686 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Thompson RL, Patra PK, Chevallier F, Maksyutov S, Law RM, Ziehn T et al (2015) Top-down assessment of the Asian carbon budget since the mid 1990s. Nature Communications 7:10724.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10724 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tian H, Chen G, Lu C, Xu X, Ren W, Zhang B et al (2015) Global methane and nitrous oxide emissions from terrestrial ecosystems due to multiple environmental changes. Ecosyst Health Sustainability 1:4.  https://doi.org/10.1890/EHS14-0015.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tian H, Lu C, Ciais P, Michalak AM, Canadell JG, Saikawa E et al (2016) The terrestrial biosphere as a net source of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere. Nature 531:225–228.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16946 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vadrevu KP, Ellicott E, Badarinath KVS, Vermote E (2011) MODIS derived fire characteristics and aerosol optical depth variations during the agricultural residue burning season, north India. Environ Pollut 159(6):1560–1569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vadrevu KP, Lasko K, Giglio L, Justice C (2015) Vegetation fires, absorbing aerosols and smoke plume characteristics in diverse biomass burning regions of Asia. Environmental Research Letters 10(10):105003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vay SA, Choi Y, Vadrevu KP, Blake DR, Tyler SC, Wisthaler A, Hecobian A, Kondo Y, Diskin GS, Sachse GW, Woo JH (2011) Patterns of CO2 and radiocarbon across high northern latitudes during International Polar Year 2008. J Geophys Res Atmos 116:D14Google Scholar
  28. Walter BP, Heimann M (2000) A process-based, climate-sensitive model to derive methane emissions from natural wetlands: application to five wetlands sites, sensitivity to model parameters, and climate. Global Biogeochem Cycles 14:745–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute for Environmental Studies, JapanTsukuba-CityJapan
  2. 2.Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, JapanYokosukaJapan
  3. 3.Forestry and Forest Products Research InstituteTsukubaJapan

Personalised recommendations