Skip to main content

Documentary Evidence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Political Asylum Deceptions
  • 617 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, the authors describe the increasing demand for documentation to support a claimant’s narrative. In legal procedures, documents are often considered to be neutral and given more credibility than oral accounts, when in fact, like narratives, they are dependent on the conditions of their production. Documents function very differently in asylum cases than in other areas of law. There is very little standardization, predictability, or reliability in the evaluation of and use of documents in political asylum hearings. Applying Western legal methods to understand these documents (or absence of documents) only exacerbates a situation already complicated by this lack of standardization, the risk applicants take in acquiring or traveling with documents, and the motivation to use fraudulent documents in life-or-death situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In his study of the history of the passport, John Torpey reviews the concomitant production of legitimate and fraudulent documents. Writing about the introduction of passports in eighteenth-century France, Torpey writes, “It is axiomatic that fraud and forgery are more or less automatic responses to the imposition by states of documentary requirements of this time” (2000: 49).

  2. 2.

    In the case of Perales Serna et al. vs. Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) the judge refused to grant an injunction against the state of Texas and there was to be a full evidentiary hearing to decide whether the failure to obtain a birth certificate unconstitutionally curtails rights of US citizenship or whether the state’s interest in protecting against fraud outweighs those interests. The case was settled before going to a full hearing.

  3. 3.

    Goodman cites Abankwah v. INS, 185 F.3d 18, 26 (2d Cir. 1999).

Bibliography

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bohmer, C., Shuman, A. (2018). Documentary Evidence. In: Political Asylum Deceptions. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67404-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics