Advertisement

Effects of Social Priming on Social Presence with Intelligent Virtual Agents

  • Salam Daher
  • Kangsoo Kim
  • Myungho Lee
  • Ryan Schubert
  • Gerd Bruder
  • Jeremy Bailenson
  • Greg Welch
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10498)

Abstract

This paper explores whether witnessing an Intelligent Virtual Agent (IVA) in what appears to be a socially engaging discussion with a Confederate Virtual Agent (CVA) prior to a direct interaction, can prime a person to feel and behave more socially engaged with the IVA in a subsequent interaction. To explore this social priming phenomenon, we conducted an experiment in which participants in a control group had no priming while those in an experimental group were briefly exposed to an engaging social interaction between an IVA and a nearby CVA (i.e. a virtual actor). The participants primed by exposure to the brief CVA-IVA interaction reported being significantly more excited and alert, perceiving the IVA as more responsive, and showed significantly higher measures of Co-Presence, Attentional Allocation, and Message Understanding dimensions of social presence for the IVA, compared to those who were not primed.

Keywords

Virtual agent Virtual Human Social priming Social presence Co-presence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bailenson, J.N., Beall, A.C., Blascovich, J.: Gaze and task performance in shared virtual environments. The Journal of Visualization and Computer Animation 13(5), 313–320 (2002). http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/vis.297 CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bailenson, J.N., Beall, A.C., Loomis, J., Blascovich, J., Turk, M.: Transformed Social Interaction, Augmented Gaze, and Social Influence in Immersive Virtual Environments. Human Communication Research 31(4), 511–537 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bargh, J.A., Chen, M., Burrows, L.: Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71(2), 230–244 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blaikie, N.: Analyzing quantitative data: From description to explanation. Sage (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blascovich, J.: Social influence within immersive virtual environments. In: Schroeder, R. (ed.) The Social Life of Avatars. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 127–145. Springer, London (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blascovich, J., Loomis, J., Beall, A.C., Swinth, K.R., Hoyt, C.L., Bailenson, J.N.: Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychological Inquiry 13(2), 103–124 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bulu, S.T.: Place presence, social presence, co-presence, and satisfaction in virtual worlds. Computers & Education 58(1), 154–161 (2012). http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360131511002028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cahrtrand, T.L., Bargh, J.A.: The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76(6), 893–910 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    De Leo, G., Diggs, L., Radici, E., Mastaglio, T.: Measuring sense of presence and user characteristics to predict effective training in an online simulated virtual environment. Simulation in Healthcare: Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare 9(1), 1–6 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dijksterhuis, A., Bargh, J.A.: The perception-behavior expressway: Automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 33, 1–40 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Garau, M., Slater, M., Pertaub, D.P., Razzaque, S.: The Responses of People to Virtual Humans in an Immersive Virtual Environment. Presence Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 14(1), 104–116 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goffman, E.: Behavior in public places: notes on the social organization of gatherings. The Free Press (a Division of Simon and Schuster, Inc.), New York, NY USA (1963)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harms, C., Biocca, F.: Internal consistency and reliability of the networked minds measure of social presence. In: Annual International Presence Workshop, pp. 246–251 (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Herbst, K.C., Gaertner, L., Insko, C.A.: My head says yes but my heart says no: cognitive and affective attraction as a function of similarity to the ideal self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84(6), 1206–1219 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Huang, L., Morency, L.-P., Gratch, J.: Virtual rapport 2.0. In: Vilhjálmsson, H.H., Kopp, S., Marsella, S., Thórisson, K.R. (eds.) IVA 2011. LNCS, vol. 6895, pp. 68–79. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-23974-8_8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Knapp, T.R.: Treating ordinal scales as interval scales: an attempt to resolve the controversy. Nursing Research 39(2), 121–123 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kuzon Jr., W.M., Urbanchek, M.G., McCabe, S.: The seven deadly sins of statistical analysis. Annals of Plastic Surgery 37(3), 265–272 (1996)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liew, T.W., Su-Mae, T.: The effects of positive and negative mood on cognition and motivation in multimedia learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 19(2), 104 (2016)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Likert, R.: A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch. Psychol 22, 5–55 (1932)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lok, B., Chuah, J.H., Robb, A., Cordar, A., Lampotang, S., Wendling, A., White, C.: Mixed-reality humans for team training. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 3, 72–75 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lombard, M., Ditton, T.: At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 3(2). http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x
  22. 22.
    Nunez, D., Blake, E.: Conceptual priming as a determinant of presence in virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Graphics, Virtual Reality, Visualisation and Interaction in Africa, pp. 101–108. ACM (2003)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pan, X., Gillies, M., Slater, M.: Male bodily responses during an interaction with a virtual woman. In: Prendinger, H., Lester, J., Ishizuka, M. (eds.) IVA 2008. LNCS, vol. 5208, pp. 89–96. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-85483-8_9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pan, X., Gillies, M., Slater, M.: Virtual character personality influences participant attitudes and behavior-an interview with a virtual human character about her social anxiety. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 2, 1 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pan, Y., Steed, A.: A comparison of avatar, video, and robot-mediated interaction on users’ trust in expertise. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 3, 12 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Peck, T.C., Seinfeld, S., Aglioti, S.M., Slater, M.: Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias. Consciousness and Cognition 22(3), 779–787 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Peña, J., Hancock, J.T., Merola, N.A.: The priming effects of avatars in virtual settings. Communication Research 36(6), 838–856 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Qu, C.: Talking with a Virtual Human: Controlling the Human Experience and Behavior in a Virtual Conversation. TU Delft, Delft University of Technology (2014)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Qu, C., Brinkman, W.P., Wiggers, P., Heynderickx, I.: The effect of priming pictures and videos on a question-answer dialog scenario in a virtual environment. Presence 22(2), 91–109 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Raij, A.B., Johnsen, K., Dickerson, R.F., Lok, B.C., Cohen, M.S., Duerson, M., Pauly, R.R., Stevens, A.O., Wagner, P., Lind, D.S.: Comparing interpersonal interactions with a virtual human to those with a real human. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 13(3), 443–457 (2007)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Srull, T.K., Wyer, R.S.: The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37(10), 1660 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sy, T., Côté, S., Saavedra, R.: The contagious leader: Impact of the leader’s mood on the mood of group members, group affective tone, and group processes. Journal of Applied Psychology 90(2), 295–305 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Watson, D., Clark, L.A., Tellegen, A., Watson, D., Clark, L.A., Tellegen, A.: Positive and negative affect schedule. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54(6), 1063–1070 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wilhelm, F.H., Roth, W.T.: Ambulatory assessment of clinical anxiety. In: Ambulatory Assessment: Computer-assisted Psychological and Psychophysiological Methods in Monitoring and Field Studies, pp. 317–345 (1996)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Willard, G., Isaac, K.J., Carney, D.R.: Some evidence for the nonverbal contagion of racial bias. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 128, 96–107 (2015). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597815000291 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Witmer, B.G., Singer, M.J.: Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 7(3), 225–240 (1998). http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/105474698565686 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Salam Daher
    • 1
  • Kangsoo Kim
    • 1
  • Myungho Lee
    • 1
  • Ryan Schubert
    • 2
  • Gerd Bruder
    • 1
  • Jeremy Bailenson
    • 3
  • Greg Welch
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Central FloridaOrlandoUSA
  2. 2.University of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA
  3. 3.Stanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations