A Chromatic Hexagon of Psychic Dispositions

Chapter
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 388)

Abstract

Colors can be understood in a logical way through the theory of opposition. This approach was recently developed by Dany Jaspers, giving a new and fresh approach to the theory of colors, in particular with a hexagon of colors close to Goethe’s intuitions. On the other hand colors can also be used at a metalogical level to understand and characterize the relations of opposition, including the relations of opposition between colors themselves. In this paper we furthermore develop a theory of psychic dispositions, using the hexagon of opposition of colors. We present a hexagon of psychic dispositions based on colors that we compare in particular with Plutchick’s wheel of emotions.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Catherine Chantilly, Dany Jaspers, Frank Lihoreau, Marcos Silva, and Janaina. Glória, Rio de Janeiro, October 16, 2016

Bibliography

  1. Beziau, J.-Y. (1998). D’une caverne à l’autre, DEA thesis, directed by Sarah Kofman, University Paris 1 – Panthéon Sorbonne, Paris.Google Scholar
  2. Beziau, J.-Y. (2012a). The new rising of the square of oppositio. In J.-Y. Beziau, & D. Jacquette (Eds.), pp. 6–24.Google Scholar
  3. Beziau, J.-Y. (2012b). The power of the hexagon. Logica Universalis, 6, 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beziau, J.-Y. (Ed.) (2014). La puissance du symbole. In La pointure du symbole (pp. 9–34). Paris: Petra.Google Scholar
  5. Beziau, J.-Y. (2016a). Le possible et l’impossible: au-delà de la dichotomie. In Actes du 35ème Congrès de l’ASPLF – Association des Sociétés de Philosophie de Langue Française (Rabat, Maroc, 26–30 Août, 2014) (pp. 53–74). Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  6. Beziau, J.-Y. (2016b). The contingency of possibility. Principia, 20(1), 99–115.Google Scholar
  7. Beziau, J.-Y. (2016c). Disentangling contradiction form contrariety via Incompatibility. Logica Universalis, 10(2–3), 157–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beziau, J.-Y. (2016d). Possibility, imagination and conception. Principios, 23, 59–95.Google Scholar
  9. Beziau, J.-Y. (2017). “Being aware of rational animals”, to appear. In G. Dodig-Crnkovic & R. Giovagnoli (Eds.), Representation and reality: Humans, animals and machines. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Beziau, J.-Y. “Sensation, emotion and feeling”, to appear.Google Scholar
  11. Beziau, J.-Y., & Basti, G. (Eds.). (2016). The square of opposition – a cornerstone of thought. Basel: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
  12. Beziau, J.-Y., & Geogiorgiakis, S. (Eds.). (2016). New dimensions of the square of opposition. Munich: Philosophia.Google Scholar
  13. Beziau, J.-Y., & Giovagnoli, R. (Eds.) (2016). Special issue of Logica Universalis on the square of opposition, 10(2–3).Google Scholar
  14. Beziau, J.-Y., & Jacquette, D. (Eds.). (2012). Around and beyond the square of opposition. Basel: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
  15. Beziau, J.-Y., & Payette, G. (Eds.) (2008). Special issue of Logica Universalis on the square of opposition. 2(1).Google Scholar
  16. Beziau, J.-Y., & Payette, G. (Eds.). (2012). The square of opposition – a general framework for cognition. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  17. Beziau, J.-Y., & Read, S. (Eds.) (2014). Special issue of History and Philosophy of Logic on the history of the square of opposition, 35(4).Google Scholar
  18. Blanché, R. (1966). Structures intellectuelles. Essai sur l’organisation systématique des concepts. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  19. Demey, L., & Smessaert, H. (2016). Metalogical decorations of logical diagrams. Logica Universalis, 10(2–3), 233–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heller, E. (1989). Wie Farben wirken. Farbpsychologie, Farbsymbolik, kreative Farbgestaltung. Hamburg: Rowohlt (translated in English as The Psychology of Colors).Google Scholar
  21. Jaspers, D. (2012). Logic and colour. Logica Universalis, 6, 227–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lefèvre, W., Renn, J., & Schoepflin, U. (Eds.). (2003). The power of images in early modern science. Basel: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
  23. Magnani, L. (2016). The violence hexagon. Logica Universalis, 10, 359–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moretti, A. (2009). The geometry of logical opposition. PhD thesis, directed by J.-Y.Beziau. Neuchâtel: University of Neuchâtel.Google Scholar
  25. Nelsen, R. B. Proofs without words: Exercises in visual thinking. Washington: Mathematical Association of America, Volume I, 1997, Volume II, 2000.Google Scholar
  26. Parrochia, D., & Neuville, P. (2013). Towards a general theory of classification. Basel: Birkhäuser.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pequeno, T., & Beziau, J.-Y. (2011). Rules of the game. In J.-Y. Beziau & M. E. Coniglio (Eds.), Logic without frontiers (pp. 131–144). London: College Publication.Google Scholar
  28. Plutchik, R. (1980). Emotion, theory, research and experience. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  29. Plutchik, R. (2011). The nature of emotions. American Scientist, 89, 344–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shin, S.-J., & Moktefi, A. (2013). Visual reasoning with diagrams. Basel: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
  31. Suppes, P., & Beziau, J.-Y. (2004). Semantic computation of truth based on associations already learned. Journal of Applied Logic, 2, 457–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. von Goethe, J. W. (1840). Zur Farbenlehre (p. 1810). Tübingen: Cotta.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Federal University of Rio de JaneiroRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations