Logic and Colour in Cognition, Logic and Philosophy

Chapter
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 388)

Abstract

Colour has been on the minds of philosophers, logicians and linguists for a very long time: its connection with logic; the relation between percepts and concepts; the influence of colour language on colour thought, and the question whether colour is in the world or purely mental. The present contribution starts from the age-old observation that the four logical opposition relations (contradiction, (sub)contrariety, entailment) as embodied in the square of opposition and extensions thereof such as the Blanché hexagon are not particularly choosy about the actual conceptual content of the lexical fields they organize. They generalize over modal operators, propositional operators, predicate calculus operators, tense operators, etc. Why would that be? In the first place, it must mean that the relations are located at a level of generality which has no regard for the concrete conceptual differences between those fields, latching on to some very general substrate. Actually, taking that idea further, I have argued (Jaspers, Logica Universalis 6: 227–248, 2012) that the level of abstraction away from concrete incarnations in the vertices of the hexagon even needs to break out of the conceptual realm into that of colour percepts, where a homologous patterning among primary and secondary colour percepts obtains.

References

  1. Béziau, J.-Y. (2003). New light on the square of oppositions and its nameless corner. Logical Investigations, 10, 218–232.Google Scholar
  2. Blanché, R. (1952). Quantity, modality, and other kindred systems of categories. Mind, 61, 369–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blanché, R. (1953). Sur l’opposition des concepts. Theoria, 19, 89–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blanché, R. (1966). Structures intellectuelles. Essai sur l’organisation systématique des concepts. Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar
  5. Blanché, R. (1969). Structures intellectuelles. essai sur l’organisation systématique des concepts. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  6. Braine, M. D. S., & Rumain, B. (1981). Children’s comprehension of or: Evidence for a sequence of competencies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 31, 46–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Braine, M. D. S., & Rumain, B. (1983). Logical reasoning. In J. H. Flavell & E. M. Markman (Eds.), Carmichael’s handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3. Cognitive development (4th ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  9. Chomsky, N. (1993). Language and thought. Wakefield/Rhode Island: Moyer Bell.Google Scholar
  10. Gualmini, A., Meroni, L., & Crain, S. (1999). The inclusion of disjunction in child grammar: Evidence from modal verbs. Proceedings of NELS, 30, 247–257.Google Scholar
  11. Horn, L. R. (1972). On the semantic properties of logical operators in English, PhD dissertation, UCLA; distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1976.Google Scholar
  12. Horn, L. R. (1989). A natural history of negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Horn, L. R. (1990). Hamburgers and truth: Why Gricean explanation is Gricean. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 16, 454–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Horn, L. R. (2012). Histoire d’*O: Lexical pragmatics and the geometry of opposition. In J.-Y. Béziau & G. Payette (Eds.), The square of opposition: A general framework for cognition (pp. 393–426). Bern: Lang.Google Scholar
  15. Jacoby, P. (1950). A triangle of opposition in Aristotelian logic. The New Scholasticism, 24, 32–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jacoby, P. (1960). Contrariety and the triangle of opposites in valid inferences. The New Scholasticism, 34, 141–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jaspers, D. (2005). Operators in the Lexicon – On the negative logic of natural language. LOT dissertation series 117, Utrecht Institute of Linguistics/LOT Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.Google Scholar
  18. Jaspers, D. (2009). The language of science and the science of language. On natural words and nonnatural terminology. In D. Jaspers & P. H. Vermoortel (Eds.), Bedrijf & taal, opstellen voor Wilfried Janssens/Business & language, essays in honour of Wilfried Janssens (pp. 543–570). Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
  19. Jaspers, D. (2011). Logic of colours in historical perspective, ms.Google Scholar
  20. Jaspers, D. (2012). Logic and colour. Logica Universalis, 6, 227–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Larson, R., & Jaspers, D. (2011, March). Broad and narrow language faculties.Google Scholar
  22. Moretti, Alessio. 2009. The geometry of logical opposition. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Neuchâtel.Google Scholar
  23. Romano, C. (2010). De la couleur. Un cours. Chatou: Les éditeurs de la transparance.Google Scholar
  24. Russell, B. (1969). An inquiry into meaning and truth. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  25. Sesmat, A. (1951). Logique II: Les raisonnements, la logistique. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
  26. Seuren, P. A. M., & Jaspers, D. (2014). Logico-cognitive structure in the lexicon. Language, 90(3), 607–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smessaert, H. (2009). On the 3d visualisation of logical relations. Logica Universalis, 3, 303–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Van Der Auwera, J. (1996). Modality: The three-layered square. Journal of Semantics, 13, 181–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Van Der Auwera, J. (2001). On the typology of negative modals. In J. Hoeksema, H. Rullmann, V. Sanchez-Valencia, & T. Van der Wouden (Eds.), Perspectives on negation and polarity items (pp. 23–48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vendler, Z. (1995). Goethe, Wittgenstein, and the essence of color. The Monist, 78, 391–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Von Wright, G. (1951). An essay in modal logic. North-Holland/Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  32. Wittgenstein, L. (1977). Remarks on colour. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.KU Leuven campus Brussels CRISSPBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations