Skip to main content

Biomarker Enrichment Design Considerations in Oncology Single Arm Studies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 888 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 218))

Abstract

Oncology drug development has been increasingly shaped by molecularly targeted agents (MTAs), which often demonstrate differential effectiveness driven by the biomarker expression levels on tumors. Innovative statistical designs have been proposed to tackle this challenge, e.g., Freidlin et al. [3, 4], Jiang et al. [7]. All of these are essentially adaptive confirmatory Phase 3 designs that combine the testing of treatment effectiveness in the overall population with an alternative pathway for a more restrictive efficacy claim in a sensitive subpopulation. We believe that, in cases that there are strong biological rationales to support that a MTA may provide differential benefit in a general patient population; proof-of-concept (POC) is likely intertwined with predictive enrichment. Therefore, it is imperative that early phase POC studies be designed to specifically address biomarker-related questions to improve the efficiency of development. In this paper, we propose three strategies for detecting efficacy signals in single-arm studies that allow claiming statistical significance either in the overall population or in a biomarker enriched subpopulation. None of the three methods requires pre-specification of biomarker thresholds, but still maintains statistical rigor in the presence of multiplicity. The performance of these proposed methods are evaluated with simulation studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alosh, M., Huque, M.F.: A flexible strategy for testing subgroups and overall population. Stat. Med. 28, 3–23 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Alosh, M., Huque, M.F.: A consistency-adjusted alpha-adaptive strategy for sequential testing. Stat. Med. 29, 1559–1571 (2010)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Freidlin, B., Simon, R.: Adaptive signature design: an adaptive clinical trial design for generating 1519 and prospectively testing a gene expression signature for sensitive patients. Clin. Cancer 1520 Res. 11, 7872–7878 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Freidlin, B, Jiang, W., Simon, R.: The cross-validated adaptive signature design. Clin. Cancer 1522 Res. 16, 691–698 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry: Enrichment Strategies for Clinical Trials to Support Approval of Human Drugs and Biological Products, 25 May 2005

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hall, P., Wilson, S.: Two guidelines for bootstrap hypothesis testing. Biometrics 47(2), 757–762 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Jiang, W., Freidlin, B., Simon, R.: Biomarker-adaptive threshold design: a procedure for evaluating treatment with possible biomarker-defined subset effect. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 99(13), 1036–1043 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lyles, R., Lin, J.: Sensitivity analysis for misclassification in logistic regression via likelihood methods and predictive value weighting. Stat. Med. 29(22), 2297–2309 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Song, Y., Chi, G.Y.: A method for testing a prespecified subgroup in clinical trials. Stat. Med. 26, 3535–3549 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong Tian .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tian, H., Liu, K. (2019). Biomarker Enrichment Design Considerations in Oncology Single Arm Studies. In: Liu, R., Tsong, Y. (eds) Pharmaceutical Statistics. MBSW 2016. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 218. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67386-8_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics