Skip to main content

Applying Agent-Based Simulation to the Improvement of Agile Software Management

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination (SPICE 2017)

Abstract

Among agile methodologies, eXtreme Programming (XP) is one of the best known and better defined. However, one factor that hinders its application is the lack of native XP support for project management. One of the techniques that could help in the improvement of XP projects management is the simulation modeling. In this paper, we examine, through a literature review, the evidences of the application of modeling and simulation techniques to support the management in XP projects. From this review we conclude that there is still work to be done in this area, and more specifically in the teamwork management, having in mind that agile team management is the most influential factor in achieving agile team productivity. As a proof of concept, we present Sim-Xperience: a simulation model to assist the XP team in the management of their projects; this model, unlike those found in the literature, has been developed following the agent-based paradigm, especially suited to simulate social behaviors. Through the model input parameters you can configure the specific features of the project you want to simulate and of the development team. Thus, the model allows you to analyze the effect of different decisions on team management process, observing the evolution of the project development as well as the deviations in comparison with initial estimations. To illustrate the model simulation we have conducted a case study, where we have seen the results of the simulation model under two different allocation tasks strategies, concluding that using a strategy where the team member experience is not the priority criterion is better for the increase of team experience in the long term.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dyba, T., Dingsøyr, T.: Empirical studies of agile software development: a systematic review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 50, 833–859 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dyba, T., Dingsøyr, T.: What Do We Know about Agile S. D.? Soft. IEEE 26, 6–9 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Serrador, P., Pinto, J.K.: Does Agile work? — A quantitative analysis of agile project success. Int. J. Project Manage. 33, 1040–1051 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Awad, M.A.: A comparison between agile and traditional software development methodologies, M.S. Thesis, University of Western Australia (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beck, K.: Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beck, K., Andres, C.: Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yong, Y., Zhou, B.: Evaluating extreme programming effect through system dynamics modeling. In: International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering, CiSE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Melis, M., Turnu, I., Cau, A., Concas, G.: Evaluating the impact of test-first programming and pair programming through software process simulation. Softw. Process Improv. Pract. 11, 345–360 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Valkenhoef, G.V., Tervonen, T., Brock, B., Postmus, D.: Quantitative release planning in extreme programming. Inf. Softw. Technol. 53, 1227–1235 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Melo, C.O., Cruzes, D.S., Kon, F., Conradi, R.: Interpretative case studies on agile team productivity and management. Inf. Softw. Technol. 55, 412–427 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kellner, M.I., Madachy, R.J., Raffo, D.M.: Software Process Simulation Modeling: Why? What? How? J. Syst. Softw. 46(2), 91–105 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Abdel-Hamid, T.: The dynamics of software project staffing: An Integrative System Dynamics Perspective, Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang, H., Kitchenham, B., Pfahl, D.: Reflections on 10 Years of Software Process Simulation Modeling: A Systematic Review. In: Wang, Q., Pfahl, D., Raffo, David M. (eds.) ICSP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5007, pp. 345–356. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-79588-9_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, H., Kitchenham, B., Pfahl, D.: Software Process Simulation Modeling: An Extended Systematic Review. In: Münch, J., Yang, Y., Schäfer, W. (eds.) ICSP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6195, pp. 309–320. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14347-2_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Madachy, R.J.: Software Process Dynamics. Wiley-IEEE Press, Chichester (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Kuppuswami, S., Vivekanandan, K., Rodrigues, P.: A system dynamics simulation model to find the effects of xp on cost of change curve. In: XP2003 Conference Proceedings, pp. 54–62 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kuppuswami, S., Vivekanandan, K., Ramaswamy, P., Rodrigues, P.: The effects of individual XP practices on software development effort. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 28(6), 6–7 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Misic, V.B., Gevaert, H., Rennie, M.: Extreme dynamics: Modeling the extreme programming software development process. In: Proceedings of ProSim04 workshop on Software Process Simulation and Modeling, pp. 237–242 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Turnu, I., Melis, M., Cau, A., Setzu, A., Concas, G., Mannaro, K.: Modeling and simulation of open source development using an agile practice. J. Syst. Archit. 52(11), 610–618 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Navarro, E.O.: SimSE: A Software Engineering Simulation Environment for Software Process Education. University of California, Irvine (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sterman, J.D.: Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. McGraw-Hill, Boston (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Martinez, I.J., Richardson, G.P.: Best practices in system dynamics modeling. In: Proceedings of the 29th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Hines, H., Diker, V.G. (eds.), Atlanta, GA, USA, pp. 1–22, plenary paper (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Law, A.M.: How to build valid and credible simulation models. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 24–33 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ali, N.B., Petersen, K.A.: A consolidated process for software process simulation: state of the art and industry experience. In: Proceedings of the 38th EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, SEAA 2012, pp. 327–336, art. no. 6328171 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Anylogic (AnylogicTM) http://www.anylogic.com. Accessed: June 2017]

  26. Sharp, H., Robinson, H.: Collaboration and coordination in mature eXtreme programming teams. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 66, 505–518 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sargent, R.G.: Verification and validation of simulation models. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 183–198 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sokolowski, J.A., Banks, C.M.: Principles of Modeling and Simulation: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Wiley, Hoboken (2009)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Sargent, R.G.: Verification and validation of simulation models. In: Proceedings of the 2011Winter Simulation Conference 2011, pp. 183–198 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Choi, K., Bae, D.: Dynamic project performance estimation by combining static estimation models with system dynamics. Inf. Softw. Technol. 51, 162–172 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Garousi, V., Khosrovian, K., Pfahl, D.: A customizable pattern-based software process simulation model: design, calibration and application. Softw. Process Improv. Pract. 14(3), 165–180 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kouskouras, K.G., Georgiou, A.C.: A discrete event simulation model in the case of managing a software project. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 181(1), 374–389 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been funded by the Spanish National Research Agency (AEI) with ERDF funds under grants TIN2013-46928-C3-2-R and TIN2016-76956-C3-3-R, and the Andalusian Plan for Research, Development and Innovation (grant TIC-195).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nuria Hurtado .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hurtado, N., Ruiz, M., Capitas, C., Orta, E. (2017). Applying Agent-Based Simulation to the Improvement of Agile Software Management. In: Mas, A., Mesquida, A., O'Connor, R., Rout, T., Dorling, A. (eds) Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination. SPICE 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 770. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67383-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67383-7_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67382-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67383-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics