Advertisement

The Models of Moving Users and IoT Devices Density Investigation for Augmented Reality Applications

  • M. MakolkinaEmail author
  • A. Koucheryavy
  • A. Paramonov
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10531)

Abstract

Applications of augmented reality penetrate into all spheres of human life. With the emergence of glasses of augmented reality, the introduction of this technology in VANET (Vehicular ad hoc network), etc. a number of interesting questions arise. For example, the amount of data that a user can perceive and understand the significance of the received content. The article develops a user perception model, which depends on the type of data, the amount of information and the significance of the data. The user is a queuing system object that receives various data from the surrounding objects. The data is ranked according to the priorities for which the transmission characteristics are determined. With the movement of the user, objects in his environment change. The user perception model defines the requirements for the service delivery model, which will allow the maximization of information that the user can perceive.

Keywords

Augmented reality User behavior Internet of Things Service model 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The publication was financially supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (the Agreement number 02.a03.21.0008), RFBR according to the research project No. 16-37-00209 mol_a “Development of the principles of integration the Real Sense technology and Internet of Things”.

References

  1. 1.
    Kirichek, R., Vladyko, A., Zakharov, M., Koucheryavy, A.: Model networks for internet of things and SDN. In: 18th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT), pp. 76–79 (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Al-Fuqaha, A., Guizani, M., Mohammadi, M., Aledhari, M., Ayyash, M.: Internet of things: a survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 17(4), 2347–2376 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kirichek, R., Koucheryavy, A.: Internet of things laboratory test bed. In: Zeng, Q.-A. (ed.) Wireless Communications, Networking and Applications. LNEE, vol. 348, pp. 485–494. Springer, New Delhi (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-81-322-2580-5_44 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Broschart, D., Zeile, P.: Architecture: augmented reality in architecture and urban planning. In: Peer Reviewed Proceedings of Digital Landscape Architecture 2015 at Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, pp. 111–118 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Billinghurst, M., Clark, A., Lee, G.: A survey of augmented reality. Found. Trends Hum.-Comput. Inter. 8(2–3), 73–272 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Park, H.S., Kim, K.-H.: AR-based vehicular safety information system for forward collision warning. In: Shumaker, R., Lackey, S. (eds.) VAMR 2014. LNCS, vol. 8526, pp. 435–442. Springer, Cham (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-07464-1_40 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koucheryavy, A., Makolkina, M., Paramonov, A.: Applications of augmented reality traffic and quality requirements study and modeling. In: Vishnevskiy, V.M., Samouylov, K.E., Kozyrev, D.V. (eds.) DCCN 2016. CCIS, vol. 678, pp. 241–252. Springer, Cham (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-51917-3_22 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    BusinessWire: Global Augmented Reality & Virtual Reality in Healthcare Industry Worth USD 641 Million by 2018 - Analysis, Technologies & Forecasts 2013–2018 - Key Vendors: HologicInc, Artificial Life Inc, Aruba Networks - Research and MarketsGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Konstantinova, J., Jiang, A., Althoefer, K., Dasgupta, P., Nanayakkara, T.: Implementation of tactile sensing for palpation in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery: a review. IEEE Sens. J. 14(8), 2490–2501 (2014). Bulling, A., Cakmakci, O., Kunze, K., Rehg, J.M.: Eyewear computing-augmented the humsn with head-mounted wearable assistants. Dagstuhl reports, vol. 6(1), SchlossDagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrumfuerinformatik (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hara, H., Kuwabara, H.: Innovation in On-site work using smart devices and augmented reality. Fujitsu Tech. J. 51(2), 12–19 (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    5G and e-Health. White paper, 5GPPP, October 2015Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pyattaev, A., Johnsson, K., Surak, A., Florea, R., Andreev, S., Koucheryavy, Y.: Network-assisted D2D communications: implementing a technology prototype for cellular traffic offloading. In: Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), pp. 3266–3271. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vladyko, A., Muthanna, A., Kirichek, R.: Comprehensive SDN testing based on model network. In: Galinina, O., Balandin, S., Koucheryavy, Y. (eds.) NEW2AN/ruSMART -2016. LNCS, vol. 9870, pp. 539–549. Springer, Cham (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-46301-8_45 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang, M.: Real-time traffic flow prediction using augmented reality. University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor. Paper 5687 (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Abdi, L., Meddeb, A., Abdallah, F.B.: Augmented reality based traffic sign recognition for improved driving safety. In: Kassab, M., Berbineau, M., Vinel, A., Jonsson, M., Garcia, F., Soler, J. (eds.) Nets4Cars/Nets4Trains/Nets4Aircraft 2015. LNCS, vol. 9066, pp. 94–102. Springer, Cham (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-17765-6_9 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Behzadan, A.H., Kamat, V.R.: Visualization of vehicular traffic in augmented reality for improved planning and analysis of road construction projects. In: Proceedings of 2009 NSF Engineering Research and Innovation Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang, G., Ng., T.S.E.: The impact of virtualization on network performance of amazon EC2 data center. In: Proceeding INFOCOM 2010 Proceedings of the 29th Conference on Information Communications, pp. 1163–1171 (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Andreev, S., Galinina, O., Pyattaev, A., Johansson, K., Koucheryavy, Y.: Analyzing assisted offloading of cellular user sessions onto D2D links in unlicensed bands. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 33(1), 67–80 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Abdi, L., Meddeb, A., Abdallah, F.B.: In-vehicle augmented reality traffic information system: a new type of communication between driver and vehicle. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Wireless, Information, and Communication Technologies (AWICT) (2015)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fu, W.T., Gasper, J., Kim, S.W.: Mixed and augmented reality (ISMAR). In: 2013 IEEE International Symposium, pp. 59–66. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mogelmose, A., Trivedi, M.M., Moeslund, T.B.: Vision-based traffic sign detection and analysis for intelligent driver assistance systems: perspectives and survey. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 13(4), 1484–1497 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Razavi, R., Fleury, M., Ghanbari, M.: Low-delay video control in a personal area network for augmented reality. IET Image Proc. 2(3), 150–162 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Iversen, V.: Teletraffic engineering and network planning, Department of Photonics Engineering, Technical University of Denmark. [http://www.fotonik.dtu.dk]
  24. 24.
    Futahi, A.: Wireless sensor networks with temporary cluster head nodes. In: Futahi, A., Paramonov, A., Koucheryavy, A. (eds.) 18th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT), pp. 283–288 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Bonch-Bruevich State University of TelecommunicationsSt. PetersburgRussian Federation
  2. 2.Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)MoscowRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations