An Exploration of Wikipedia Data as a Measure of Regional Knowledge Distribution

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10540)

Abstract

In today’s economies, knowledge is the key ingredient for prosperity. However, it is hard to measure this intangible asset appropriately. Standard economic models mostly rely on common measures such as enrollment rates and international test scores. However, these proxies focus rather on the quality of education of pupils than on the distribution of knowledge among the whole population, which is increasingly defined by alternative sources of education such as online learning platforms. As a consequence, the economically relevant stock of knowledge in a region is only roughly approximated. Furthermore, they are abstract in content, and both capital-, and time-consuming in census. This paper proposes to explore Wikipedia data as an alternative source of capturing the knowledge distribution on a narrow geographical scale. Wikipedia is by far the largest digital encyclopedia worldwide and provides data on usage and editing publicly. We compare Wikipedia usage worldwide and edits in the U.S. to existing measures of the acquisition and stock of knowledge. The results indicate that there is a significant correlation between Wikipedia interactions and knowledge approximations on different geographical scales. Considering these results, it seems promising to further explore Wikipedia data to develop a reliable, inexpensive, and real-time proxy of knowledge distribution around the world.

Keywords

Mining of big social data Wikipedia Knowledge geographies 

JEL Classification

C 55 C 82 I 21 

References

  1. 1.
    Benos, N., Zotou, S.: Education and economic growth: a meta-regression analysis. World Dev. 64, 669–689 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.06.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mayer-Schönberger, V., Cukier, K.: Learning with Big Data: The Future of Education. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wikimedia, Wikipedia (2017). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia
  4. 4.
    Moy, C.L., Locke, J.R., Coppola, B.P., McNeil, A.J.: Improving science education and understanding through editing Wikipedia. J. Chem. Educ. 87(11), 1159–1162 (2010). doi:10.1021/ed100367v CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ebner, M., Kickmeier-Rust, M., Holzinger, A.: Utilizing Wiki-Systems in higher education classes: a chance for universal access? Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 7(4), 199 (2008). doi:10.1007/s10209-008-0115-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cain, J., Fox, B.I.: Web 2.0 and pharmacy education. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 73(7), 120 (2009). doi:10.5688/aj7307120 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Collier, B., Bear, J.: Conflict, criticism, or confidence: an empirical examination of the gender gap in Wikipedia contributions. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 383–392. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gloor, P., De Boer, P., Lo, W., Wagner, S., Nemoto, K., Fuehres, H.: Cultural Anthropology Through the Lens of Wikipedia-A Comparison of Historical Leadership Networks in the English, Chinese, Japanese and German Wikipedia, arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.05256
  9. 9.
    Eom, Y.-H., Aragón, P., Laniado, D., Kaltenbrunner, A., Vigna, S., Shepelyansky, D.L.: Interactions of cultures and top people of Wikipedia from ranking of 24 language editions. PloS one 10(3), e0114825 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Laufer, P., Wagner, C., Flöck, F., Strohmaier, M.: Mining cross-cultural relations from Wikipedia: a study of 31 European food cultures. In: Proceedings of the ACM Web Science Conference, p. 3. ACM (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ronen, S., Gonçalves, B., Hu, K.Z., Vespignani, A., Pinker, S., Hidalgo, C.A.: Links that speak: the global language network and its association with global fame. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 111(52), E5616–E5622 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yasseri, T., Spoerri, A., Graham, M., Kertész, J.: The most controversial topics in Wikipedia: a multilingual and geographical analysis. arXiv:1305.5566 [physics]
  13. 13.
    Borra, E., Weltevrede, E., Ciuccarelli, P., Kaltenbrunner, A., Laniado, D., Magni, G., Mauri, M., Rogers, R., Venturini, T.: Societal controversies in Wikipedia articles. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 193–196. ACM (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Graham, M., Straumann, R.K., Hogan, B.: Digital divisions of labor and informational magnetism: mapping participation in Wikipedia. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 105(6), 158–1178 (2015). doi:10.1080/00045608.2015.1072791 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Graham, M., Hogan, B., Straumann, R.K., Medhat, A.: Uneven geographies of user-generated information: patterns of increasing informational poverty. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 104(4), 746–764 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Graham, M., De Sabbata, S., Zook, M.A.: Towards a study of information geographies: (im) mutable augmentations and a mapping of the geographies of information. Geo: Geogr. Environ. 2(1), 88–105 (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hardy, D., Frew, J., Goodchild, M.F.: Volunteered geographic information production as a spatial process. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 26(7), 1191–1212 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Graham, M., De Sabbata, S.: Information Geographies at the Oxford Internet Institute (2014). http://geography.oii.ox.ac.uk/
  19. 19.
    Liao, H.-T., Hogan, B., Graham, M., Hale, S.A., Ford, H.: Wikipedia’s Networks and Geographies: Representation and Power in Peer-Produced Content (2010). https://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/projects/wikipedias-networks-and-geographies/

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Vienna University of Economics and BusinessViennaAustria
  2. 2.Oxford Internet InstituteUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations