The Importance of Consent in User Comfort with Personalization

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10540)

Abstract

Numerous research projects have documented concerns that users have with data commonly used by recommender systems. In this paper, we extend that work by specifically investigating the link between consent, explicitly given, and privacy concern. In a study with 662 subjects, we found that the majority of users would not consent to data from outside systems being used to personalize their experience, and sizable minorities object to even internal system data being used. Among those who said they could consent, found they are often uncomfortable with the data being used if they are not asked to consent, but become comfortable after they can explicitly give their consent. We discuss implications for recommender systems going forward, specifically with respect to incorporating data into algorithms when users are unlikely to consent to its use.

References

  1. 1.
    Awad, N.F., Krishnan, M.S.: The personalization privacy paradox: an empirical evaluation of information transparency and the willingness to be profiled online for personalization. MIS Q. 30, 13–28 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Golbeck, J.: User privacy concerns with common data used in recommender systems. In: Spiro, E., Ahn, Y.-Y. (eds.) SocInfo 2016. LNCS, vol. 10046, pp. 468–480. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47880-7_29 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Knijnenburg, B.P., Willemsen, M.C., Gantner, Z., Soncu, H., Newell, C.: Explaining the user experience of recommender systems. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 22(4–5), 441–504 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kumaraguru, P., Cranor, L.F.: Privacy indexes: a survey of westinÕs studies. Institute for Software Research International (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ramakrishnan, N., Keller, B.J., Mirza, B.J., Grama, A.Y., Karypis, G.: Privacy risks in recommender systems. IEEE Internet Comput. 5(6), 54 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Riedl, J.: Personalization and privacy. IEEE Internet Comput. 5(6), 29–31 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lam, S.K., Frankowski, D., Riedl, J.: Do you trust your recommendations? an exploration of security and privacy issues in recommender systems. In: Müller, G. (ed.) ETRICS 2006. LNCS, vol. 3995, pp. 14–29. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). doi:10.1007/11766155_2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sullivan, G.M., Artino Jr., A.R.: Analyzing and interpreting data from likert-type scales. J. Grad. Med. Educ. 5(4), 541–542 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Watson, J., Lipford, H.R., Besmer, A.: Mapping user preference to privacy default settings. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. (TOCHI) 22(6), 32 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations