Attention Please!

Exploring Attention Management on Wikipedia in the Context of the Ukrainian Crisis
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10540)

Abstract

This study investigates the behaviour of Ukrainian, Russian and English Wikipedia contributors in terms of their attention management, which Pierre Lévy casts as the initial stage of personal knowledge management. We analyse the salience of the Ukrainian crisis of 2013-14 as a topic of public discussion on the national, regional and international level, as well as the changing intensity of discussions between Ukrainian-speaking, Russian-speaking and English-speaking communities of Wikipedia contributors. We propose a meta-driven methodology to identify and track multi-faceted topics of public discussion rather than individual articles, which is common practice in Wikipedia scholarship. We develop a ‘discussion intensity’ metric to trace the salience of topics related to the Ukrainian crisis among Wikipedia contributors over time and to detect which aspects of this topic fuel discussions and direct attention. This method allows for a comparison across different language versions of Wikipedia and enables the identification of major differences in the attention management of different communities of Wikipedia creators and the role of the encyclopaedia in the development of collective knowledge. We observe three distinct patterns of collective attention management, which we characterize as intense attention, dispersed attention, and focused attention.

Keywords

Wikipedia Ukrainian crisis Collective intelligence Attention management 

References

  1. 1.
    Shirky, C.: Cognitive Surplus: Creativity and Generosity in a Connected Age. Penguin Books, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Levy, P.: The creative conversation of collective intelligence. In: Delwiche, A., Henderson, J. (eds.) The Participation of Culture Handbook, pp. 99–108. Routledge, London (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baytiyeh, H., Pfaffman, J.: Volunteers in Wikipedia: why the community matters. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 13, 128–140 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Halavais, A., Lackaff, D.: An analysis of topical coverage of Wikipedia. J. Comput. Commun. 13, 429–440 (2008). doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00403.x Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stvilia, B., Twidale, M., Gasser, L., Smith, L.: Information quality discussions in Wikipedia. In: Knowledge Management: Nurturing Culture, Innovation, and Technology - Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Knowledge Management, pp. 101–113. Graduate School of Library and Information science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kuznetsov, S.: Motivations of contributors to Wikipedia. SIGCAS Comput. Soc. 36(2) (2006). doi:10.1145/1215942.1215943 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brown, A.R.: Wikipedia as a data source for political scientists: accuracy and completeness of coverage. PS Polit. Sci. Polit. 44, 339–343 (2011). doi:10.1017/S1049096511000199 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Greenstein, S., Zhu, F.: Is Wikipedia biased? Am. Econ. Rev. 102, 343–348 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Adler, B.T., De Alfaro, L., Pye, I.: Detecting Wikipedia vandalism using WikiTrust: lab report for PAN at CLEF 2010. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chang, T., Lin, H., Lin, Y.: Feature transformation method enhanced vandalism detection in Wikipedia (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tang, X., Zhou, G., Fu, Y., Gan, L., Yu, W., Li, S.: Detecting Wikipedia vandalism with a contributing efficiency-based approach (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alfonseca, E., Garrido, G., Delort, J.-Y., Peñas, A.: WHAD: Wikipedia historical attributes data: historical structured data extraction and vandalism detection from the Wikipedia edit history. Lang. Resour. Eval. 47, 1163–1190 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Heindorf, S., Potthast, M., Stein, B., Engels, G.: Vandalism detection in Wikidata. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 327–336 (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sepehri Rad, H., Barbosa, D.: Towards identifying arguments in Wikipedia pages. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, WWW 2011 (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kittur, A., Suh, B., Pendleton, B.A., Chi, E.H.: He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yasseri, T., Sumi, R., Rung, A., Kornai, A., Kertész, J.: Dynamics of conflicts in Wikipedia. PLoS ONE 7, e38869 (2012). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038869 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gandica, Y., Sampaio Dos Aidos, F., Carvalho, J.: The dynamic nature of conflict in Wikipedia. EPL. 108, 1–6 (2014). doi:10.1209/0295-5075/108/18003
  18. 18.
    Sepehri-Rad, H., Barbosa, D.: Identifying controversial Wikipedia articles using editor collaboration networks. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 6, 1–24 (2015). doi:10.1145/2630075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kalyanasundaram, A., Wei, W., Carley, K.M., Herbsleb, J.D.: An agent-based model of edit wars in Wikipedia: how and when is consensus reached. In: Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    DeDeo, S.: Conflict and computation on Wikipedia: a finite-state machine analysis of editor interactions. Futur. Internet. 8, 31 (2016). doi:10.3390/fi8030031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jankowski-Lorek, M., Nielek, R., Wierzbicki, A., Zieliński, K.: Predicting controversy of Wikipedia articles using the article feedback tool. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (2014)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brandes, U., Lerner, J.: Is editing more rewarding than discussion?  A statistical framework to estimate causes of dropout from Wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Motivation and Incentives on the Web, Webcentives 2009, co-located with WWW 2009, Innsbruck (2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sumi, R., Yasseri, T., Rung, A., Kornai, A., Kert́esz, J.: Edit wars in Wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and IEEE International Conference on Social Computing, PASSAT/SocialCom 2011 (2011)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Borra, E., Kaltenbrunner, A., Mauri, M., Weltevrede, E., Laniado, D., Rogers, R., Ciuccarelli, P., Magni, G., Venturini, T.: Societal controversies in Wikipedia articles. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2015)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bykau, S., Korn, F., Srivastava, D., Velegrakis, Y.: Fine-grained controversy detection in Wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Engineering (2015)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Li, H., Ma, J.: A novel method for identifying controversial contents of Wikipedia articles based on revision history. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 11, 5697–5707 (2015). http://or.nsfc.gov.cn/bitstream/00001903-5/354778/1/1000014423263.pdf
  27. 27.
    Rudas, C., Surányi, O., Yasseri, T., Török, J.: Understanding and coping with extremism in an online collaborative environment: a data-driven modeling. PLoS ONE 12, e0173561 (2017). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0173561 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jurgens, D., Lu, T.: Temporal motifs reveal the dynamics of editor interactions in Wikipedia. In: Breslin, J.G., Ellison, N.B., Shanahan, J.G., Tufekci, Z. (eds.) ICWSM. The AAAI Press (2012)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jang, M., Allan, J.: Improving automated controversy detection on the web. In: SIGIR 2016 - Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (2016)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sepehri Rad, H., Makazhanov, A., Rafiei, D., Barbosa, D.: Leveraging editor collaboration patterns in Wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media, pp. 13–22. ACM, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rad, H.S., Barbosa, D.: Identifying controversial articles in Wikipedia: a comparative study. In: WikiSym 2012 Conference Proceedings - 8th Annual International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (2012)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ghimpu, A.-G.: New media and the knowledge management: The Wikipedia project. Philobiblon, XIX, pp. 357–366 (2014)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sun, D., Park, S., Jung, H.: Knowledge management using Wikipedia. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2009)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hepp, M., Siorpaes, K., Bachlechner, D.: Harvesting wiki consensus: using Wikipedia entries as vocabulary for knowledge management. IEEE Internet Comput. 11, 54–65 (2007). doi:10.1109/MIC.2007.110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yang, H.-L., Lai, C.-Y.: Understanding knowledge-sharing behaviour in Wikipedia. Behav. Inf. Technol. 30, 131–142 (2011). doi:10.1080/0144929X.2010.516019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Niederer, S., van Dijck, J.: Wisdom of the crowd or technicity of content? Wikipedia as a sociotechnical system. New Media Soc. 12, 1368–1387 (2010). doi:10.1177/1461444810365297 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wagner, C.: Wiki: a technology for conversational knowledge management and group collaboration. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 13, 265–289 (2004)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bonabeau, E.: Decisions 2.0: the power of collective intelligence. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 50, 45–52 (2009)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kittur, A., Lee, B., Kraut, R.E.: Coordination in collective intelligence: the role of team structure and task interdependence. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1495–1504. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Oren, E., Völkel, M., Breslin, J.G., Decker, S.: Semantic wikis for personal knowledge management. In: Bressan, S., Küng, J., Wagner, R. (eds.) DEXA 2006. LNCS, vol. 4080, pp. 509–518. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). doi:10.1007/11827405_50 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lévy, P.: Collective Intelligence: Mankind’s Emerging World in Cyberspace. Persus Books, Cambridge (1997)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Dounaevsky, H.: Building wiki history: between consensus and edit-warring. In: Rutten, E., Zvereva, V. (eds.) Memory, Conflict and New Media: Web Wars in Post-Socialist States, pp. 130–142. Routledge, London (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations