Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
SpringerLink
Log in

Risk-Based Decision Making in IoT Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems Architecture and Technology: Proceedings of 38th International Conference on Information Systems Architecture and Technology – ISAT 2017 (ISAT 2017)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 655))

  • 1330 Accesses

Abstract

We propose a general framework for systems of the Internet of Things based on ideas of reliability trust, transaction gain, and risk. The major contribution of this work is the integration of the reliability trust estimated at the perception layer and risk estimation based on global control information provided by the cloud layer. We propose establishing a decision-making process on a random variable-based gain-loss model and methods of choice under risk. The proposed approach is general – it can be used for a wide range of trust-based decisions undertaken in the perception layer, such as routing, sensor selection, data aggregation, intrusion detection, and others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    An alternative is policy-based trust, which is based on predefined rules and credentials, and is in fact a "hard" security measure.

  2. 2.

    Trustworthiness is usually defined as the objective probability that the trustee will perform a particular action on which the interests of the trustor depend.

  3. 3.

    We will denote random variables with capital letters. F G (g) is the cumulative distribution function of G.

References

  1. Atzori, L., Iera, A., Morabito, G.: The internet of things: a survey. Comput. Netw. 54(15), 2787–2805 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. IETF RFC Homepage, IP Mobility Support for IPv4, Revised https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5944. Last Accessed 10 May 2017

  3. The 7th Framework Programme funded European Research and Technological Development from 2007 until 2013; Internet of Things and Future Internet Enterprise Systems. http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/enet/projects_en.html. Last Accessed 10 May 2017

  4. Architectural Reference Model for the IoT – (ARM). Introduction booklet. http://iotforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/120613-IoT-A-ARM-Book-Introduction-v7.pdf. Last Accessed 10 May 2017

  5. Da Xu, L., He, W., Li, S.: Internet of things in industries: a survey. IEEE Trans. Industr. Inf. 10(4), 2233–2243 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jalali, R., El-Khatib, K., McGregor, C.: Smart city architecture for community level services through the internet of things. In: 18th International Conference on Intelligence in Next Generation Networks (ICIN), pp. 108–113 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Al-Fuqaha, A., Guizani, M., Mohammadi, M., Aledhari, M., Ayyash, M.: Internet of things: a survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 17(4), 2347–2376 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rasmusson, L., Janssen, S.: Simulated social control for secure internet commerce. In: Proceedings of the 1996 New Security Paradigms Workshop. ACM (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yan, Z., Holtmanns, S.: Trust modeling and management: from social trust to digital trust. IGI Global, 290–323 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Marsh, S.P.: Formalising trust as a computational concept (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gupta, M., Judge, P., Ammar, M.: A reputation system for peer-to-peer networks. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Network and Operating Systems Support for Digital Audio and Video, pp. 144–152 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Han, G., Jiang, J., Shu, L., Niu, J., Chao, H.C.: Management and applications of trust in wireless sensor networks: a survey. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 80(3), 602–617 (2014)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Cho, J.H., Swami, A., Chen, R.: A survey on trust management for mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 13(4), 562–583 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Azzedin, F., Maheswaran, M.: Evolving and managing trust in grid computing systems. In: IEEE CCECE 2002 Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, vol. 3, pp. 1424–1429 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fernandez-Gago, C., Moyano, F., Lopez, J.: Modelling trust dynamics in the Internet of Things. Inf. Sci. 396, 72–82 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yan, Z., Zhang, P., Vasilakos, A.V.: A survey on trust management for internet of things. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 42, 120–134 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lize, G., Jingpei, W., Bin, S.: Trust management mechanism for internet of things. China Commun. 11(2), 148–156 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gambetta, D.: Can we trust trust. In: Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, vol. 13, pp. 213–237 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jøsang, A., Ismail, R., Boyd, C.: A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision. Decis. Support Syst. 43(2), 618–644 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cho, J.H., Swami, A., Chen, R.: A survey on trust management for mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 13(4), 562–583 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hadjichristofi, G.C., Adams, W.J., Davis, N.J.: A framework for key management in mobile ad hoc networks. In: International Conference on Information Technology: Coding and Computing, ITCC 2005, vol. 2, pp. 568–573 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Virendra, M., Jadliwala, M., Chandrasekaran, M., Upadhyaya, S.: Quantifying trust in mobile ad-hoc networks. In: International Conference on Integration of Knowledge Intensive Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 65–70 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Li, R., Li, J., Liu, P., Chen, H.H.: On-demand public-key management for mobile ad hoc networks. Wirel. Commun. Mobile Comput. 6(3), 295–306 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jøsang, A.: A logic for uncertain probabilities. Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl.-Based Syst. 9(03), 279–311 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Nicholson, W., Snyder, C.: Microeconomic Theory: Basic Principles and Extensions. Nelson Education (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jozefczyk, J., Gasior, D.: Utility-based models and decision making problems for selected network processes. Kybernetes 44(6/7), 1107–1121 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.M., Heath, D.: Coherent measures of risk. Math. Finance 9(3), 203–228 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Ogryczak, W., Ruszczyński, A.: From stochastic dominance to mean-risk models: semideviations as risk measures. Europ. J. Oper. Res. 116(1), 33–50 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Locke, D.: MQ telemetry transport (MQTT) v3. 1 protocol specification. IBM developerWorks, Markham, ON, Canada, Tech. Lib https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/ws-mqtt/. Last Accessed 10 May 2017

  30. Hunkeler, U., Truong, H.L., Stanford-Clark, A.: MQTT-S—A publish/subscribe protocol for wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on COMSWARE, pp. 791–798 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Computer Science, Warsaw University of Technology, Nowowiejska 15/19, 00-665, Warsaw, Poland

    Grzegorz J. Blinowski

Authors
  1. Grzegorz J. Blinowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grzegorz J. Blinowski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Computer Science and Management, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław, Poland

    Leszek Borzemski

  2. Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Computer Science and Management, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław, Poland

    Jerzy Świątek

  3. Department of Management Systems, Faculty of Computer Science and Management, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław, Poland

    Zofia Wilimowska

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Blinowski, G.J. (2018). Risk-Based Decision Making in IoT Systems. In: Borzemski, L., Świątek, J., Wilimowska, Z. (eds) Information Systems Architecture and Technology: Proceedings of 38th International Conference on Information Systems Architecture and Technology – ISAT 2017. ISAT 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 655. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67220-5_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67220-5_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67219-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67220-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation