Designing for Digital Inclusion: A Post-Hoc Evaluation of a Civic Technology

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10539)

Abstract

Digital inequalities are a major obstacle in diversifying the public discourse on the Internet. To explore the potential of a system design to help bridging digital inequalities across gender and race, we conducted a post-hoc evaluation of design decisions within a civic technology that were particularly dedicated to increase participation of women and people of color. While many aspects of digital inequality stay unresolved, our results provide evidence in support of such dedicated design decisions. Our work also makes a methodological contribution by providing an approach to use external public data sets to supplement user demographic data, without which studies of digital inclusion could only rely on self-reported, potentially biased data. We discuss the empirical and ethical implications of our research approach and results.

Keywords

Digital inclusion Gender Race Civic technology 

References

  1. 1.
    Abdullah, C., Karpowitz, C.F., Raphael, C.: Equity and inclusion in online community forums: an interview with Steven Clift. J. Public Delib. 12(2), 3 (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akoumianakis, D., Stephanidis, C.: Universal design in HCI: a critical review of current research and practice. In: Adjunct Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 499–500 (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson, M.: Americans Internet Access: 2000–2015. Technical report, Pew Research Center (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Antin, J., Yee, R., Cheshire, C., Nov, O.: Gender differences in Wikipedia editing. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration, WikiSym 2011, pp. 11–14. ACM, New York (2011). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2038558.2038561
  5. 5.
    Collier, B., Bear, J.: Conflict, confidence, or criticism: an empirical examination of the gender gap in Wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW 2012, pp. 383–392 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dahlberg, L.: Extending the public sphere through cyberspace: the case of Minnesota e-democracy. First Monday 6(3) (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dijk, J.A.V.: Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics 34(4), 221–235 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Druin, A.: Cooperative inquiry: developing new technologies for children with children. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 1999, pp. 592–599. ACM, New York (1999). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/302979.303166
  9. 9.
    Elliott, M.N., Morrison, P.A., Fremont, A., McCaffrey, D.F., Pantoja, P., Lurie, N.: Using the census bureaus surname list to improve estimates of race/ethnicity and associated disparities. Health Serv. Outcomes Res. Method. 9(2), 69–83 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Farzan, R., Savage, S., Saviaga, G.: Bring on board new enthusiasts! A case study of impact of Wikipedia art + feminism edit-a-thon events on newcomers. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Informatics, SocInfo 2016 (2016, to appear)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hale, S.A., John, P., Margetts, H.Z., Yasseri, T.: Investigating political participation and social information using big data and a natural experiment. In: APSA 2014 Annual Meeting (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hankerson, D., Marshall, A.R., Booker, J., El Mimouni, H., Walker, I., Rode, J.A.: Does technology have race? In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 473–486. ACM (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hargittai, E., Shaw, A.: Mind the skills gap: the role of internet know-how and gender in differentiated contributions to Wikipedia. Inf. Commun. Soc. 18(4), 424–442 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hill, B.M., Shaw, A.: The Wikipedia gender gap revisited: characterizing survey response bias with propensity score estimation. PloS ONE 8(6), e65782 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hoffmann, C.P., Lutz, C., Meckel, M.: Content creation on the Internet: a social cognitive perspective on the participation divide. Inf. Commun. Soc. 18(6), 696–716 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jen, B., Kaur, J., De Heus, J., Dillahunt, T.R.: Analyzing employment technologies for economically distressed individuals. In: Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2014, pp. 1945–1950. ACM, New York (2014). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2559206.2581290
  17. 17.
    Joiner, R., Stewart, C., Beaney, C.: Gender Digital Divide. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Psychology, Technology and Society, p. 74. Wiley, Chichester (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lam, S.K., Uduwage, A., Dong, Z., Sen, S., Musicant, D., Terveen, L., Riedl, J.: WP:Clubhouse? An exploration of Wikipedia’s gender imbalance. In: WikiSym 2011. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kofink, A.: Contributions of the under-appreciated: gender bias in an open-source ecology. In: Companion Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Systems, Programming, Languages and Applications: Software for Humanity, pp. 83–84. ACM (2015)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kurniawan, S., Mahmud, M., Nugroho, Y.: A study of the use of mobile phones by older persons. In: CHI 2006 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 989–994. ACM (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lalji, Z., Good, J.: Designing new technologies for illiterate populations: a study in mobile phone interface design. Interact. Comput. 20(6), 574–586 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lazar, J., Dudley-Sponaugle, A., Greenidge, K.D.: Improving web accessibility: a study of webmaster perceptions. Comput. Hum. Behav. 20(2), 269–288 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Malik, M.M., Pfeffer, J.: Identifying platform effects in social media data. In: ICWSM, pp. 241–249 (2016)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mislove, A., Lehmann, S., Ahn, Y.Y., Onnela, J.P., Rosenquist, J.N.: Understanding the demographics of Twitter users. In: ICWSM, vol. 11, p. 5 (2011)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Novak, T.P.: Bridging the racial divide on the Internet. Sci. (AAAS-Wkly. Pap. Ed.) 280(5362), 390–391 (1998)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Oreglia, E., Liu, Y., Zhao, W.: Designing for emerging rural users: experiences from China. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2011, pp. 1433–1436. ACM, New York (2011). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1978942.1979152
  27. 27.
    Radovanović, D., Hogan, B., Lalić, D.: Overcoming digital divides in higher education: digital literacy beyond facebook. New Media Soc. 17(10), 1733–1749 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Richard, G.T.: Designing games that foster equity and inclusion: encouraging equitable social experiences across gender and ethnicity in online games. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2013 Workshop: Designing and Evaluating Sociability in Online Video Games, Paris, France, pp. 83–88 (2013)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rumbul, R.: Who benefits from civic technology? Demographic and public attitudes research into the users of civic technologies. Technical report, mySociety (2015)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sambasivan, N., Cutrell, E., Toyama, K., Nardi, B.: Intermediated technology use in developing communities. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2583–2592. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schradie, J.: The trend of class, race, and ethnicity in social media inequality: who still cannot afford to blog? Inf. Commun. Soc. 15(4), 555–571 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Small, J., Schallau, P., Brown, K., Appleyard, R.: Web accessibility for people with cognitive disabilities. In: CHI 2005 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1793–1796. ACM (2005)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Smith, A.: Civic engagement in the digital age. Technical report, Pew Research Center (2013)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Van Dijk, J.A.: Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics 34(4–5), 221–235 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vasilescu, B., Capiluppi, A., Serebrenik, A.: Gender, representation and online participation: a quantitative study of StackOverflow. In: 2012 International Conference on Social Informatics (SocialInformatics), pp. 332–338. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yardi, S., Bruckman, A.: Income, race, and class: exploring socioeconomic differences in family technology use. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3041–3050. ACM (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad Técnica Federico Santa MaríaValparaísoChile
  2. 2.University of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations