Social Networking Sites Withdrawal

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10539)

Abstract

The importance of the users for the survival of a social networking site is vital. For this reason, most of the research about this topic is focused about how to make the user to participate on the network. However, little has been researched about the reasons why a user would decide to close its account and leave the network for good. This research is aimed to study this phenomenon based on the Social Identity Theory, specifically the disidentification concept. The research implemented the means-end chain methodology using the data collected from in-depth interviews to 26 adults who have closed an SNS account. This data was analyzed through content analysis and using Social Network Analysis as an alternative to map the chains suggested by the means end chain methodology, as well as providing more information based on the centrality measures. The findings suggest that impression management, friendship, time management and emotional stability play a central role to take the withdrawal decision.

Keywords

Social networking sites Withdrawal Identity Disidentification Means-end chain Social Network Analysis Social Identity Theory 

References

  1. 1.
    Krasnova, H., et al.: Why participate in an online social network: an empirical analysis. In: 16th European Conference on Information Systems ECIS 2008, National, Galway, Ireland (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Al-Debei, M.M., Al-Lozi, E., Papazafeiropoulou, A.: Why people keep coming back to Facebook: explaining and predicting continuance participation from an extended theory of planned behaviour perspective. Decis. Support Syst. 55(1), 43–54 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Garcia, D., Mavrodiev, P., Schweitzer, F.: Social resilience in online communities: the autopsy of friendster. In: Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Online Social Networks. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hargittai, E.: Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 13(1), 276–297 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Joinson, A.N.: ‘Looking at’, ‘looking up’ or ‘keeping up with’ people? Motives and uses of Facebook, Florence (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shi, N., et al.: The continuance of online social networks: how to keep people using Facebook? Koloa, Kauai, HI (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C., Lampe, C.: The benefits of facebook “friends:” social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 12(4), 1143–1168 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nadkarni, A., Hofmann, S.G.: Why do people use Facebook? Pers. Individ. Differ. (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Robards, B.: Leaving MySpace, joining Facebook: ‘growing up’ on social network sites. Continuum 26(3), 385–398 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Valenzuela, S., Park, N., Kee, K.F.: Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college student’s life satisfaction, trust, and participation. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 14(4), 875–901 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vandenberghe, F.: Reconstructing humants: a humanist critique of actant-network theory. Theor. Cult. Soc. 19(5–6), 51–67 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sillaber, C., Chimiak-Opoka, J., Breu, R.: Understanding and modeling usage decline in social networking services. In: Uden, L., Herrera, F., Bajo Pérez, J., Corchado Rodríguez, J. (eds.) 7th International Conference on Knowledge Management in Organizations: Service and Cloud Computing. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 172. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30867-3_34 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ashforth, B.E., Mael, F.: Social identity theory and the organization. Acad. Manag. Rev. 14(1), 20–39 (1989)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kreiner, G.E., Ashforth, B.E.: Evidence toward an expanded model of organizational identification. J. Organ. Behav. 25(1), 1–27 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Anand, V., Joshi, M., O’Leary-Kelly, A.M.: An organizational identity approach to strategic groups. Organ. Sci. 24(2), 571–590 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sluss, D.M., Ashforth, B.E.: Relational identity and identification: defining ourselves through work relationships. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32(1), 9–32 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tajfel, H., Turner, J.C.: The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: Austin, W.G., Worchel, S. (eds.) Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Nelson-Hall Publishers, Chicago (1986)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Baker, R.K., White, K.M.: Predicting adolescents’ use of social networking sites from an extended theory of planned behaviour perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(6), 1591–1597 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hogg, M.A., Abrams, D.: Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes. Routledge, London (1988)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kreiner, G.E., Ashforth, B.E., Sluss, D.M.: Identity dynamics in occupational dirty work: integrating social identity and system justification perspectives. Organ. Sci. 17(5), 619–636 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Steele, C.M.: A threat in the air: how stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. Am. Psychol. 52(6), 613 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Woodcock, A., et al.: The consequences of chronic stereotype threat: domain disidentification and abandonment. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 103(4), 635 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chen, F.F., Kenrick, D.T.: Repulsion or attraction? Group membership and assumed attitude similarity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 83(1), 111 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Eidelman, S., Biernat, M.: Derogating black sheep: individual or group protection? J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 39(6), 602–609 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Leary, M.R., Kowalski, R.M.: Impression management: a literature review and two-component model. Psychol. Bull. 107(1), 34 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zou, X., Morris, M.W., Benet-Martínez, V.: Identity motives and cultural priming: cultural (dis) identification in assimilative and contrastive responses. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 44(4), 1151–1159 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Verkuyten, M., Yildiz, A.A.: National (dis) identification and ethnic and religious identity: a study among Turkish-Dutch Muslims. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 33(10), 1448–1462 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Josiassen, A.: Consumer disidentification and its effects on domestic product purchases: an empirical investigation in the Netherlands. J. Mark. 75(2), 124–140 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Scharff, C.: Young women’s negotiations of heterosexual conventions: theorizing sexuality in constructions of ‘the feminist’. Sociology 44(5), 827–842 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Elsbach, K.D., Bhattacharya, C.B.: Defining who you are by what you’re not: organizational disidentification and the national rifle association. Organ. Sci. 12(4), 393–413 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bhattacharya, C., Elsbach, K.D.: Us versus them: the roles of organizational identification and disidentification in social marketing initiatives. J. Publ. Policy Mark. 21(1), 26–36 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    McIntosh, A.J., Thyne, M.A.: Understanding tourist behavior using means–end chain theory. Ann. Tour. Res. 32(1), 259–262 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Morandin, G., Bagozzi, R.P., Bergami, M.: Brand community membership and the construction of meaning. Scand. J. Manag. (2013)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    van Rekom, J., Wierenga, B.: On the hierarchical nature of means-end relationships in laddering data. J. Bus. Res. 60(4), 401–410 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Botschen, G., Thelen, E.M., Pieters, R.: Using means-end structures for benefit segmentation: an application to services. Eur. J. Mark. 33(1/2), 38–58 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Reynolds, T.J., Gutman, J.: Laddering theory, method, analysis, and interpretation. J. Advert. Res. 28(1), 11–31 (1988)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Olson, J.C., Reynolds, T.J.: The means-end approach to understanding consumer decision making. In: Reynolds, T.J., Olson, J.C. (eds.) Understanding Consumer Decision Making: The Means-end Approach to Marketing and Advertising Strategy. L. Erlbaum, New Jersey (2001)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gutman, J.: A means-end chain model based on consumer categorization processes. J. Mark. 46(2), 60–72 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Reynolds, T.J., Gutman, J.: Advertising is image management. J. Advert. Res. 27–37 (1984)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Olson, J.C., Reynolds, T.J.: Understanding consumers’ cognitive structures: implications for advertising strategy. Advert. Consum. Psychol. 1, 77–90 (1983)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Subramony, D.P.: Why users choose particular web sites over others: introducing a “means-end” approach to human-computer interaction. J. Electron. Commer. Res. 3(3), 144–161 (2002)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Pai, P., Arnott, D.C.: User adoption of social networking sites: eliciting uses and gratifications through a means–end approach. Comput. Hum. Behav. (2012)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Xiao, L.: Consumer motivations in online group buying: a means-end chain approach. In: PACIS 2013 Proceedings (2013)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Leão, A.L.M., Mello, S.C.: The means-end approach to understanding customer values of a on-line newspaper. BAR-Braz. Adm. Rev. 4(1), 1–20 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Abeele, V.V., Zaman, B.: Laddering the User Experience! (2009)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bech-Larsen, T., Nielsen, N.A.: A comparison of five elicitation techniques for elicitation of attributes of low involvement products. J. Econ. Psychol. 20(3), 315–341 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Reynolds, T.J., Dethloff, C., Westberg, S.J.: Advancements in Laddering. Understanding Consumer Decision Making: The Means-End Approach to Marketing and Advertising Strategy, pp. 91–118 (2001)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Matook, S.: Conceptualizing means-end chains of user goals as networks. Inf. Manag. 50(1), 24–32 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bagozzi, R.P., Sekerka, L.E., Hill, V.: Hierarchical motive structures and their role in moral choices. J. Bus. Ethics 90(4), 461–486 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Gengler, C.E., Klenosky, D.B., Mulvey, M.S.: Improving the graphic representation of means-end results. Int. J. Res. Mark. 12(3), 245–256 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Pieters, R., Baumgartner, H., Allen, D.: A means-end chain approach to consumer goal structures. Int. J. Res. Mark. 12(3), 227–244 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hansen, D.L., Shneiderman, B., Smith, M.A.: Analysing social media networks with NODEXL. In: Insights from a Connected World 2010. Elsevier Inc., Burlington (2010)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Bagozzi, R.P., Dholakia, U.M.: Intentional social action in virtual communities. J. Interact. Mark. 16(2), 2–21 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Vasalou, A., Joinson, A.N., Courvoisier, D.: Cultural differences, experience with social networks and the nature of “true commitment” in Facebook. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 68(10), 719–728 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ren, Y., Kraut, R., Kiesler, S.: Applying common identity and bond theory to design of online communities. Organ. Stud. 28(3), 377–408 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hou, J.: Uses and gratifications of social games: blending social networking and game play. First Monday 16(7) (2011)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Terry, D.J., Hogg, M.A., White, K.M.: The theory of planned behaviour: self-identity, social identity and group norms. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 38(3), 225–244 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Havard, C.T.: Glory out of reflected failure: the examination of how rivalry affects sport fans. Sport Manag. Rev. 17, 243–253 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Valentine, G., Sporton, D.: How other people see you, it’s like nothing that’s inside’: the impact of processes of disidentification and disavowal on young people’s subjectivities. Sociology 43(4), 735–751 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Leppard, P., Russell, C., Cox, D.N.: Improving means-end-chain studies by using a ranking method to construct hierarchical value maps. Food Qual. Prefer. 15(5), 489–497 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Smith, M., et al.: NodeXL: a free and open network overview, discovery and exploration add-in for Excel 2007/2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Buffardi, L.E., Campbell, W.K.: Narcissism and social networking web sites. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 34(10), 1303–1314 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Papacharissi, Z.: The presentation of self in virtual life: characteristics of personal home pages. Journal. Mass Commun. Q. 79(3), 643–660 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Ellison, N., Heino, R., Gibbs, J.: Managing impressions online: self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 11(2), 415–441 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., Lampe, C.: Spatially bounded online social networks and social capital. Int. Commun. Assoc. 36(1–37) (2006)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Nadkarni, A., Hofmann, S.G.: Why do people use Facebook? Pers. Individ. Differ. 52(3), 243–249 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Mehdizadeh, S.: Self-presentation 2.0: narcissism and self-esteem on Facebook. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 13(4), 357–364 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Zhao, S., Grasmuck, S., Martin, J.: Identity construction on Facebook: digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Comput. Hum. Behav. 24(5), 1816–1836 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Cha, J.: Factors affecting the frequency and amount of social networking site use: motivations, perceptions, and privacy concerns. First Monday 15(12) (2010)Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Dimmick, J., Kline, S., Stafford, L.: The gratification niches of personal e-mail and the telephone competition, displacement, and complementarity. Commun. Res. 27(2), 227–248 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Dimmick, J., et al.: Extending society’: the role of personal networks and gratification-utilities in the use of interactive communication media. New Media Soc. 9(5), 795 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Foregger, S.K.: Uses and gratifications of Facebook.com. Michigan State University (2008)Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Kim, Y., Sohn, D., Choi, S.M.: Cultural difference in motivations for using social network sites: a comparative study of American and Korean college students. Comput. Hum. Behav. 27(1), 365–372 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Nyland, R.: The gratification niches of online social networking, e-mail and face-to-face communication. Brigham Young University (2007)Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Papacharissi, Z., Rubin, A.M.: Predictors of internet use. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 44(2), 175–196 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Park, N., Kee, K.F., Valenzuela, S.: Being immersed in social networking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes. CyberPsychol. Behav. 12(6), 729–733 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Ramirez Jr., A., et al.: Revisiting interpersonal media competition the gratification niches of instant messaging, e-mail, and the telephone. Commun. Res. 35(4), 529–547 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Sangwan, S.: Virtual community success: a uses and gratifications perspective. In: HICSS 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2005 (2005)Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Kwon, O., Wen, Y.: An empirical study of the factors affecting social network service use. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(2), 254–263 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Lorenzo-Romero, C., Del Chiappa, G.: Adoption of social networking sites by Italian. Inf. Syst. e-Bus. Manag. 1–23 (2013)Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Baumeister, R.F., Leary, M.R.: The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol. Bull. 117(3), 497 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Griepentrog, B.K., et al.: Integrating social identity and the theory of planned behavior: predicting withdrawal from an organizational recruitment process. Pers. Psychol. 65(4), 723–753 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ManizalesManizalesColombia
  2. 2.Centre for Knowledge, Innovation, Technology and EnterpriseNewcastle University Business SchoolNewcastle upon TyneUK
  3. 3.Goldman Chair of InnovationNewcastle University Business SchoolNewcastle upon TyneUK

Personalised recommendations