Abstract
Across the United States primarily on a town or city basis, the increasing public awareness and understanding of the detrimental impact of human activity on the environment is fostering the development and visibility of grassroots sustainability efforts. This is most readily noted in plastic bag, Styrofoam, and plastic bottle bans. These efforts have been typically facilitated by education campaigns focused on the symbiotic relationship between human life and the planet and the intrinsic or non-market derived value of the ecosystems we inhabit. However, often the communication strategy employed has been limited by an appeal to a like-minded stakeholder constituency, reducing the traction benefit from engaging other stakeholders and the subsequent en masse alignment with regulatory intent. This paper details a grassroots effort and the stakeholder engagement process related to a specific ban. It describes the development and implementation process as carried out through a university-town partnership, where the approach taken includes proactive stakeholder engagement inclusive of a consumer survey instrument. Though survey results reveal interest and even concern for the environment, interestingly the results also highlight a self-evaluation bias among respondents. Results show that respondent perception of environmental concern is inconsistent with their actions, providing an entry point and justification for multi-channel education and communications strategies differentiated by stakeholder grouping.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barclay, E. (2013). How plastic in the ocean is contaminating your seafood. NPR. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2013/12/12/250438904/how-plastic-in-the-ocean-is-contaminating-your-seafood.
Bayly, L. (2016, May 28). Ban the bag? Why plastic bag taxes and bans don’t always work. NBC News. Retrieved from http://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/ban-bag-why-plastic-bag-taxes-bans-don-t-always-n580926.
Berman, J. J., & Zimpfer, D. G. (1980). Growth groups: Do the outcomes really last? Review of Educational Research, 50(4), 505–524.
Cózar, A., EchevarrÃa, F., González-Gordillo, J. I., lrigoien, X., Úbeda, B., Hemández-León, S. et al. (2014). Plastic debris in the open ocean. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the United States of America, 111(28).
Convery, F., McDonnell, S., & Ferreira, S. (2007). The most popular tax in Europe? Lessons from the Irish plastic bags levy. Environ Resource Economics, 1–11.
Cooper, T. L., Bryer, T. A., & Meek, J. W. (2006). Citizen-centered collaborative public management. Public Administration Review, 66, 76–88.
Daniels, D., Krosnick, J., Tichy, M., & Tompson, T. (2012). Public opinion on environmental policy in the united states. Retrieved from https://pprg.stanford.edu/wp- content/uploads/5-Public-opinion-on-environmental-policy-in-the-United-States.pdf.
Grimm, P. (2010). Social desirability bias. In J. Sheth & N. K. Malhotra (Eds.) Wiley international encyclopedia of marketing. New York: Wiley.
Harvey, C. (2016, December 30). Yes, this is real: Michigan just banned banning plastic bags. Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2016/12/30/yes-this-is-real-michigan-just-banned-banning-plastic-bags/?utm_term=.97a099876762.
Hutton, I. (2004). Plastic perils for seabirds. Nature Australia, 28(2), 52–59.
Larsen, J., & Venkova, S. (2014). Plastic bag bans spreading in the United States. In Earth- Policy.org. Retrieved from http://www.earth-policy.org/plan_b_updates/2014/update122.
Laskow, S. (2014). How the plastic bag became so popular. The Atlantic. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/10/how-the-plastic-bag-became-so-popular/381065/.
Nhamo, G. (2008). Regulating plastics waste: Stakeholder engagement and sustainability challenges in South Africa. Urban Forum, 19(1), 83–101.
Ostman, R., & Parker, J. (1987). Impact of Education, Age, Newspapers, and Television on Environmental Knowledge, Concerns, and Behaviors. 1–9.
Thompson, H. (2014). Recycling: You may be doing it wrong. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/recycling-you-may-be-doing-it-wrong-180951192/?no-ist.
Westminster College. (2013). Westminster College plastic bag facts. Westminster College. Retrieved from http://www.westminstercollege.edu/pdf/environmental_center/Plastic%20Bag%20Facts%20.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Stakeholder Survey
-
1.
What is the age range you fall under?
-
1.
Under 21
-
2.
21–30
-
3.
31–40
-
4.
41–50
-
5.
51–60
-
6.
61–70
-
7.
Over 70
-
1.
-
2.
What is your educational attainment level?
-
1.
High school
-
2.
Some college
-
3.
College degree
-
4.
Some graduate school
-
5.
Graduate degree/Professional degree
-
1.
-
3.
What street do you live on in Bridgewater (only the street name)
__________________________________________________________
-
4
Do you support the Plastic Bag Reduction Ordinance?
-
1.
Yes
-
2.
No
-
3.
Not familiar—if this is the answer provide a copy and the lay explanation.
-
1.
-
5.
Would you be willing to pay more for consumer goods if it meant protecting the environment?
-
1.
Yes
-
2.
No
-
3.
Not sure
If yes, what percent?
__________________________________________________________
-
1.
-
6.
Do you consider yourself to be environmentally conscious?
-
1.
Yes
-
2.
No
-
3.
Not sure
-
1.
-
7.
How often would you say you take reusable bags with you when you go shopping?
-
1.
Always
-
2.
Most of the time
-
3.
Sometimes
-
4.
Never
-
1.
-
8.
Please respond to this statement: I have a personal responsibility to help make a difference on environmental issues like waste, resource consumption, and water use.
-
1.
Strongly Disagree
-
2.
Disagree
-
3.
Slightly Disagree
-
4.
Slightly Agree
-
5.
Agree
-
6.
Strongly Agree
-
1.
-
9.
Do you believe that reducing the use of plastic bags is beneficial to the environment?
-
1.
Yes
-
2.
No
-
3.
Uncertain
If yes, why? Please choose the most significant from these categories:
Pollution in creation and disposal of plastic bags
Litter and aesthetics
Animal protection
Use of non-renewable resources and dependency on the same
Other ___________________________________________________
-
1.
-
10.
Have you noticed plastic bags in trees and other areas?
-
1.
Yes
-
2.
No
If yes, do you view the Plastic Bag Reduction Ordinance as an opportunity to reduce this type of litter?
-
1.
Yes
-
2.
No
-
1.
-
11.
Do you believe that the Plastic Bag Reduction Ordinance will be inconvenient for customers?
-
1.
Yes
-
2.
No
-
3.
Maybe
If yes or maybe why? Please choose from the following:
Have to pay for a bag
Have to carry a bag
Other _____________________________________________________
-
1.
-
12.
Would you like to learn more about the harmful ecosystem and health impacts of plastic?
-
1.
Yes
-
2.
No
-
3.
Maybe
If yes,
Would you attend a public forum?
Prefer direct mail—in your tax statements, for example.
Other
-
1.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Venkatesan, M., Remy, J., Sukeforth, A. (2018). Sustainability and Civic Engagement: A Communications Engagement and Education Plan. In: Leal Filho, W., Marans, R., Callewaert, J. (eds) Handbook of Sustainability and Social Science Research. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67122-2_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67122-2_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67121-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67122-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)