Skip to main content

Historical Routes and Current Practice for Personal Identification

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
P5 Medicine and Justice

Abstract

This article is about identification of cadavers and human remains, focusing mainly on the more accepted methods to establish identity. Emphasis is provided on the methods applied to bodies in an advanced state of decomposition and/or skeletonized and the contribution of each sub-discipline in the field of identification, including anthropology, odontology, genetics, imagiology and dactiloscopy. Some insights on the history of personal identification and emerging issues and future perspectives are discussed, such as the need of implementation of best practices to identification and the comparative phase of identification. To do this, is of paramount importance that all the countries adopt a same policy to collect ante and post mortem data, which has been claimed by all international agencies dealing with this subject.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cattaneo C, Tidball Binz M, Penados L, Prieto J, Finegan O, Grandi M (2015) The forgotten tragedy of unidentified dead in the Mediterranean. Forensic Sci Int 250:e1–2

    Google Scholar 

  2. http://www.interpol.int/es/INTERPOL-expertise/Forensics/DVI-Pages/DVI-guide. Accessed 17 Nov 2016

  3. https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ncic/ncic-missing-person-and-unidentified-person-statistics-for-2013. Accessed 17 Nov 2016

  4. International Committee of the Red Cross. https://www.icrc.org. Accessed 17 Nov 2016

  5. Cattaneo C, Porta D, De Angelis D, Gibelli D, Poppa P, Grandi M (2010) Unidentified bodies and human remains: an Italian glimpse through a European problem. Forensic Sci Int 195(1–3):167.e1–6

    Google Scholar 

  6. Thompson T, Black S (eds) (2007) Forensic human identification. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  7. Black S (2007) Identity. In: Thompson T, Black S (eds) Forensic Human identification: An Introduction. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  8. Galloway V, Charlton D (2007) Fingerprints. In: Thompson T, Black S (eds) Forensic Human identification. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 57–72

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jeffreys AJ, Allen MJ, Hagelberg E, Sonnberg A (1992) Identification of the skeletal remains of Josef Mengele by DNA analysis. Forensic Sci Int 56(1):65–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kimmerle E, Falsetti A, Ross A (2010) Immigrants, undocumented workers, runaways, transients and the homeless: towards contextual identification among unidentified decedents. Forensic Sci Policy Manage Int J 1(4):178–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hagelberg E, Gray IC, Jeffreys AJ (1991) Identification of the skeletal remains of a murder victim by DNA analysis. Nature 352(6334):427–429

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cunha E, Lima M (2016) Complicities between forensic anthropology and forensic genetics: new opportunities for genomics? In: Lima M, Ramos A, Santos C (eds) Genomics in biological anthropology: new challenges, new opportunities. Bentham Science Publishers, pp 206–218(13)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Quatrehomme G (2015) Traité d’anthropologie medico-légale. De Boeck, Louvain

    Google Scholar 

  14. Navega D, Coelho C, Vicente R, Ferreira MT, Wasterlain S, Cunha E (2015) Ancestrees: ancestry estimation with randomized decision trees. Int J Legal Med 129(5):1145–1153. doi:10.1007/s00414-0141050-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kahana T, Hiss J (1997) Identification of human remains: forensic radiology. J Clin Forensic Med 4(1):7–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mann RW (1998) Use of bone trabeculae to establish positive identification. Forensic Sci Int 30;98(1–2):91–99

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cunha E (2006) Pathology as a factor of personal identity in Forensic Anthropology. In: Schmitt A, Cunha E, Pinheiro J (eds) Forensic anthropology and medicine. Complementary sciences from recovery to cause of death. Humana Press, Tottowa, pp 333–358

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cunha E, Pinheiro J (2013) Bone Pathology and Antemortem Trauma. In: Siegel JA, Saukko PJ (eds) Encyclopedia of forensic sciences, vol 1, 2nd edn. Academic Press, Waltham, pp 76–82

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Ubelaker D, Jacobs D (1995) Identification of orthopedic device manufacturer. J Forensic Sci 40(2):168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Clarkson J, Schaefer M (2007) Surgical intervention. In: Thompson T, Black S (eds) Forensic human identification. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 127–146

    Google Scholar 

  21. Besana JL, Rogers TL (2010) Personal identification using the frontal sinus. J Forensic Sci 55(3):584–589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Thali MJ, Yen K, Schweitzer W et al (2003) Virtopsy, a new imaging horizon in forensic pathology: virtual autopsy by postmortem multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)—a feasibility study. J Forensic Sci 48(2):386–403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dedouit F, Telmon N, Costagliola R, Otal P, Florence LL, Joffre F, Rougé D (2007) New identification possibilities with postmortem multislice computed tomography. Int J Legal Med 121(6):507–510

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dedouit F, Savall F, Mokrane FZ, Rousseau H, Crubézy E, Rougé D, Telmon N (2014) Virtual anthropology and forensic identification using multidetector CT. Br J Radiol 87(1036):20130468

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Hines E, Rock C, Viner M (2007) Radiography. In: Thompson T, Black S (eds) Forensic human identification. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 221–228

    Google Scholar 

  26. Harris AMP, Wood RE, Nortje CJ, Thomas CJ (1987) The frontal sinus: a forensic fingerprint? A pilot study. J Forensic Odontostomatol 5:9–15

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Quatrehomme G, Biglia E, Padovani B, du Jardin P, Alunni V (2014) Positive identification by X-rays bone trabeculae comparison. Forensic Sci Int 245:e11–4

    Google Scholar 

  28. Campobasso CP, Dell’Erba AS, Belviso M, Di Vella G (2007) Craniofacial identification by comparison of antemortem and postmortem radiographs: two case reports dealing with burnt bodies. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 28(2):182–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gonçalves D, Cunha E, Thompson TJ (2015) Estimation of the pre burning condition of human remains in forensic contexts. Int J Legal Med 129(5):1137–1143. doi:10.1007/500414-014-1027-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cattaneo C, Angelis D, Porta D, Grandi M (2006) Personal identification of cadavers and human reamins. In: Schmitt A, Cunha E, Pinheiro J (eds) Forensic anthropology and medicine. Complementary sciences from recovery to cause of death. Humana Press, Tottowa, pp 359–382

    Google Scholar 

  31. De Angelis D, Sala R, Cantatore A, Grandi M, Cattaneo C (2009) A new computer-assisted technique to aid personal identification. Int J Legal Med 123(4):351–6

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gowland R, Thompson T (2013) Human identity and identification. Cambridge University Press, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Paulozzi LJ, Cox CS, Williams DD, Nolte KB (2008) John and Jane Doe: the epidemiology of unidentified decedents. J Forensic Sci 53(4):922–927

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Anderson BE (2008) Identifying the dead: methods utilized by the Pima County (Arizona) office of the medical examiner for undocumented border crossers: 2001–2006. J Forensic Sci 53(1):8–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ross AH, Lanfear AK, Maxwell AB (2016) Establishing Standards for Side-by-Side Radiographic Comparisons. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 37(2):86–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ciaffi R, Gibelli D, Cattaneo C (2011) Forensic radiology and personal identification of unidentified bodies: a review: Radiol med 116:960–968

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Christensen AM, Crowder CM (2009) Evidentiary standards for forensic anthropology. J Forensic Sci 54(6):1211–1216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Forensic Anthropology Society of Europe. http://www.forensicanthropology.eu. Accessed 17 Nov 2016

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eugénia Cunha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cunha, E., Cattaneo, C. (2017). Historical Routes and Current Practice for Personal Identification. In: Ferrara, S. (eds) P5 Medicine and Justice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67092-8_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics