Abstract
The most widely used methods of impairment rating at the present time are the Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment issued by the American Medical Association, developed from a series of articles in the Journal of the American Medical Association during the period February 1958 to August 1970. This chapter will discuss concerns related to the evaluation of impairment associated with pain and with ‘mental and behavioral disorders’. However, before doing so the most important concerns related to the basic concepts and terminology used in this field of clinical medicine are discussed, namely the usage and meaning of terms such as “impairment”, “disability” and “handicap”. The chapter on the evaluation of impairment associated with “mental and behavioral disorders” in the 6th edition of the AMA Guides requires the use of three instruments, namely: (1) the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale for the rating of symptoms; (2) the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF) from DSM-IV for the rating of ‘psychological, social, and occupational functioning’—it should be noted that the GAF has been “dropped from DSM-5 for among others, its conceptual lack of clarity and questionable psychometrics in routine practice”;—and (3) the mis-named Psychiatric Impairment Rating Scale, which incorrectly includes “Travel” and ‘Employability’ as ratings of psychiatric impairment. The chapter will provide an overview of the Guide to the Evaluation of Psychiatric Impairment for Clinicians (GEPIC), developed in Victoria, Australia, which in our view is the only currently published instrument that rates psychiatric impairment without allowing the rating to be contaminated by what the WHO would consider as aspects of disability and/or handicap using the definitions set out in the ICIDH.
Parts of this chapter are based on previous publications by the authors, especially ‘Mendelson D, The New Law of Torts, 3rd Edition, Oxford University Press, 2014’ and ‘Mendelson G, Survey of methods for the rating of psychiatric impairment in Australia (2004) 11 Journal of Law and Medicine 446’.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Mendelson G (1991) The rating of psychiatric impairment in forensic practice: a review. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 25(1):84–94
Colledge A, Krohm G (2003) Rating of impairments from injury impairment. IAIABC J 4:32–48
Lerner J (1966) Psychiatric disability and the industrial physician. J Occup Med 8:257–260
Meyerson AT, Fine T (eds) (1987) Psychiatric disability: clinical, legal and administrative dimensions. American Psychiatric Press Inc, Washington, DC
World Health Organization (1980) International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps. Geneva
Lasky H (1983) The usable psychiatric report—workers’ compensation style. In: Chan R, Chan B (eds) Workers’ compensation psychiatric evaluation program syllabus. Southern California Psychiatric Society
Fleming JG (1992) The law of Torts, 8th edn. The Law Book Company, Sydney
Yaron R (1966) The goring ox in near Eastern Law (1966). Isr Law Rev 1:396
Honoré T (2003) “Justinian’s codification”. In: Hornblower S, Spawforth A (eds) The Oxford classical dictionary, 3rd edn—Revised
Zimmermann R (1996) The law of obligations. Clarendon Press, Oxford, Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition
Anon (1958) From guesswork to Guideline. JAMA 166(7):781
Luck JV Jr, Florence DW (1988) A brief history and comparative analysis of disability systems and impairment rating guides. Orthop Clin North Am 19(4):839–844
Mulvany P, Horner N (1998) The use and abuse of the American Medical Association guides in accident compensation schemes. J Law Med 6:136
O’Loghlen M (1997) The American Medical Association’s ‘Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment’ in Australia. The standard and departure from the standard. Insur Law J 8:208
Pryor ES (1990) Flawed promises: a critical evaluation of the American Medical Association’s Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment. Harvard Law Rev 103:964–976
Gloss DS, Wardle MG (1982) Reliability and validity of American Medical Association’s guide to ratings of permanent impairment. JAMA 248(18):2292–2296
American Medical Association (1971) Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment. Chicago
American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Washington, DC
American Medical Association (1984) Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment, 2nd ed. Chicago
American Medical Association (1988) Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment, 3rd edn. Chicago
American Medical Association (1993) Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment. Chicago
American Medical Association (2000) Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment. Chicago
American Medical Association (2008) Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment. Chicago
Nussbaum K (1974) Psychiatric disability determination under social security in the United States. Psychiatr Q 48:65
Spaulding WJ (1980) A look at the AMA Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment: problems in workers’ compensation claims involving mental disability. Behav Sci Law 8:361–373
Epstein M, Mendelson G, Strauss N (1997) Clinical guidelines to the rating of psychiatric impairment, published in the Victoria Government. Gazette S87:28 (August 1998)
Epstein M, Mendelson G, Strauss N (2005) The guide to the evaluation of psychiatric impairment for clinicians (GEPIC) published in the Victoria Government. Gazette G30:27 (27 Jul 2006)
Spieler EA, Barth PS, Burton JF Jr, Himmelstein J, Rudolph L (2000) Recommendations to guide revision of the guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment, American Medical Association. JAMA 283(4):519–523
Cocchiarella L, Turk MA, Andersson G (2000) Improving the evaluation of permanent impairment. JAMA 283(4):532–533
Colledge A, Hunter B, Bunkall LD, Holmes EB (2009) Impairment rating ambiguity in the United States: the Utah impairment guides for calculating workers’ compensation impairments. J Korean Med Sci 24(Suppl 2):S232–S241
Maxwell AE (1970) Basic statistics in behavioural research. Penguin Books, Baltimore
Overall JE, Gorham DR (1962) Brief psychiatric rating scale. Psychol Rep 10:79
Overall JE, Hollister LE, Pichot P (1967) Major psychiatric disorders: a four-dimensional model. Arch Gen Psychiatry 16:146
Ventura J et al (1993) Brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS) expanded version (4.0) scales, anchor points and administration manual. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 3:227
Overall JE, Pfefferbaum B (1982) The Brief psychiatric rating scale for children. Psychopharmacol Bull 18(2):10–16
Overall JE, Beller SA (1984) The Brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS) in geropsychiatric research: I. Factor structure on an inpatient unit. J Gerontol 39(2):187–193
Beller SA, Overall JE (1984) The brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS) in geropsychiatric research: II. Representative profile patterns. J Gerontol 39(2):194–200
Silverstein ML, Mavrolefteros G, Close D (1997) BPRS syndrome scales during the course of an episode of psychiatric illness. J Clin Psychol 53(5):455–458
Hopko DR, Averill PM, Small D, Greenlee H, Varner RV (2001) Use of the brief psychiatric rating scale to facilitate differential diagnosis at acute inpatient admission. J Clin Psychiatry 62(4):304–312; quiz 313–314
Zanello A, Berthoud L, Ventura J, Merlo MC (2013) The brief psychiatric rating scale (version 4.0) factorial structure and its sensitivity in the treatment of outpatients with unipolar depression. Psychiatry Res 15;210(2):626–633
American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th edn. Arlington, VA
Davies GR (2008) The psychiatric impairment rating scale: is it a valid measure. Aust Psychol 43:205–212
Davies GR (2013) The reliability of the psychiatric impairment scale (PIRS) in valuing psychological impairment. Psychiatry Psychol Law 20:700–703
Judicial Studies Board for Northern Ireland (2013) The guidelines for the assessment of general damages in personal injury cases in Northern Ireland
Robinson JP, Turk DC, Loeser JD (2004) Pain, impairment, and disability in the AMA guides. J Law Med Ethics 32(2):315–326, 191
Jang SH, Rah UW, Kim YC, Park YS, Jo D, Kim YC, Korean Academy of Medical Sciences (2009) Development of Korean Academy of medical sciences guideline-rating the impairment in pain. J Korean Med 24 Suppl 2:S330–S337
Packard RC, Ham LP (1993) Impairment ratings for posttraumatic headache. Headache 33(7):359–364
Biklen D (1988) The myth of clinical judgment. J Soc Issues 44:127–140
Heiman EM, Shanfield SB (1978) Psychiatric disability assessment: clarification of problems. Compr Psychiatry 19(5):449–454
Government of South Australia (2015) Return to work scheme—impairment assessment guidelines. Adelaide
Cocchiarella L (2003) The art and science of the AMA guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment, 5th edn. J Workers Compensation 12(2):49
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mendelson, G., Mendelson, D. (2017). Current and Future Evidence in Personal Damage Evaluation. In: Ferrara, S. (eds) P5 Medicine and Justice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67092-8_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67092-8_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67091-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67092-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)