Humanitarian Forensic Action. A New Field of Application for Forensic Sciences

Chapter

Abstract

The chapter, divided into three sections, outlines the emerging role of forensic sciences and legal medicine in the humanitarian action, which includes all the interventions aimed at furnishing aid and assistance designed to protect lives and health, alleviate suffering, protect human dignity during and in the aftermath of man-made crises and natural disasters, as well as prevent and strengthen preparedness for the occurrence of such situations. All of the areas and sub-disciplines of forensic science and medicine can profitably be applied in the humanitarian forensic action, in particular forensic anthropology, odontology, genetics, pathology, and clinical legal and forensic medicine. Forensic expertise in human rights protection serves four main purposes: to help families uncover the fate of their loved ones, to collect and document evidence of inhumane crimes, to use that evidence for convicting the offenders, and ultimately to set up new and more efficient prevention strategies.

References

  1. 1.
    Report of the 78th plenary meeting of the General Assembly of the United Nations A/RES/46/182; 19 Dec 1991Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kirschner RH, Hannibal KE (1994) The application of the forensic sciences to human rights investigations. Med Law 13(5–6):451–460PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Choi E, Snow CC (1984) A failure to communicate: the need for standardization of procedures for the exchange of identification information of crime and mass disaster victims. Ann Acad Med Singapore 13(1):8–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Siegel JA, Saukko PJ (eds) (2012) Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences. Academic Press, Elsevier, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Power S (2008) Chasing the flame: Sergio Vieira de Mello and the fight to save the world. Allen Lane/Penguin Books Ltd, UKGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    WHO (1999) ICDH-2. International classification of functioning, disability and health. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sedgwick P (2014) Understanding why “absence of evidence is not evidence of absence”. BMJ 349:g4751CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Directive 2013/33/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 laying down standards for the reception of applicants for international protection (recast) (applicable from 21 July 2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Forensic Medicine, Ethics and Medical LawUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal

Personalised recommendations