Advertisement

Towards Device Interoperability in an Heterogeneous Internet of Things Environment

  • Pavel Pscheidl
  • Richard Cimler
  • Hana Tomášková
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10449)

Abstract

Internet of Things can be viewed as a global network of devices with capabilities of autonomous communication. This is one step ahead of current state, where automatic mutual service communication without human interference is limited. This paper evaluates possibilities of extending nowadays commonly used protocols to achieve higher level of autonomous device communication. It is presumed that fully automatic machine to machine communication and understanding is not yet technologically possible. Several ways of extending current communication protocols by semantic metadata are described and their impact on device communication evaluated.

Keywords

Internet of Things Virtual device Meta-data Protocols Device Interoperability 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The support of the Specific Research Project at FIM UHK is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Atzori, L., Iera, A., Morabito, G.: The internet of things: a survey. Comput. Netw. 54(15), 2787–2805 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Battle, R., Benson, E.: Bridging the semantic web and web 2.0 with representational state transfer (rest). Web Semant.: Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 6(1), 61–69 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O., et al.: The semantic web. Sci. Am. 284(5), 28–37 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, W., Paik, I., Hung, P.C.: Constructing a global social service network for better quality of web service discovery. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 8(2), 284–298 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dragoni, N., Giallorenzo, S., Lafuente, A.L., Mazzara, M., Montesi, F., Mustafin, R., Safina, L.: Microservices: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.04036 (2016)
  6. 6.
    Erl, T.: Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) Concepts, Technology and Design. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Erl, T.: SOA Design Patterns. Pearson Education, Harlow (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fielding, R.T., Taylor, R.N.: Principled design of the modern web architecture. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. (TOIT) 2(2), 115–150 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fowler, M., Lewis, J.: Microservices. Viittattu 28, 2015 (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gea, T., Paradells, J., Lamarca, M., Roldan, D.: Smart cities as an application of internet of things: experiences and lessons learnt in Barcelona. In: 2013 7th International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing (IMIS), pp. 552–557. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gehlbach, S., Sonin, K.: Government control of the media. J. Publ. Econ. 118, 163–171 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., Palaniswami, M.: Internet of things (IoT): a vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 29(7), 1645–1660 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guinard, D., Trifa, V., Mattern, F., Wilde, E.: From the internet of things to the web of things: resource-oriented architecture and best practices. In: Uckelmann, D., Harrison, M., Michahelles, F. (eds.) Architecting the Internet of Things, pp. 97–129. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-19157-2_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hernández-Ramos, J.L., Jara, A.J., Marın, L., Skarmeta, A.F.: Distributed capability-based access control for the internet of things. J. Internet Serv. Inf. Secur. (JISIS) 3(3/4), 1–16 (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kahan, J., Koivunen, M.R., Prud’Hommeaux, E., Swick, R.R.: Annotea: an open RDF infrastructure for shared web annotations. Comput. Netw. 39(5), 589–608 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maximilien, E.M., Wilkinson, H., Desai, N., Tai, S.: A domain-specific language for web APIs and services mashups. In: Krämer, B.J., Lin, K.-J., Narasimhan, P. (eds.) ICSOC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4749, pp. 13–26. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-74974-5_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mitra, P., Wiederhold, G., Kersten, M.: A graph-oriented model for articulation of ontology interdependencies. In: Zaniolo, C., Lockemann, P.C., Scholl, M.H., Grust, T. (eds.) EDBT 2000. LNCS, vol. 1777, pp. 86–100. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). doi: 10.1007/3-540-46439-5_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ngan, L.D., Kanagasabai, R.: Owl-s based semantic cloud service broker. In: 2012 IEEE 19th International Conference on Web Services (ICWS), pp. 560–567. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nogatz, F., Seipel, D.: Implementing GraphQl as a query language for deductive databases in SWI-Prolog using DCGs, quasi quotations, and dicts. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.00626 (2017)
  20. 20.
    Olifer, N., Olifer, V.: Computer Networks: Principles, Technologies and Protocols for Network Design. Wiley, Hoboken (2005)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rochwerger, B., Breitgand, D., Levy, E., Galis, A., Nagin, K., Llorente, I.M., Montero, R., Wolfsthal, Y., Elmroth, E., Caceres, J., et al.: The reservoir model and architecture for open federated cloud computing. IBM J. Res. Dev. 53(4), 1–4 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sheth, A.P.: Changing focus on interoperability in information systems: from system, syntax, structure to semantics. In: Goodchild, M., Egenhofer, M., Fegeas, R., Kottman, C. (eds.) Interoperating Geographic Information Systems. The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science, vol. 495, pp. 5–29. Springer, Boston (1999). doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-5189-8_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sotiriadis, S., Bessis, N., Amza, C., Buyya, R.: Vertical and horizontal elasticity for dynamic virtual machine reconfiguration. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. PP (2016). http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7762944/
  24. 24.
    Stal, M.: Web services: beyond component-based computing. Commun. ACM 45(10), 71–76 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sundmaeker, H., Guillemin, P., Friess, P., Woelfflé, S.: Vision and challenges for realising the Internet of Things. In: EUR-OP, vol. 20 (2010)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Uckelmann, D., Harrison, M., Michahelles, F.: An architectural approach towards the future internet of things. In: Uckelmann, D., Harrison, M., Michahelles, F. (eds.) Architecting the Internet of Things. Springer, Berlin (2011). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-19157-2_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pavel Pscheidl
    • 1
  • Richard Cimler
    • 2
  • Hana Tomášková
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Informatics and ManagementUniversity of Hradec KraloveHradec KraloveCzech Republic
  2. 2.Faculty of Informatics and Management, Center for Basic and Applied Research (CBAR)University of Hradec KraloveHradec KraloveCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations