Intelligent Collective: The Role of Diversity and Collective Cardinality
Nowadays, there appears to be ample evidence that collectives can be intelligent if they satisfy diversity, independence, decentralization, and aggregation. Although many measures have been proposed to evaluate the quality of collective prediction, it seems that they may not adequately reflect the intelligence degree of a collective. It is due to the fact that they take into account either the accuracy of collective prediction; or the comparison between the capability of a collective to those of its members in solving a given problem. In this paper, we first introduce a new function that measures the intelligence degree of a collective. Following, we carry out simulation experiments to determine the impact of diversity on the intelligence degree of a collective by taking into account its cardinality. Our findings reveal that diversity plays a major role in leading a collective to be intelligent. Moreover, the simulation results also indicate a case in which the increase in the cardinality of a collective does not cause any significant increase in its intelligence degree.
KeywordsWisdom of Crowds Intelligent collective Integration computing
This article is based upon work from COST Action KEYSTONE IC1302, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) and partially supported by the projects DArDOS (TIN2015-65845-C3-1-R (MINECO/FEDER)) and SICOMORo-CM (S2013/ICE-3006).
- 2.Surowiecki, J.: The Wisdom of Crowds. Doubleday/Anchor, New York (2005)Google Scholar
- 3.Armstrong, J.S.: How to make better forecasts and decisions: avoid face-to-face meetings. Foresight Int. J. Appl. Forecast. 5, 3–8 (2006)Google Scholar
- 5.Page, S.E.: The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2007)Google Scholar
- 10.Kawamura, H., Ohuchi, A.: Evolutionary emergence of collective intelligence with artificial pheromone communication. In: 26th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, vol. 4, pp. 2831–2836 (2000)Google Scholar
- 11.Wagner, C., Vinaimont, T.: Evaluating the wisdom of crowds. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 11, 724–732 (2010)Google Scholar
- 19.Robert, L., Romero, D.M.: Crowd size, diversity and performance. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1379–1382. ACM, Seoul, Republic of Korea (2015)Google Scholar
- 22.Wagner, C., Suh, A.: The wisdom of crowds: impact of collective size and expertise transfer on collective performance. In: 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 594–603 (2014)Google Scholar
- 23.Cui, R., Gallino, S., Moreno, A., Zhang, D.J.: The operational value of social media information. Available at SSRN (2015)Google Scholar
- 24.Nguyen, V.D., Nguyen, N.T.: A method for improving the quality of collective knowledge. In: Proceedings of ACIIDS, pp. 75–84 (2015)Google Scholar
- 25.Nguyen, V.D., Nguyen, N.T.: An influence analysis of the inconsistency degree on the quality of collective knowledge for objective case. In: Proceedings of ACIIDS, pp. 23–32 (2016)Google Scholar
- 27.Vossen, G.: Big data as the new enabler in business and other intelligence. Vietnam J. Comput. Sci. 1, 1–12 (2013)Google Scholar
- 28.Cao, S.T., Nguyen, L.A.: Query–subquery nets for Horn knowledge bases in first-order logic. J. Inf. Telecommun. 1, 79–99 (2017)Google Scholar