Intelligent Collective: The Role of Diversity and Collective Cardinality

  • Van Du Nguyen
  • Mercedes G. Merayo
  • Ngoc Thanh Nguyen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10448)

Abstract

Nowadays, there appears to be ample evidence that collectives can be intelligent if they satisfy diversity, independence, decentralization, and aggregation. Although many measures have been proposed to evaluate the quality of collective prediction, it seems that they may not adequately reflect the intelligence degree of a collective. It is due to the fact that they take into account either the accuracy of collective prediction; or the comparison between the capability of a collective to those of its members in solving a given problem. In this paper, we first introduce a new function that measures the intelligence degree of a collective. Following, we carry out simulation experiments to determine the impact of diversity on the intelligence degree of a collective by taking into account its cardinality. Our findings reveal that diversity plays a major role in leading a collective to be intelligent. Moreover, the simulation results also indicate a case in which the increase in the cardinality of a collective does not cause any significant increase in its intelligence degree.

Keywords

Wisdom of Crowds Intelligent collective Integration computing 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This article is based upon work from COST Action KEYSTONE IC1302, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) and partially supported by the projects DArDOS (TIN2015-65845-C3-1-R (MINECO/FEDER)) and SICOMORo-CM (S2013/ICE-3006).

References

  1. 1.
    Clemen, R.T.: Combining forecasts: a review and annotated bibliography. Int. J. Forecast. 5, 559–583 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Surowiecki, J.: The Wisdom of Crowds. Doubleday/Anchor, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Armstrong, J.S.: How to make better forecasts and decisions: avoid face-to-face meetings. Foresight Int. J. Appl. Forecast. 5, 3–8 (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nielsen, M.: Reinventing Discovery: The New Era of Networked Science. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Page, S.E.: The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Galton, F.: Vox populi (The wisdom of crowds). Nature 75, 450–451 (1907)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Graefe, A., Armstrong, J.S.: Comparing face-to-face meetings, nominal groups, Delphi and prediction markets on an estimation task. Int. J. Forecast. 27, 183–195 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nguyen, N.T.: Advanced Methods for Inconsistent Knowledge Management. Springer, London (2008)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nguyen, N.T., Sobecki, J.: Using consensus methods to construct adaptive interfaces in multimodal web-based systems. J. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 2(4), 342–358 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kawamura, H., Ohuchi, A.: Evolutionary emergence of collective intelligence with artificial pheromone communication. In: 26th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, vol. 4, pp. 2831–2836 (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wagner, C., Vinaimont, T.: Evaluating the wisdom of crowds. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 11, 724–732 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lorge, I., Fox, D., Davitz, J., Brenner, M.: A survey of studies contrasting the quality of group performance and individual performance. Psychol. Bull. 55, 337 (1958)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gigone, D., Hastie, R.: Proper analysis of the accuracy of group judgments. Psychol. Bull. 121, 149–167 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Larrick, R.P., Soll, J.B.: Intuitions about combining opinions: misappreciation of the averaging principle. Manag. Sci. 52, 111–127 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nguyen, V.D., Merayo, M.G.: Intelligent collective: some issues with collective cardinality. J. Inf. Telecommun. (2017). doi: 10.1080/24751839.2017.1323702 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hong, L., Page, S.E.: Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 16385–16389 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Armstrong, J.S.: Combining forecasts. In: Armstrong, J.S. (ed.) Principles of Forecasting, pp. 417–439. Springer, New York (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Campbell, K., Mínguez-Vera, A.: Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. J. Bus. Ethics 83, 435–451 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Robert, L., Romero, D.M.: Crowd size, diversity and performance. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1379–1382. ACM, Seoul, Republic of Korea (2015)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kelley, T.L.: The applicability of the Spearman–Brown formula for the measurement of reliability. J. Educ. Psychol. 16, 300–303 (1925)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Simons, A.M.: Many wrongs: the advantage of group navigation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 453–455 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wagner, C., Suh, A.: The wisdom of crowds: impact of collective size and expertise transfer on collective performance. In: 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 594–603 (2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cui, R., Gallino, S., Moreno, A., Zhang, D.J.: The operational value of social media information. Available at SSRN (2015)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nguyen, V.D., Nguyen, N.T.: A method for improving the quality of collective knowledge. In: Proceedings of ACIIDS, pp. 75–84 (2015)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nguyen, V.D., Nguyen, N.T.: An influence analysis of the inconsistency degree on the quality of collective knowledge for objective case. In: Proceedings of ACIIDS, pp. 23–32 (2016)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nguyen, N.T., Nguyen, V.D., Hwang, D.: An influence analysis of the number of members on the quality of knowledge in a collective. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 32, 1217–1228 (2017)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vossen, G.: Big data as the new enabler in business and other intelligence. Vietnam J. Comput. Sci. 1, 1–12 (2013)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cao, S.T., Nguyen, L.A.: Query–subquery nets for Horn knowledge bases in first-order logic. J. Inf. Telecommun. 1, 79–99 (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Van Du Nguyen
    • 1
  • Mercedes G. Merayo
    • 2
  • Ngoc Thanh Nguyen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information Systems, Faculty of Computer Science and ManagementWroclaw University of Science and TechnologyWrocławPoland
  2. 2.Department of Sistemas Informáticos y ComputaciónUniversidad Complutense de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations