WINE: Web Integrated Navigation Extension; Conceptual Design, Model and Interface

  • Ivan Soukal
  • Aneta Bartuskova
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10448)


Limitations in the area of web navigation and organization usually lead to poor usability, which further leads to user disorientation and dissatisfaction. In this paper we present WINE (Web Integrated Navigation Extension) as the novel alternative solution for efficient information retrieval. With combining website’s data and local user data, WINE can offer useful navigation options in a consistent stable environment. In the case of missing support, partial solution is offered. One of the main goals of this interface is reducing interaction cost and user disorientation and provide means of personalization in the scope of each website or system.


Web navigation Information retrieval Usability Web interaction Navigation schemes Interaction cost 



This paper was written with the financial support of Specific Research Project “Investments within the Industry 4.0 concept” 2017 at Faculty of Informatics and Management of the University of Hradec Kralove, granted to the Department of Economics. We thank Jan Hruska for help with conducting cost analysis.


  1. 1.
    McDonald, S., Stevenson, R.J.: Navigation in hyperspace: an evaluation of the effects of navigational tools and subject matter expertise on browsing and information retrieval in hypertext. Interact. Comput. 10(2), 129–142 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amadieu, F., Tricot, A., Mariné, C.: Prior knowledge in learning from a non-linear electronic document: disorientation and coherence of the reading sequences. Comput. Hum. Behav. 25(2), 381–388 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fang, X., Holsapple, C.W.: An empirical study of web site navigation structures’ impacts on web site usability. Decis. Support Syst. 43(2), 476–491 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kalbach, J.: Designing web navigation. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol (2007). ISBN 978-0596528102Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rosenfeld, L., Morville, P., Arango, J.: Information Architecture. For the Web and Beyond, 4th edn. O’Reilly Media, Inc., Newton (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lynch, P.J., Horton, S.: Web Style Guide: Basic Design Principles for Creating Web Sites, 3rd edn. Yale University Press, New Haven (2009). ISBN: 978-0300137378Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bartuskova, A., Krejcar, O.: Design requirements of usability and aesthetics for e-learning purposes. In: Sobecki, J., Boonjing, V., Chittayasothorn, S. (eds.) Advanced Approaches to Intelligent Information and Database Systems, pp. 235–245. Springer, Cham (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-05503-9_23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nielsen, J.: Usability 101. Accessed 20 Mar 2016
  9. 9.
    Unal, Z., Unal, A.: Evaluating and comparing the usability of web-based course management systems. J. Inf. Technol. Educ. 10, 1019–1038 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kibaru, F., Dickson-Deane, C.: Model for training usability evaluators of e-learning. In: Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, pp. 517–522 (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mustakerov, I., Borissova, D.: A conceptual approach for development of educational Web-based e-testing system. Expert Syst. Appl. 38, 14060–14064 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hong, L., Chi, E.H., Budiu, R., Pirolli, P., Nelson, L.: a low cost tagging system for foraging of web content. In: Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, AVI 2008, pp. 65–72 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Danielson, D.R.: Web navigation and the behavioral effects of constantly visible site maps. Interact. Comput. 14(5), 601–618 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ware, C.: Visual Thinking for Design. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., Burlington (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leuthold, S., et al.: Vertical versus dynamic menus on the world wide web: eye tracking study measuring the influence of menu design and task complexity on user performance and subjective preference. Comput. Hum. Behav. 27(1), 459–472 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leavitt, M., Shneiderman, B.: Research Based Web Design and Usability Guidelines. Government Printing Office, Washington (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Roth, S.P., Schmutz, P., Pauwels, S.L., Bargas-Avila, J.A., Opwis, K.: Mental models for web objects: where do users expect to find the most frequent objects in online shops, news portals and company web pages? Interact. Comput. 22(2), 140–152 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bartuskova, A., Krejcar, O., Soukal, I.: Framework of design requirements for e-learning applied on blackboard learning system. In: Núñez, M., Nguyen, N.T., Camacho, D., Trawiński, B. (eds.) ICCCI 2015. LNCS, vol. 9330, pp. 471–480. Springer, Cham (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-24306-1_46CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics, Faculty of Informatics and ManagementUniversity of Hradec KraloveHradec KrálovéCzech Republic
  2. 2.Faculty of Informatics and Management, Center for Basic and Applied ResearchUniversity of Hradec KraloveHradec KrálovéCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations