ABM of Civil Violence: ODD Description

  • Carlos M. Lemos
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Complexity book series (BRIEFSCOMPLEXITY)

Abstract

This chapter contains a description of the proposed agent-based model, using the well-known “Overview, Design Concepts and Details” protocol. The model was implemented in NetLogo and is based on the same two types of agents—citizens and law-enforcement—as in Epstein’s model, but “citizen” agents have one subtype (“activist”) used for implementing network influence effects. The salient aspects of the model description are centered on the submodels for the risk perception, the expression of hardship in terms of value-sensitive relative deprivation, endogenous legitimacy feedback and network influence effects, which provide extensions to Epstein’s model. The model includes two networks called group and infl (for “influentials”), to represent two different types of social influence (due to small and highly cohesive groups or “activists,” respectively). Network influences were implemented using a form of dispositional contagion. The chapter also includes an outline of the R scripts for pre- and post-processing the model results, using the RNetLogo package.

Keywords

Agent-based model Large-scale conflict Risk perception Relative deprivation Endogenous legitimacy feedback Network influence effects 

References

  1. 8.
    T.A. Birkland, An Introduction to the Policy Process: Theories, Concepts, and Models of Public Policy Making, 3rd edn. (Routledge, Abingdon, 2015)Google Scholar
  2. 9.
    D. Bischof, Why Arabs Rebel - Relative Deprivation Revisited. Master’s thesis, Fakultät Sozial und Wirtschaftswissenschaften der Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg, 2012Google Scholar
  3. 23.
    J.M. Epstein, Agent_Zero. Toward Neurocognitive Foundations for Generative Social Science (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2013)Google Scholar
  4. 26.
    M. Fonoberova, V.A. Fonoberov, I. Mezic, J. Mezic, P. Jeffrey Brantingham, Nonlinear dynamics of crime and violence in urban settings. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 15(1), (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 28.
    Freedom House, Freedom in the World, Individual Country Ratings and Status. https://freedomhouse.org/report-types/freedom-world, 2015. Accessed 2015-07-13
  6. 33.
    B. Gilley, The meaning and measure of state legitimacy: Results for 72 countries. Eur. J. Polit. Sci. 45, 499–525 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 34.
    B. Gilley, The Right to Rule. How States Win and Lose Legitimacy (Columbia University Press, New York, 2009)Google Scholar
  8. 36.
    V. Grimm, U. Bergern, D.L. DeAngelis, J. Gary Polhill, J. Giskee, S.F. Railsback, The ODD protocol: A review and first update. Ecol. Model. 221(221), 2760–2768 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 37.
    T.R. Gurr, Psychological factors in civil violence. World Politics 20(2), 245–278 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 49.
    B. Milanovic, All the GINIS Dataset, 2014. Accessed 2016-03-28Google Scholar
  11. 53.
    M.E.J. Newman, Power laws, Pareto distribution and Zipf’s law. Contemp. Phys. 46(5), 323–351 (September-October 2005)Google Scholar
  12. 66.
    G. Sharp, From Dictatorship to Democracy, 4th edn. (The Albert Einstein Institution, Boston, 2010)Google Scholar
  13. 70.
    The Fund for Peace, Fragile States Index. http://fsi.fundforpeace.org/data, 2015. Accessed 2015-11-09
  14. 71.
    The Robert S. Strauss Center, Social Conflict Analysis Database. https://www.strausscenter.org/scad.html, 2015. Accessed 2015-07-25
  15. 72.
    J.C. Thiele, R Marries NetLogo: introduction to the RNetLogo package. J. Stat. Software 58(2), 1–41 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 73.
    J.C. Thiele, W. Kurth, V. Grimm, RNetLogo: An R package for running and exploring individual-based models implemented in NetLogo. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3(3), 480–483 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 77.
    U. Wilensky, NetLogo. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modelling (Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 1999)Google Scholar
  18. 78.
    U. Wilensky, NetLogo Rebellion Model (Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlos M. Lemos
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Religion, Philosophy and HistoryUniversity of AgderKristiansandNorway

Personalised recommendations