Abstract
The widespread use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) has enabled the possibility to open a research project to the contributions of non-professional actors (amateurs, students or sometimes even experts without a formal job-title) in the so called “open/citizen science”. Previous studies have shown as also non-professional actors have the potential to provide a valuable contribution also to complex research projects if the environment in which they are engaged is carefully designed. Theoretical frameworks and operative guidelines for developing public engagement activities for citizen science are still evolving and are not exhaustively defined. While designing the public engagement activities for a robotics research project, HeritageBot (HB), we looked for empirical guidelines and theoretical framework that could support our work. The lack of a structured and comprehensive answer to our research needs has been the initial trigger for this article. This paper explores the process of developing collaborative initiatives involving external non-professional actors in a set of HB’s scientific research tasks through a set of public engagement activities. First, we will explore the theoretical framework and the selected methodologies for designing citizen-science strategies. Second, we will describe, through empirical episodes, the action research approach that we followed to develop HB’s public engagement strategy. Finally, we will introduce the progresses in defining an experimental methodology, instrumental to the validation of the defined strategy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Notable example is the “Galaxy Zoo” project which, through the contribution of hundreds of thousands of volunteers categorized more than 50 million galaxies (www.galaxyzoo.org). Gravity Spy is another successful participatory initiative, counting more 8000 volunteers and more than 2 million classifications of gravitational waves detectors’ outputs (https://www.zooniverse.org/projects/zooniverse/gravity-spy).
- 2.
Project’s website: http://inmoov.fr/.
- 3.
Project’s website: http://www.icub.org/.
- 4.
A great example of the interest of public in robotics is the success of the Lego Mindstorms, with numerous websites, many instructional books, a large community of amateurs devoted to the product and even parallel projects aiming at increasing the potentialities of these “toys”.
References
Wilkinson, C., Bultitude, K., Dawson, E.: “Oh yes, robots! People like robots; the robot people should do something”: perspectives and prospects in public engagement with robotics. Sci. Commun. 33(3), 367–397 (2011)
Special Eurobarometer 382 (2012). http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_382_en.pdf
Fecher, B., Friesike, S.: Open science: one term, five schools of thought. In: Bartling, S., Friesike, S. (eds.) Opening Science, pp. 17–47. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_2
Grigorov, I.: FOSTER Open Science Learning Objectives. Zenodo (2015)
Hand, E.: Citizen science: people power. Nature 466(7307), 685–687 (2010)
Brossard, D., Lewenstein, B., Bonney, R.: Scientific knowledge and attitude change: the impact of a citizen science project. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 27(9), 1099–1121 (2005)
Nielsen, M.: Doing science in the open. Phys. World 22(5), 30 (2009)
Nielsen, M.: Reinventing discovery: the new era of networked science. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2012)
Grand, A., Wilkinson, C., Bultitude, K., Winfield, A.F.: Open science a new, “Trust Technology”? Sci. Commun. 34(5), 679–689 (2012)
Puschmann, C.: (Micro)Blogging science? Notes on potentials and constraints of new forms of scholarly communication. In: Bartling, S., Friesike, S. (eds.) Opening Science, pp. 89–106. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_6
Tacke, O.: Open Science 2.0: how research and education can benefit from open innovation and Web 2.0. In: Bastiaens, T.J., Baumöl, U., Krämer, B.J. (eds.) On Collective Intelligence. AISC, vol. 76, pp. 37–48. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14481-3_4
Vision, T.J.: Open data and the social contract of Scientific Publishing. Bioscience 60(5), 330–331 (2010)
Gowers, T., Nielsen, M.: Massively collaborative mathematics. Nature 461(7266), 879–881 (2009)
Whyte, A., Pryor, G.: Open science in practice: researcher perspectives and participation. Int. J. Digit. Curation 6, 199–213 (2011)
Royal Society (Great Britain) and Policy Studies Unit. Science as an open enterprise (2012)
Gezelter, J.D.: Open Science and Verifiability. The Open Science Project, 5 (2011)
Friesike, S., Schildhauer, T.: Open science: many good resolutions, very few incentives, yet. In: Welpe, I.M., Wollersheim, J., Ringelhan, S., Osterloh, M. (eds.) Incentives and Performance, pp. 277–289. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09785-5_17
Goldman, G.: Cautiously Open to Open Science - The Equation (2013). ucsusa.org/gretchen-goldman/cautiously-open-to-open-science-138
Bonney, R., Cooper, C.B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K.V., Shirk, J.: Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. Bioscience 59(11), 977–984 (2009)
Chesbrough, H.: From Open Science to Open Innovation. Institute for Innovation and Knowledge Management, ESADE (2015)
Colella, N.A., Bolici, F.: Public engagement in a research project: designing citizen science activities as part of its business model. In: IEEE’s Global Wireless Summit 2016, Aarhus (2016)
Susman, G., Evered, R.: An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Adm. Sci. Q. 23, 582–603 (1978)
Baskerville, R.L.: Investigating information systems with action research. Commun. AIS 2(3es) (1999)
Ebner, M., Maurer, H.: Can weblogs and microblogs change traditional scientific writing? Future Internet 1(1), 47–58 (2009)
Cribb, J., Sari, T.: Open Science: Sharing Knowledge in the Global Century. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood (2010)
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27, 425–478 (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Colella, N.A., Bolici, F. (2017). How to Design Citizen-Science Activities: A Framework for Implementing Public Engagement Strategies in a Research Project. In: Ceccarelli, M., Cigola, M., Recinto, G. (eds) New Activities For Cultural Heritage. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67026-3_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67026-3_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67025-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67026-3
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)