Design and Characterization of an Indoor Geolocator Using Beacons Captured by Bluetooth to Guide and Position People in a State of Visual Disability

  • Luis Eduardo PallaresEmail author
  • Yesid Díaz-GutierrezEmail author
  • Edgar KrejciEmail author
  • Helmer MuñozEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 742)


Overcoming the barriers to access technology has been one of the main objectives that many institutes have planned for the inclusion of people with some type of disability. The technological developments have innumerable possibilities to create research projects that are inclusive, that is to say that it does not have difficulties to be used by people in a condition of visual disability, to achieve this, it is presented a solution to the problems of localization in Indoor space by using technology that is already available in any mobile phone through the use of Bluetooth Low Energy 4.0 and an application made in Android.


Bluetooth Android Disability Localization indoor 


  1. 1.
    Madhavapeddy, A., Tse, A.: A study of bluetooth propagation using accurate indoor location mapping. In: Beigl, M., Intille, S., Rekimoto, J., Tokuda, H. (eds.) UbiComp 2005. LNCS, vol. 3660, pp. 105–122. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). doi: 10.1007/11551201_7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nirupama Bulusu, J.H.: Adaptive beacon placement. In: 21st International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems 2001, pp. 16–19. IEEE, April 2001. ISBN 0-7695-1077-9Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lau, L., Lee, B.G, Lee, S.-C., Chung, W.Y.: Enhanced RSSI-Based high accuracy real-time user location tracking system for indoor and outdoor eviroments. Int. J. Smart Sens. Int. Syst. 1(2), 1–12 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Oguejiofor, O.S: Outdoor localization system using RSSI measurement of wireless sensor network. Int. J. Innovative Technol. Exploring Eng. (IJITEE) 2, 1–6 (2013). ISSN: 2278-3075Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Patwari, N.: Using proximity and quantized RSS for sensor. In: WSNA 2003 Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Conference on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications, pp. 20–29. ACM, New York (2003). ISBN: 1-58113-764-8Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pahlavan, K.: Wireless communications for office information networks. Commun. Mag. 23(6), 19–27 (1985). IEEECrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hassellöf, D.: Position determination using multiple wireless interfaces. KTH information and Communication Technology, Master of Science thesis, Sweden (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Priyantha, N.B.: The cricket indoor location system, Ph.D. thesis, MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Cambridge, MA (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hashemi, H.: The indoor radio propagation channel. Proc. IEEE 81(7), 943–968 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lin, T.N., Lin, P.C.: Performance comparison of indoor positioning techniques based on location fingerprinting in wireless networks. In: 2005 International Conference on Wireless Networks, Communications and Mobile Computing, 13–16 June 2005, vol. 2, pp. 1569–1574 (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kaemarungsi, K., Krishnamurthy, P.: Modeling of indoor positioning systems based on location fingerprinting, INFOCOM 2004. In: Twenty-third Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, 7–11 March 2004, vol. 2, pp. 1012–1022 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Anastasi, G., Bandelloni, R., Conti, M., Delmastro, F., Gregori, E., Mainetto, G.: Experimenting an indoor bluetooth-based positioning service. In: 23rd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops, ICDSW 2003, pp. 480–483 (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Corporación Unificada Nacional de Educación Superior CUNBogotáColombia

Personalised recommendations