Design of Hybrid Multimodal Logistic Hub Network with Postponement Strategy

Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 514)


This paper suggests a method allowing to design a hybrid logistic hub network in the context of mass customization, postponement being performed in hubs having industrial capabilities in addition to logistic ones. We propose a two-stage mathematical mixed integer linear programming model for: (1) logistic hub network design (2) postponement location in the designed network. The suggested model manages characteristics not yet taken into account simultaneously in the literature: hierarchical logistic structure, postponement strategy, multi-commodity, multi-packaging of goods (raw materials or components vs. final products), multi-period planning. The solutions are compared through service level and logistic costs.


Hybrid logistic hub Postponement Mass customization Service level Hierarchical logistic structure Multi-period Multi-commodity 


  1. 1.
    Alumur, S., Kara, B.Y.: Network hub location problems: the state of the art. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 190(1), 1–21 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang, H.-W., Chena, R.-Q., Li, Y.: Case study on the application of postponement strategy and managerial insights. Asia Pac. Man. Rev. 11(3), 141–153 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lambert, M., Cooper, M.C.: Issues in supply chain management. Ind. Mark. Manag. 29(1), 65–83 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alumur, S.A., Yaman, H., Kara, B.Y.: Hierarchical multimodal hub location problem with time-definite deliveries. Transp. Res. Part E Log. Transp. Rev. 48(6), 1107–1120 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gelareh, S., Monemi, R.N., Nickel, S.: Multi-period hub location problems in transportation. Transp. Res. Part E 75, 67–94 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sohrabi, H., Montreuil, B., Klibi, W.: On comparing dedicated and hyperconnected distribution systems: an optimization-based approach. In: ILS 2016, Bordeaux, France, 1–4 June (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Melo, M.T., Nickel, S., Da Gama, F.S.: Dynamic multi-commodity capacitated facility location: a mathematical modeling framework for strategic supply chain planning. Comput. Oper. Res. 33(1), 181–208 (2006)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alumur, S.A., Kara, B.Y., Karasan, O.E.: Multimodal hub location and hub network design. Omega 40(6), 927–939 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rodriguez, V., Alvarez, M.J., Barcos, L.: Hub location under capacity constraints. Transp. Res. Part E Log. Transp. Rev. 43(5), 495–505 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Albareda-Sambola, M., Fernandez, E., Nickel, S.: Multiperiod location-routing with decoupled time scales. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 217(2), 248–258 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yang, B., Burns, N.: Implications of postponement for the supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Res. 41(9), 2075–2090 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Van Hoek, R.I.: The rediscovery of postponement a literature review and directions for research. J. Oper. Manag. 19(2), 161–184 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mikkola, J.H., Skjøtt-Larsen, T.: Supply-chain integration: implications for mass customization, modularization and postponement strategies. Prod. Plan. Control 15(4), 352–361 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schwartz, F., Voss, S., Ceroni, J.A.: Designing distribution networks taking into account aspects of postponement. In: The Development of Collaborative Production and Service Systems in Emergent Economies, Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Production Research (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schulze, L., Li, L.: Location-allocation model for logistics networks with implementing commonality and postponement strategies. In: Proceedings of the International Multi Conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, vol. 2, pp. 1615–1620 (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Contreras, I., Cordeau, J.-F., Laporte, G.: Stochastic uncapacitated hub location. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 212(3), 518–528 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rieck, J., Ehrenberg, C., Zimmermann, J.: Many-to-many location-routing with inter-hub transport and multi-commodity pickup-and-delivery. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 236(3), 863–878 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Alibeyg, A., Contreras, I., Fernandez, E.: Hub network design problems with profits. Transp. Res. Part E Log. Transp. Rev. 96, 40–59 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gelareh, S., Nickel, S., Pisinger, D.: Liner shipping hub network design in a competitive environment. Transp. Res. Part E Log. Transp. Rev. 46(6), 991–1004 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mohammed VI Polytechnic University – EMINESBenguerirMorocco
  2. 2.Paris Ouest Nanterre UniversityNanterre CedexFrance
  3. 3.LGP/INP, ENITToulouse UniversityToulouseFrance

Personalised recommendations