Rethinking Zoning for People: Utilizing the Concept of the Village



In this chapter, we propose it is time to re-think and re-imagine how we approach zoning. This is especially true for suburban developments. Today, especially in the United States, zoning in suburban areas is being used to segregate and separate the component parts of our communities into distinct zones which are spread out geographically and in most cases require the daily use of an automobile. The negative consequences of this form of development for health, community and the environment are discussed. Using a study of neighborhoods in Dublin, Ireland and its suburbs we examine how professionals and the public view the places they live and connect these perspectives to the manner in which zoning has changed over the course of the twentieth century. Insights from these professionals and the public lead us to propose that planners, engineers and developers be expected to think more about the kinds of walkable village neighborhoods that people seem to be drawn to almost instinctively. We urge that zoning laws be re-purposed to enable the building of communities that people prefer to live in.


  1. Baxandall, R. F., & Ewen, E. (2000). Picture windows: How the suburbs happened. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  2. Bernick, M., & Cervero, R. (1997). Transit villages in the 21st century. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, L. J., Dixon, D., & Gillham, O. (2009). Urban design for an urban century: Placemaking for people. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Brownson, R. C., Hoehner, C. M., Day, K., Forsyth, A., & Sallis, J. F. (2009). Measuring the built environment for physical activity: State of the science. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36(4 Suppl), 99–123. Scholar
  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017). CDC Vital signs motor vehicle crash deaths. Vital signs. Retrieved June 8, 2017, from
  6. Cervero, R. (1998). The transit metropolis: A global inquiry. Washington, DC: Island press.Google Scholar
  7. Cervero, R. (2004). Transit-oriented development in the United States: Experiences, challenges, and prospects (Vol. 102). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.Google Scholar
  8. De Nazelle, A., Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., Antó, J. M., Brauer, M., Briggs, D., Braun-Fahrlander, C., & Hoek, G. (2011). Improving health through policies that promote active travel: A review of evidence to support integrated health impact assessment. Environment International, 37(4), 766–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Department for Transport Tourism and Sport (DTTAS), & Department for Environment Community and Local Government (DECLG). (2013). Design manual for urban roads and streets. Dublin, Ireland: Author.Google Scholar
  10. Department for Transport UK. (2007). Manual for streets. London: Thomas Telford.Google Scholar
  11. Duany, A., Plater-Zyberk, E., & Speck, J. (2000). Suburban nation. New York: North Point Press.Google Scholar
  12. Duany, A., & Talen, E. (2002). Transect planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(3), 245–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dunham-Jones, E., & Williamson, J. (2008). Retrofitting suburbia: Urban design solutions for redesigning suburbs. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  14. Edwards, P., & Tsouros, A. (2006). Promoting physical activity and active living in urban environments. The role of local governments. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO (World Health Organization) Regional Office for Europe. Retrieved from Scholar
  15. Ewing, R., Bartholomew, K., Burden, D., Zimmerman, S., & Brown, L. (2013). Pedestrian & transit—Oriented design (1st ed.). Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute and American Planning Association.Google Scholar
  16. Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2010). Travel and the built environment: A meta-analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(3), 265–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ewing, R., Handy, S. L., Brownson, R. C., Clemente, O., & Winston, E. (2006). Identifying and measuring urban design qualities related to walkability. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 3(Suppl 1), S223–S239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fitzsimons D’Arcy, L. (2013). A multidisciplinary examination of walkability: Its concept, assessment and applicability. Dublin: Dublin City University.Google Scholar
  19. Florida, R. (2005). Cities and the creative class. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Florida, R. (2010). Who's your City?: How the creative economy is making where to live the most important decision of your life. Toronto: Vintage Canada.Google Scholar
  21. Frank, L. D., & Engelke, P. O. (2001). The built environment and human activity patterns: Exploring the impacts of urban form on public health. Journal of Planning Literature, 16(2), 202–218. Scholar
  22. Frank, L. D., Sallis, J. F., Conway, T. L., Chapman, J. E., Saelens, B. E., & Bachman, W. (2006). Many pathways from land use to health: Associations between neighborhood walkability and active transportation, body mass index, and air quality. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(1), 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frank, L. D., Kerr, J., Sallis, J. F., Miles, R., & Chapman, J. (2008). A hierarchy of Sociodemographic and environmental correlates of walking and obesity. Preventive Medicine, 47(2), 172–178. Scholar
  24. Frumkin, H., Frank, L. D., & Jackson, R. J. (2004). Urban sprawl and public health (1st ed.). Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  25. Gallagher, A. (2017). New homes with old fashioned values in D24. The Irish Times. Retrieved from
  26. Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for people (1st ed.). London: Island Press.Google Scholar
  27. Giles-Corti, B., Vernez-Moudon, A., Reis, R., Turrell, G., Dannenberg, A. L., Badland, H., et al. (2016). City planning and population health: A global challenge. The Lancet, 388(10062), 2912–2924. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30066-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Glaeser, E. L., & Kahn, M. E. (2010). The greenness of cities: Carbon dioxide emissions and urban development. Journal of Urban Economics, 67(3), 404–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Glaeser, E. (2011). Triumph of the City: How our greatest invention makes us richer, smarter, greener, healthier, and happier. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  30. Goldberg, A., Leyden, K. M., & Scotto, T. J. (2012). Untangling what makes cities Liveable: Happiness in five cities. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Urban Design and Planning, 165(3), 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Haas, T. (2008). New urbanism and beyond: Designing cities for the future. New York: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
  32. Hogan, M. J., Leyden, K. M., Conway, R., Goldberg, A., Walsh, D., & McKenna-Plumley, P. E. (2016). Happiness and health across the lifespan in five major cities: The impact of place and government performance. Social Science & Medicine, 162, 168–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jackson, R. J., Dannenberg, A. L., & Frumkin, H. (2013). Health and the built environment: 10 years after. American Journal of Public Health, 103(9), 1542–1544. Scholar
  34. Kahn, M. E. (2007). Green cities: Urban growth and the environment. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  35. Kay, J. H. (1997). Asphalt nation: How the automobile took over America, and how we can take it back. New York: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  36. King, A. C., Stokols, D., Talen, E., Brassington, G. S., & Killingsworth, R. (2002). Theoretical approaches to the promotion of physical activity forging a Transdisciplinary paradigm. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(2S), 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lee, I. M., Shiroma, E. J., Lobelo, F., Puska, P., Blair, S. N., & Katzmarzyk, P. T. (2012). Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: An analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet, 380(9838), 219–229. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031-9.
  38. Leinberger, C. B. (2012, May 27). Now coveted: A walkable, convenient place. New York Times sunday review the opinion pages. Retrieved from
  39. Leyden, K. M. (2003). Social capital and the built environment: The importance of Walkable neighborhoods. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 1546–1551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Leyden, K. M., Goldberg, A., & Michelbach, P. (2011). Understanding the pursuit of happiness in ten major cities. Urban Affairs Review, 47(6), 861–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Levine, J. (2010). Zoned out: Regulation, markets, and choices in transportation and metropolitan land use. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Lovasi, G. S., Neckerman, K. M., Quinn, J. W., Weiss, C. C., & Rundle, A. (2009). Effect of individual or neighborhood disadvantage on the association between neighborhood walkability and body mass index. American Journal of Public Health, 99(2), 279–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lynch, K. (1965). Image of the City (2nd ed.). London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  44. McKenzie, E. (1994). Privatopia: Homeowner associations and the rise of residential private government. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Montgomery, C. (2013). Happy city: transforming our lives through urban design. Macmillan.Google Scholar
  46. Morris, J. N., & Hardman, A. E. (1997). Walking to health. Sports Medicine, 23(5), 306–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pfeiffer, D., & Cloutier, S. (2016). Planning for happy neighborhoods. Journal of the American Planning Association, 82(3), 267–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Saelens, B. E., Sallis, J. F., Black, J. B., & Chen, D. (2003). Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: An environment scale evaluation. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 1552–1558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sallis, J. F., Bauman, A., & Pratt, M. (1998). Environmental and policy interventions to promote physical activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 15(4), 379–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sallis, J. F., Saelens, B. E., Frank, L. D., Conway, T. L., Slymen, D. J., Cain, K. L., et al. (2009). Neighborhood built environment and income: Examining multiple health outcomes. Social Science & Medicine, 68(7), 1285–1293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schwieterman, J. P., & Caspall, D. M. (2006). The politics of place: A history of zoning in Chicago. Chicago, IL: Lake Claremont Press.Google Scholar
  52. Southworth, M., & Ben-Joseph, E. (1995). Street standards and the shaping of suburbia. Journal of the American Planning Association, 61(1), 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: National Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (1996). Physical activity and health: A report of the surgeon general. Atlanta, GA: Author. Retrieved from Scholar
  54. Van den Berg, A. E., Maas, J., Verheij, R. A., & Groenewegen, P. P. (2010). Green space as a buffer between stressful life events and health. Social Science and Medicine, 70(8), 1203–1210. Scholar
  55. Walters, D. R. (2007). Designing community: Charrettes, master plans and form-based codes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Warburton, D. E. R., Nicol, C. W., & Bredin, S. S. D. (2006). Health benefits of physical activity: The evidence. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 174(6), 801–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. WHO. (2017). World Health Organization Global Health Observatory data, road traffic deaths. Retrieved June 8, 2017, from
  58. WHO Regional Office for Europe. (2006). Physical activity and health in Europe: Evidence for action. Copenhagen: Author. Retrieved from Scholar
  59. Wickham, J. (2006). Gridlock: Dublin’s transport crisis and the future of the City (1st ed.). Dublin: New Island.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin M. Leyden
    • 1
  • Lorraine Fitzsimons D’Arcy
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Political Science & SociologyNational University of IrelandGalwayIreland
  2. 2.School of Civil and Structural EngineeringCollege of Engineering and Built Environment, Dublin Institute of TechnologyDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations