Advertisement

Exploring the Impact of Shape Complexity on Build Time for Material Extrusion and Material Jetting

  • Patrick PradelEmail author
  • Richard Bibb
  • Zicheng Zhu
  • James Moultrie
Conference paper

Abstract

“Complexity for free” has often been claimed as one of the main opportunities of additive manufacturing (AM). Many examples have proven how, for highly complex and intricate geometries, additive manufacturing is the only available route. However, the implications that shape complexity has on part cost have not been thoroughly explored. This is especially relevant for series production where optimisation of building time can lead to significant cost savings. This study explores how shape complexity impacts build time in Material Extrusion (ME) and Material Jetting (MJ). A screening experiment is presented where the impact of ‘area’, ‘size’ and ‘increase in perimeter’ on build time is analysed. The results show that these three factors influence building time in ME, while only ‘size’ has a significant effect in MJ. Our results challenge the mainstream assumption that all AM processes provide “Complexity for free” while presenting preliminary indications on how to design efficient components for ME and MJ.

Keywords

Design for additive manufacturing Shape complexity Design for cost Costing Additive manufacturing 

References

  1. 1.
    Hague, R.J., Campbell, I., Dickens, P.: Implications on design of rapid manufacturing. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 217, 25–30 (2003). doi: 10.1243/095440603762554587 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gibson, I., Rosen, D.W., Stucker, B.: Additive manufacturing technologies: 3D printing, rapid prototyping, and direct digital manufacturing, First edi (2010). doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1120-9
  3. 3.
    Lipson, H.: The shape of things to come: frontiers in additive manufacturing. In: Frontiers of Engineering, pp. 33–43 (2011). http://www.chinatranslation.net/upload/956445282.pdf
  4. 4.
    Comb, J.: Designing parts for direct digital manufacturing. Adv. Mater. Process. 168, 22–24 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xu, F., Wong, Y.S., Loh, H.T.: Toward generic models for comparative evaluation and process selection in rapid prototyping and manufacturing. J. Manuf. Syst. 19, 283–296 (2001). doi: 10.1016/S0278-6125(01)89001-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baumers, M., Dickens, P., Tuck, C., Hague, R.J.M.: The cost of additive manufacturing: machine productivity, economies of scale and technology-push. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 102, 193–201 (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.02.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pham, D.T., Wang, X.: Prediction and reduction of build times for the selective laser sintering process. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. – Part B – Eng. Manuf. 214, 425–430 (2000). doi: 10.1243/0954405001517739 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Urbanic, R.J., Hedrick, R.: Fused deposition modeling design rules for building large, complex components. Comput. Aided. Des. Appl. 4360, 1–21 (2015). doi: 10.1080/16864360.2015.1114393 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gibson, I., Rosen, D.W., Stucker, B.: Additive manufacturing technologies: rapid prototyping to direct digital manufacturing, Addit. Manuf. Technol. Rapid Prototyp. Direct Digit. Manuf. 1–459 (2010). doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1120-9
  10. 10.
    Mello, C.H.P., Martins, R.C., Parra, B.R., Pamplona, E.D.O., Salgado, E.G., Seguso, R.T.: Systematic proposal to calculate price of prototypes manufactured through rapid prototyping an FDM 3D printer in a university lab. Rapid Prototyp. J. 16, 411–416 (2010). doi: 10.1108/13552541011083326 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grujovic, N., Pavlovic, A., Sljivic, M., Zivic, F.: Cost optimization of additive manufacturing in wood industry. FME Trans. 44, 386–392 (2016). doi: 10.5937/fmet1604386G CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pradel, P., Bibb, R., Zhu, Z., Moultrie, J.: Complexity is not for free: the impact of component complexity on additive manufacturing build time. In: RPDM 2017, n.d.: pp. 1–7Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Montgomery, D.C.: Design and Analysis of Experiments, 6th edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Loughborough Design SchoolLoughborough UniversityLoughboroughUK
  2. 2.Department of EngineeringUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations