Skip to main content

Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment

  • 2192 Accesses

Part of the Contemporary Medical Imaging book series (CMI)

Abstract

Endovascular strategies for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms are discussed in this chapter. These include embolization (e.g., coiling or Onyx infusion), flow diversion, and parent vessel sacrifice. Complications and their avoidance and management are also covered. Imaging techniques for evaluation and follow-up of aneurysms are discussed in the Appendix.

Keywords

  • Intracranial aneurysm embolization
  • Coiling technique
  • Balloon assisted coiling
  • Stent assisted coiling
  • Flow-diversion
  • Complications
  • Parent artery occlusion
  • Aneurysm imaging

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 5.1
Fig. 5.2
Fig. 5.3
Fig. 5.4
Fig. 5.5
Fig. 5.6
Fig. 5.7
Fig. 5.8
Fig. 5.9
Fig. 5.10
Fig. 5.11
Fig. 5.12
Fig. 5.13
Fig. 5.14
Fig. 5.15
Fig. 5.16
Fig. 5.17

References

  1. Yamada NK, Cross DT 3rd, Pilgram TK, Moran CJ, Derdeyn CP, Dacey RG Jr. Effect of antiplatelet therapy on thromboembolic complications of elective coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:1778–82.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Qureshi AI, Suri MF, Khan J, et al. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms by using Guglielmi detachable coils in awake patients: safety and feasibility. J Neurosurg. 2001;94:880–5.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ogilvy CS, Yang X, Jamil OA, et al. Neurointerventional procedures for unruptured intracranial aneurysms under procedural sedation and local anesthesia: a large-volume, single-center experience. J Neurosurg. 2011;114:120–8.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hwang G, Jung C, Park SQ, et al. Thromboembolic complications of elective coil embolization of unruptured aneurysms: the effect of oral antiplatelet preparation on periprocedural thromboembolic complication. Neurosurgery. 2010;67:743–8; discussion 8.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kwon BJ, Im SH, Park JC, et al. Shaping and navigating methods of microcatheters for endovascular treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2010;67:34–40; discussion 40.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kiyosue H, Hori Y, Matsumoto S, et al. Shapability, memory, and luminal changes in microcatheters after steam shaping: a comparison of 11 different microcatheters. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:2610–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ishida W, Sato M, Amano T, Matsumaru Y. The significant impact of framing coils on long-term outcomes in endovascular coiling for intracranial aneurysms: how to select an appropriate framing coil. J Neurosurg. 2016;125:705–12.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Murayama Y, Tateshima S, Gonzalez NR, Vinuela F. Matrix and bioabsorbable polymeric coils accelerate healing of intracranial aneurysms: long-term experimental study. Stroke. 2003;34:2031–7.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Molyneux AJ, Clarke A, Sneade M, et al. Cerecyte coil trial: angiographic outcomes of a prospective randomized trial comparing endovascular coiling of cerebral aneurysms with either cerecyte or bare platinum coils. Stroke. 2012;43:2544–50.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McDougall CG, Johnston SC, Gholkar A, et al. Bioactive versus bare platinum coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: the MAPS (Matrix and Platinum Science) trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35:935–42.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. White PM, Lewis SC, Gholkar A, et al. Hydrogel-coated coils versus bare platinum coils for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms (HELPS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;377:1655–62.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wakhloo AK, Gounis MJ, Sandhu JS, Akkawi N, Schenck AE, Linfante I. Complex-shaped platinum coils for brain aneurysms: higher packing density, improved biomechanical stability, and midterm angiographic outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:1395–400.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Quasar Grunwald I, Molyneux A, Kuhn AL, Watson D, Byrne JV. Influence of coil geometry on intra-aneurysmal packing density: evaluation of a new primary wind technology. Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;44:289–93.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  14. Kallmes DF, Fujiwara NH. New expandable hydrogel-platinum coil hybrid device for aneurysm embolization. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23:1580–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Slob MJ, van Rooij WJ, Sluzewski M. Coil thickness and packing of cerebral aneurysms: a comparative study of two types of coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:901–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kawanabe Y, Sadato A, Taki W, Hashimoto N. Endovascular occlusion of intracranial aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils: correlation between coil packing density and coil compaction. Acta Neurochir. 2001;143:451–5.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sluzewski M, van Rooij WJ, Slob MJ, Bescos JO, Slump CH, Wijnalda D. Relation between aneurysm volume, packing, and compaction in 145 cerebral aneurysms treated with coils. Radiology. 2004;231:653–8.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Slob MJ, Sluzewski M, van Rooij WJ. The relation between packing and reopening in coiled intracranial aneurysms: a prospective study. Neuroradiology. 2005;47:942–5.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Morales HG, Kim M, Vivas EE, et al. How do coil configuration and packing density influence intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32(10):1935–41.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. D’Agostino SJ, Harrigan MR, Chalela JA, et al. Clinical experience with Matrix2 360 degrees coils in the treatment of 100 intracranial aneurysms. Surg Neurol. 2009;72:41–7.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Meyers PM, Lavine SD, Fitzsimmons BF, et al. Chemical meningitis after cerebral aneurysm treatment using two second-generation aneurysm coils: report of two cases. Neurosurgery. 2004;55:1222.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Brisman JL, Song JK, Niimi Y, Berenstein A. Treatment options for wide-necked intracranial aneurysms using a self-expandable hydrophilic coil and a self-expandable stent combination. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:1237–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lubicz B, Lefranc F, Levivier M, et al. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with a branch arising from the sac. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:142–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pakbaz RS, Kerber C, Ghanaati H, Akhlaghpoor S, Shakoori A. A new aneurysm therapy: Neucrylate AN. Neurosurgery. 2010;66:E1030.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pakbaz RS, Shakiba M, Ghanaati H, Akhlaghpoor S, Shakourirad A, Kerber CW. 1-Hexyl n-cyanoacrylate compound (Neucrylate AN), a new treatment for berry aneurysm. III: Initial clinical results. J Neurointerv Surg. 2011;4(1):58–61.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Richards BF, Fleming JB, Shannon CN, Walters BC, Harrigan MR. Safety and cost effectiveness of step-down unit admission following elective neurointerventional procedures. J Neurointerv Surg. 2012;4:390–2.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zakhari N, Lum C, Quateen A, Iancu D, Lesiuk H. Next day discharge after elective intracranial aneurysm coiling: is it safe? J Neurointerv Surg. 2016;8:983–6.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kwee TC, Kwee RM. MR angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroradiology. 2007;49:703–13.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sprengers ME, Schaafsma JD, van Rooij WJ, et al. Evaluation of the occlusion status of coiled intracranial aneurysms with MR angiography at 3T: is contrast enhancement necessary? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30:1665–71.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Agid R, Willinsky RA, Lee SK, Terbrugge KG, Farb RI. Characterization of aneurysm remnants after endovascular treatment: contrast-enhanced MR angiography versus catheter digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:1570–4.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Schaafsma JD, Koffijberg H, Buskens E, Velthuis BK, van der Graaf Y, Rinkel GJ. Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance angiography versus intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography to follow-up patients with coiled intracranial aneurysms. Stroke. 2010;41:1736–42.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pierot LMDP, Barbe CMD, Spelle L, ATENA investigators. Endovascular treatment of very small unruptured aneurysms: rate of procedural complications, clinical outcome, and anatomical results. Stroke. 2010;41:2855–9.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Brinjikji WBS, Lanzino GMD, Cloft HJMDP, Rabinstein AMD, Kallmes DFMD. Endovascular treatment of very small (3 mm or Smaller) intracranial aneurysms: report of a consecutive series and a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2010;41:116–21.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lum C, Narayanam SB, Silva L, et al. Outcome in small aneurysms (<4 mm) treated by endovascular coiling. J Neurointerv Surg. 2011;4(3):196–8.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Jindal G, Miller T, Iyohe M, Shivashankar R, Prasad V, Gandhi D. Small intracranial aneurysm treatment using target ((R)) ultrasoft (™) coils. J Vasc Interv Neurol. 2016;9:46–51.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Goddard JK, Moran CJ, Cross DT 3rd, Derdeyn CP. Absent relationship between the coil-embolization ratio in small aneurysms treated with a single detachable coil and outcomes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:1916–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Pierot L, Cognard C, Spelle L, Moret J. Safety and efficacy of balloon remodeling technique during endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: critical review of the literature. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33:12–5.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kirmani JF, Paolucci U. Ascent: a novel balloon microcatheter device used as the primary coiling microcatheter of a basilar tip aneurysm. J Neuroimaging. 2011;22(2):191–3.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Modi J, Eesa M, Menon BK, Wong JH, Goyal M. Balloon-assisted rapid intermittent sequential coiling (BRISC) technique for the treatment of complex wide-necked intracranial aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol. 2011;17:64–9.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Phatouros CC, Halbach VV, Malek AM, Dowd CF, Higashida RT. Simultaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage and carotid cavernous fistula after rupture of a paraclinoid aneurysm during balloon-assisted coil embolization. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999;20:1100–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Spiotta AMMD, Bhalla TMD, Hussain MSMD, et al. An analysis of inflation times during balloon-assisted aneurysm coil embolization and ischemic complications. Stroke. 2011;42:1051–5.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Cekirge HS, Yavuz K, Geyik S, Saatci I. HyperForm balloon remodeling in the endovascular treatment of anterior cerebral, middle cerebral, and anterior communicating artery aneurysms: clinical and angiographic follow-up results in 800 consecutive patients. J Neurosurg. 2011;114:944–53.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lawson MF, Newman WC, Chi YY, Mocco JD, Hoh BL. Stent-associated flow remodeling causes further occlusion of incompletely coiled aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2011;69:598–604.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hwang G, Park H, Bang JS, et al. Comparison of 2-year angiographic outcomes of stent- and nonstent-assisted coil embolization in unruptured aneurysms with an unfavorable configuration for coiling. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32(9):1707–10.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang C, Tian Z, Liu J, et al. Flow diverter effect of LVIS stent on cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics: a comparison with Enterprise stents and the Pipeline device. J Transl Med. 2016;14:199.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Tumialán LM, Zhang YJ, Cawley CM, Dion JE, Tong FC, Barrow DL. Intracranial hemorrhage associated with stent-assisted coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: a cautionary report. J Neurosurg. 2008;108:1122–9.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kim DJ, Suh SH, Kim BM, Kim DI, Huh SK, Lee JW. Hemorrhagic complications related to the stent-remodeled coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2010;67:73–9.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kung DK, Policeni BA, Capuano AW, et al. Risk of ventriculostomy-related hemorrhage in patients with acutely ruptured aneurysms treated using stent-assisted coiling. J Neurosurg. 2011;114:1021–7.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Heller R, Calnan DR, Lanfranchi M, Madan N, Malek AM. Incomplete stent apposition in Enterprise stent-mediated coiling of aneurysms: persistence over time and risk of delayed ischemic events. J Neurosurg. 2013;118:1014–22.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kono K, Terada T. In vitro experiments of vessel wall apposition between the Enterprise and Enterprise 2 stents for treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Acta Neurochir. 2016;158:241–5.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Lubicz B, Francois O, Levivier M, Brotchi J, Baleriaux D. Preliminary experience with the enterprise stent for endovascular treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms: potential advantages and limiting characteristics. Neurosurgery. 2008;62:1063–9; discussion 9–70.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Lavine SD, Meyers PM, Connolly ES, Solomon RS. Spontaneous delayed proximal migration of enterprise stent after staged treatment of wide-necked basilar aneurysm: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2009;64:E1012; discussion E1012.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Ge H, Lv X, Yang X, He H, Jin H, Li Y. LVIS stent versus enterprise stent for the treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. World Neurosurg. 2016;91:365–70.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Poncyljusz W, Bilinski P, Safranow K, et al. The LVIS/LVIS Jr. stents in the treatment of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms: multicentre registry. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015;7:524–9.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Cordis enterprise™ vascular reconstruction device: Instructions for use. Cordis Neurovascular, Miami Lakes, FL 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Heller RS, Malek AM. Parent vessel size and curvature strongly influence risk of incomplete stent apposition in enterprise intracranial aneurysm stent coiling. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32(9):1714–20.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Hong B, Patel NV, Gounis MJ, et al. Semi-jailing technique for coil embollization of complex, wide-necked intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2009;65:1131–9.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Juszkat R, Nowak S, Smol S, Kociemba W, Blok T, Zarzecka A. Leo stent for endovascular treatment of broad-necked and fusiform intracranial aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol. 2007;13:255–69.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Fischer S, Weber A, Carolus A, Drescher F, Gotz F, Weber W. Coiling of wide-necked carotid artery aneurysms assisted by a temporary bridging device (Comaneci): preliminary experience. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012664.

  60. Baxter BW, Rosso D, Lownie SP. Double microcatheter technique for detachable coil treatment of large, wide-necked intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19:1176–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Terada T, Tsuura M, Matsumoto H, et al. Endovascular treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2005;94:87–91.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Henkes H, Fischer S, Weber W, et al. Endovascular coil occlusion of 1811 intracranial aneurysms: early angiographic and clinical results. Neurosurgery. 2004;54:268–80; discussion 80–5.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Rouchaud A, Brinjikji W, Lanzino G, Cloft HJ, Kadirvel R, Kallmes DF. Delayed hemorrhagic complications after flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms: a literature overview. Neuroradiology. 2016;58:171–7.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Puffer C, Dai D, Ding YH, Cebral J, Kallmes D, Kadirvel R. Gene expression comparison of flow diversion and coiling in an experimental aneurysm model. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015;7:926–30.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Rouchaud A, Johnson C, Thielen E, et al. Differential gene expression in coiled versus flow-diverter-treated aneurysms: rna sequencing analysis in a rabbit aneurysm model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37:1114–21.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Park MS, Nanaszko M, Sanborn MR, Moon K, Albuquerque FC, McDougall CG. Re-treatment rates after treatment with the pipeline embolization device alone versus pipeline and coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: a single-center experience. J Neurosurg. 2016;125:137–44.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Nossek E, Chalif DJ, Chakraborty S, Lombardo K, Black KS, Setton A. Concurrent use of the pipeline embolization device and coils for intracranial aneurysms: technique, safety, and efficacy. J Neurosurg. 2015;122:904–11.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Siddiqui AH, Kan P, Abla AA, Hopkins LN, Levy EI. Complications after treatment with pipeline embolization for giant distal intracranial aneurysms with or without coil embolization. Neurosurgery. 2012;71:E509–13; discussion E513.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Skukalek SL, Winkler AM, Kang J, et al. Effect of antiplatelet therapy and platelet function testing on hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications in patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with the pipeline embolization device: a review and meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016;8:58–65.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Wakhloo AK, Lylyk P, de Vries J, et al. Surpass flow diverter in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:98–107.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Colby GP, Lin LM, Caplan JM, et al. Flow diversion of large internal carotid artery aneurysms with the surpass device: impressions and technical nuance from the initial North American experience. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016;8:279–86.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Lubicz B, Collignon L, Raphaeli G, et al. Flow-diverter stent for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective study in 29 patients with 34 aneurysms. Stroke. 2010;41:2247–53.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Fischer S, Aguilar-Perez M, Henkes E, et al. Initial experience with p64: a novel mechanically detachable flow diverter for the treatment of intracranial saccular sidewall aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:2082–9.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Mohlenbruch MA, Herweh C, Jestaedt L, et al. The FRED flow-diverter stent for intracranial aneurysms: clinical study to assess safety and efficacy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:1155–61.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Horowitz M, Levy E, Sauvageau E, et al. Intra/extra-aneurysmal stent placement for management of complex and wide-necked- bifurcation aneurysms: eight cases using the waffle cone technique. Neurosurgery. 2006;58:ONS-258–62; discussion ONS-62.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Aguilar-Perez M, Kurre W, Fischer S, Bazner H, Henkes H. Coil occlusion of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms assisted by a novel intra- to extra-aneurysmatic neck-bridging device (pCONus): initial experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35:965–71.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Gory B, Spiotta AM, Mangiafico S, et al. PulseRider stent-assisted coiling of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms: periprocedural results in an international series. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37:130–5.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Pierot L, Moret J, Turjman F, et al. WEB treatment of intracranial aneurysms: clinical and anatomic results in the french observatory. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37:655–9.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Papagiannaki C, Spelle L, Januel AC, et al. WEB intrasaccular flow disruptor-prospective, multicenter experience in 83 patients with 85 aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35(11):2106.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Aguilar Perez M, Bhogal P, Martinez Moreno R, Bazner H, Ganslandt O, Henkes H. The Medina Embolic Device: early clinical experience from a single center. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9:77–87.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Turk AS, Maia O, Ferreira CC, Freitas D, Mocco J, Hanel R. Periprocedural safety of aneurysm embolization with the Medina Coil System: the early human experience. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016;8:168–72.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Tan H-Q, Li M-H, Zhang P-L, et al. Reconstructive endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the Willis covered stent: medium-term clinical and angiographic follow-up. J Neurosurg. 2011;114:1014–20.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Li MH, Li YD, Tan HQ, Luo QY, Cheng YS. Treatment of distal internal carotid artery aneurysm with the willis covered stent: a prospective pilot study. Radiology. 2009;253:470–7.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Brilstra EH, Rinkel GJ, van der Graaf Y, van Rooij WJ, Algra A. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by embolization with coils: a systematic review. Stroke. 1999;30:470–6.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Lozier AP, Connolly ES Jr, Lavine SD, Solomon RA. Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of posterior circulation aneurysms: a systematic review of the literature. Stroke. 2002;33:2509–18.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Murayama Y, Nien YL, Duckwiler G, et al. Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: 11 years’ experience. J Neurosurg. 2003;98:959–66.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Singh V, Gress DR, Higashida RT, Dowd CF, Halbach VV, Johnston SC. The learning curve for coil embolization of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23:768–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. McDougall CG, Halbach VV, Dowd CF, Higashida RT, Larsen DW, Hieshima GB. Causes and management of aneurysmal hemorrhage occurring during embolization with Guglielmi detachable coils. J Neurosurg. 1998;89:87–92.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF. Cerebral aneurysm perforations complicating therapy with Guglielmi detachable coils: a meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23:1706–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Ricolfi F, Le Guerinel C, Blustajn J, et al. Rupture during treatment of recently ruptured aneurysms with Guglielmi electrodetachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19:1653–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Doerfler A, Wanke I, Egelhof T, et al. aneurysmal rupture during embolization with guglielmi detachable coils: causes, management, and outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22:1825–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Sluzewski M, Bosch JA, van Rooij WJ, Nijssen PC, Wijnalda D. Rupture of intracranial aneurysms during treatment with Guglielmi detachable coils: incidence, outcome, and risk factors. J Neurosurg. 2001;94:238–40.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Willinsky R, terBrugge K. Use of a second microcatheter in the management of a perforation during endovascular treatment of a cerebral aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:1537–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Farhat HI, Elhammady MS, Aziz-Sultan MA. N-Butyl-2-cyanoacrylate use in intraoperative ruptured aneurysms as a salvage rescue: case report. Neurosurgery. 2010;67:E216–E7.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  95. Soeda A, Sakai N, Sakai H, et al. Thromboembolic events associated with Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of asymptomatic cerebral aneurysms: evaluation of 66 consecutive cases with use of diffusion-weighted MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24:127–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Guglielmi G, Vinuela F, Sepetka I, Macellari V. Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach. Part 1: electrochemical basis, technique, and experimental results. J Neurosurg. 1991;75:1–7.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Vinuela F, Duckwiler G, Mawad M. Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of acute intracranial aneurysm: perioperative anatomical and clinical outcome in 403 patients. J Neurosurg. 1997;86:475–82.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Pelz DM, Lownie SP, Fox AJ. Thromboembolic events associated with the treatment of cerebral aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19:1541–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Workman MJ, Cloft HJ, Tong FC, et al. Thrombus formation at the neck of cerebral aneurysms during treatment with Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23:1568–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Soeda A, Sakai N, Murao K, et al. Thromboembolic events associated with Guglielmi detachable coil embolization with use of diffusion-weighted mr imaging. part ii. detection of the microemboli proximal to cerebral aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24:2035–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Derdeyn CP, Cross DT 3rd, Moran CJ, et al. Postprocedure ischemic events after treatment of intracranial aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils. J Neurosurg. 2002;96:837–43.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Kang DH, Kim BM, Kim DJ, et al. MR-DWI-positive lesions and symptomatic ischemic complications after coiling of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Stroke. 2013;44:789–91.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Ross IB, Dhillon GS. Complications of endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Surg Neurol. 2005;64:12–8.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Kanaan HMD, Jankowitz BMD, Aleu AMD, et al. In-stent thrombosis and stenosis after neck-remodeling device-assisted coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2010;67:1523–33.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Adeeb N, Griessenauer CJ, Moore JM, et al. Ischemic stroke after treatment of intraprocedural thrombosis during stent-assisted coiling and flow diversion. Stroke. 2017;48:1098–100.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Rordorf G, Bellon RJ, Budzik RF Jr, et al. silent thromboembolic events associated with the treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms by use of Guglielmi detachable coils: prospective study applying diffusion-weighted imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22:5–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Bendok BR, Hanel RA, Hopkins LN. Coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2003;52:1125–30; discussion 30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Qureshi AI, Luft AR, Sharma M, Guterman LR, Hopkins LN. Prevention and treatment of thromboembolic and ischemic complications associated with endovascular procedures: Part II—clinical aspects and recommendations. Neurosurgery. 2000;46:1360–75; discussion 75–6.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Ng PP, Phatouros CC, Khangure MS. Use of glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitor for a Thromboembolic complication during Guglielmi detachable coil treatment of an acutely ruptured aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22:1761–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Steinhubl SR, Talley JD, Braden GA, et al. Point-of-care measured platelet inhibition correlates with a reduced risk of an adverse cardiac event after percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the GOLD (AU-Assessing Ultegra) multicenter study. Circulation. 2001;103:2572–8.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Quinn MJ, Plow EF, Topol EJ. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors: recognition of a two-edged sword? Circulation. 2002;106:379–85.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Kleinman N. Assessing platelet function in clinical trials. In: Quinn M, Fitzgerald D, editors. Platelet function assessment, diagnosis, and treatment. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2005. p. 369–84.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  113. Fourie P, Duncan IC. Microsnare-assisted mechanical removal of intraprocedural distal middle cerebral arterial thromboembolism. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24:630–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Cronqvist M, Pierot L, Boulin A, Cognard C, Castaings L, Moret J. Local intraarterial fibrinolysis of thromboemboli occurring during endovascular treatment of intracerebral aneurysm: a comparison of anatomic results and clinical outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19:157–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Henkes H, Lowens S, Preiss H, Reinartz J, Miloslavski E, Kuhne DA. new device for endovascular coil retrieval from intracranial vessels: alligator retrieval device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:327–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Sugiu K, Martin JB, Jean B, Rufenacht DA. Rescue balloon procedure for an emergency situation during coil embolization for cerebral aneurysms. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 2002;96:373–6.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Cognard C, Weill A, Castaings L, Rey A, Moret J. Intracranial berry aneurysms: angiographic and clinical results after endovascular treatment. Radiology. 1998;206:499–510.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Fessler RD, Ringer AJ, Qureshi AI, Guterman LR, Hopkins LN. Intracranial stent placement to trap an extruded coil during endovascular aneurysm treatment: technical note. Neurosurgery. 2000;46:248–51; discussion 51–3.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Fiorella D, Albuquerque FC, Deshmukh VR, McDougall CG. Monorail snare technique for the recovery of stretched platinum coils: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2005;57:E210; discussion E.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Friedman JA, Nichols DA, Meyer FB, et al. Guglielmi detachable coil treatment of ruptured saccular cerebral aneurysms: retrospective review of a 10-year single-center experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24:526–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Raymond J, Guilbert F, Weill A, et al. Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke. 2003;34:1398–403.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Brinjikji W, Shahi V, Cloft HJ, Lanzino G, Kallmes DF, Kadirvel R. Could statin use be associated with reduced recurrence rates following coiling in ruptured intracranial aneurysms? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:2104–7.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. Kang HS, Han MH, Kwon BJ, Kwon OK, Kim SH. Repeat endovascular treatment in post-embolization recurrent intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2006;58:60–70; discussion 60–70.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Adeeb N, Griessenauer CJ, Foreman PM, et al. Use of platelet function testing before pipeline embolization device placement: a multicenter cohort study. Stroke. 2017;48(5):1322–30.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Kallmes DF, Hanel R, Lopes D, et al. International retrospective study of the pipeline embolization device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:108–15.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Cebral JR, Mut F, Raschi M, et al. Aneurysm rupture following treatment with flow-diverting stents: computational hemodynamics analysis of treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32:27–33.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Kulcsar Z, Houdart E, Bonafe A, et al. Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32:20–5.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Hu YC, Deshmukh VR, Albuquerque FC, et al. Histopathological assessment of fatal ipsilateral intraparenchymal hemorrhages after the treatment of supraclinoid aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device. J Neurosurg. 2014;120:365–74.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Mitha AP, Mynard JP, Storwick JA, Shivji ZI, Wong JH, Morrish W. Can the windkessel hypothesis explain delayed intraparenchymal haemorrhage after flow diversion? A case report and model-based analysis of possible mechanisms. Heart Lung Circ. 2015;24:824–30.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Chalouhi N, Tjoumakaris SI, Gonzalez LF, et al. Spontaneous delayed migration/shortening of the pipeline embolization device: report of 5 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34:2326–30.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. McAuliffe W, Wenderoth JD. Immediate and midterm results following treatment of recently ruptured intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33:487–93.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Mihlon F, Agrawal A, Nimjee SM, et al. Enhanced, rapid occlusion of carotid and vertebral arteries using the AMPLATZER Vascular Plug II device: the Duke Cerebrovascular Center experience in 8 patients with 22 AMPLATZER vascular plug II devices. World Neurosurg. 2015;83:62–8.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Bederson JB, Connolly ES Jr, Batjer HH, et al. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Stroke. 2009;40:994–1025.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. van der Wee N, Rinkel GJ, Hasan D, van Gijn J. Detection of subarachnoid haemorrhage on early CT: is lumbar puncture still needed after a negative scan? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1995;58:357–9.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  135. Provenzale JM, Hacein-Bey L. CT evaluation of subarachnoid hemorrhage: a practical review for the radiologist interpreting emergency room studies. Emerg Radiol. 2009;16:441–51.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Hino A, Fujimoto M, Iwamoto Y, Yamaki T, Katsumori T. False localization of rupture site in patients with multiple cerebral aneurysms and subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 2000;46:825–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Karttunen AI, Jartti PH, Ukkola VA, Sajanti J, Haapea M. Value of the quantity and distribution of subarachnoid haemorrhage on CT in the localization of a ruptured cerebral aneurysm. Acta Neurochir. 2003;145:655–61; discussion 61.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Tryfonidis M, Evans AL, Coley SC, et al. The value of radio-anatomical features on non-contrast CT scans in localizing the source in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Clin Anat. 2007;20:618–23.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. Fisher CM, Kistler JP, Davis JM. Relation of cerebral vasospasm to subarachnoid hemorrhage visualized by computerized tomographic scanning. Neurosurgery. 1980;6:1–9.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Pasqualin A, Bazzan A, Cavazzani P, Scienza R, Licata C, Da Pian R. Intracranial hematomas following aneurysmal rupture: experience with 309 cases. Surg Neurol. 1986;25:6–17.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Thai QA, Raza SM, Pradilla G, Tamargo RJ. Aneurysmal rupture without subarachnoid hemorrhage: case series and literature review. Neurosurgery. 2005;57:225–9; discussion 225–9.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Flint AC, Roebken A, Singh V. Primary intraventricular hemorrhage: yield of diagnostic angiography and clinical outcome. Neurocrit Care. 2008;8:330–6.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Kallmes DF, Layton K, Marx WF, Tong F. Death by nondiagnosis: why emergent CT angiography should not be done for patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:1837–8.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Moran CJ. Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: DSA versus CT angiography—is the answer available? Radiology. 2011;258:15–7.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Fifi JT, Meyers PM, Lavine SD, et al. Complications of modern diagnostic cerebral angiography in an academic medical center. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20:442–7.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Prestigiacomo CJ, Sabit A, He W, Jethwa P, Gandhi C, Russin J. Three dimensional CT angiography versus digital subtraction angiography in the detection of intracranial aneurysms in subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurointerv Surg. 2010;2:385–9.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Menke J, Larsen J, Kallenberg K. Diagnosing cerebral aneurysms by computed tomographic angiography: meta-analysis. Ann Neurol. 2011;69:646–54.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. Sailer AM, Wagemans BA, Nelemans PJ, de Graaf R, van Zwam WH. Diagnosing intracranial aneurysms with MR angiography: systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2014;45:119–26.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. Bruneau M, Rynkowski M, Smida-Rynkowska K, Brotchi J, De Witte O, Lubicz B. Long-term follow-up survey reveals a high yield, up to 30% of patients presenting newly detected aneurysms more than 10 years after ruptured intracranial aneurysms clipping. Neurosurg Rev. 2011;34:485–96.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. Wallace RC, Karis JP, Partovi S, Fiorella D. Noninvasive imaging of treated cerebral aneurysms, Part II: CT angiographic follow-up of surgically clipped aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:1207–12.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  151. Sagara Y, Kiyosue H, Hori Y, Sainoo M, Nagatomi H, Mori H. Limitations of three-dimensional reconstructed computerized tomography angiography after clip placement for intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2005;103:656–61.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. van der Schaaf IC, Velthuis BK, Wermer MJ, et al. Multislice computed tomography angiography screening for new aneurysms in patients with previously clip-treated intracranial aneurysms: feasibility, positive predictive value, and interobserver agreement. J Neurosurg. 2006;105:682–8.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. Dehdashti AR, Binaghi S, Uske A, Regli L. Comparison of multislice computerized tomography angiography and digital subtraction angiography in the postoperative evaluation of patients with clipped aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2006;104:395–403.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. Chen W, Yang Y, Qiu J, Peng Y, Xing W. Sixteen-row multislice computerized tomography angiography in the postoperative evaluation of patients with intracranial aneurysms. Br J Neurosurg. 2008;22:63–70.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. Thines L, Dehdashti AR, Howard P, et al. Postoperative assessment of clipped aneurysms with 64-slice computerized tomography angiography. Neurosurgery. 2010;67:844–53; discussion 53–4.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  156. Tomura N, Sakuma I, Otani T, et al. Evaluation of postoperative status after clipping surgery in patients with cerebral aneurysm on 3-dimensional-CT angiography with elimination of clips. J Neuroimaging. 2011;21:10–5.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. Fukuda K, Higashi T, Okawa M, Iwaasa M, Yoshioka T, Inoue T. White-collar sign as a predictor of outcome after endovascular treatment for cerebral aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2017;126:831–7.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  158. Wallace RC, Karis JP, Partovi S, Fiorella D. Noninvasive imaging of treated cerebral aneurysms, part I: MR angiographic follow-up of coiled aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:1001–8.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  159. Khan R, Wallace RC, Fiorella DJ. Magnetic resonance angiographic imaging follow-up of treated intracranial aneurysms. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;19:231–9.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  160. Kaufmann TJ, Huston J 3rd, Cloft HJ, et al. A prospective trial of 3T and 1.5T time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced MR angiography in the follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31:912–8.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. Lubicz B, Levivier M, Sadeghi N, Emonts P, Baleriaux D. Immediate intracranial aneurysm occlusion after embolization with detachable coils: a comparison between MR angiography and intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography. J Neuroradiol. 2007;34:190–7.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  162. Ferre JC, Carsin-Nicol B, Morandi X, et al. Time-of-flight MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the imaging follow-up of 51 intracranial aneurysms treated with coils. Eur J Radiol. 2009;72:365–9.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  163. Cure’ JK. Brain MRA protocol for coiled aneurysms. Birmingham, AL. 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  164. Spetzler RF, McDougall CG, Zabramski JM, et al. The barrow ruptured aneurysm trial: 6-year results. J Neurosurg. 2015;123:609–17.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  165. Molyneux AJ, Birks J, Clarke A, Sneade M, Kerr RS. The durability of endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: 18 year follow-up of the UK cohort of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Lancet. 2015;385:691–7.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  166. Lindgren AE, Raisanen S, Bjorkman J, et al. De novo aneurysm formation in carriers of saccular intracranial aneurysm disease in eastern finland. Stroke. 2016;47:1213–8.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  167. Wang JY, Smith R, Ye X, et al. Serial imaging surveillance for patients with a history of intracranial aneurysm: risk of de novo aneurysm formation. Neurosurgery. 2015;77:32–42; discussion 42–3.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  168. Campi A, Ramzi N, Molyneux AJ, et al. Retreatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients randomized by coiling or clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Stroke. 2007;38:1538–44.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  169. Lecler A, Raymond J, Rodriguez-Regent C, et al. Intracranial aneurysms: recurrences more than 10 years after endovascular treatment-a prospective cohort study, systematic review, and meta-analysis. Radiology. 2015;277:173–80.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  170. Raabe A, Beck J, Gerlach R, Zimmermann M, Seifert V. Near-infrared indocyanine green video angiography: a new method for intraoperative assessment of vascular flow. Neurosurgery. 2003;52:132–9; discussion 9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  171. Hanggi D, Etminan N, Steiger HJ. The impact of microscope-integrated intraoperative near-infrared indocyanine green videoangiography on surgery of arteriovenous malformations and dural arteriovenous fistulae. Neurosurgery. 2010;67:1094–103; discussion 103–4.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  172. Schuette AJ, Cawley CM, Barrow DL. Indocyanine green videoangiography in the management of dural arteriovenous fistulae. Neurosurgery. 2010;67:658–62; discussion 62.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  173. Awano T, Sakatani K, Yokose N, et al. Intraoperative EC-IC bypass blood flow assessment with indocyanine green angiography in moyamoya and non-moyamoya ischemic stroke. World Neurosurg. 2010;73:668–74.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  174. Woitzik J, Pena-Tapia PG, Schneider UC, Vajkoczy P, Thome C. Cortical perfusion measurement by indocyanine-green videoangiography in patients undergoing hemicraniectomy for malignant stroke. Stroke. 2006;37:1549–51.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  175. Ferroli P, Acerbi F, Albanese E, et al. Application of intraoperative indocyanine green angiography for CNS tumors: results on the first 100 cases. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2011;109:251–7.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  176. Kim EH, Cho JM, Chang JH, Kim SH, Lee KS. Application of intraoperative indocyanine green videoangiography to brain tumor surgery. Acta Neurochir. 2011;153:1487–95; discussion 94–5.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  177. Killory BD, Nakaji P, Maughan PH, Wait SD, Spetzler RF. Evaluation of angiographically occult spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae with surgical microscope-integrated intraoperative near-infrared indocyanine green angiography: report of 3 cases. Neurosurgery. 2011;68:781–7; discussion 7.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  178. Trinh VT, Duckworth EA. Surgical excision of filum terminale arteriovenous fistulae after lumbar fusion: Value of indocyanine green and theory on origins (a technical note and report of two cases). Surg Neurol Int. 2011;2:63.

    CrossRef  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  179. Oh JK, Shin HC, Kim TY, et al. Intraoperative indocyanine green video-angiography: spinal dural arteriovenous fistula. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;

    Google Scholar 

  180. Chen SF, Kato Y, Oda J, et al. The application of intraoperative near-infrared indocyanine green videoangiography and analysis of fluorescence intensity in cerebrovascular surgery. Surg Neurol Int. 2011;2:42.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  181. Hope-Ross M, Yannuzzi LA, Gragoudas ES, et al. Adverse reactions due to indocyanine green. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:529–33.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  182. Kuroda K, Kinouchi H, Kanemaru K, et al. Intra-arterial injection fluorescein videoangiography in aneurysm surgery. Neurosurgery. 2013;72:ons141–50; discussion ons50.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  183. Raabe A, Beck J, Seifert V. Technique and image quality of intraoperative indocyanine green angiography during aneurysm surgery using surgical microscope integrated near-infrared video technology. Zentralbl Neurochir. 2005;66:1–6; discussion 7–8.

    CrossRef  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendix 5.1: Primer on Imaging of Intracranial Aneurysms

Appendix 5.1: Primer on Imaging of Intracranial Aneurysms

Imaging techniques for intracranial aneurysms include CTA, MRA, catheter angiography, and indocyanine green videoangiography. Evaluation of suspected aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage typically begins with non-contrast computed tomography.

1.1 Computed Tomography

Non-contrast computed tomography (CT) is the first-line imaging modality for patients suspected of having an aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. The most common diagnostic error leading to failure to correctly diagnose SAH is failure to obtain a non-contrast brain CT [133]. Using xanthochromia on lumbar puncture as the gold standard, CT performed on a third-generation scanner was 98% sensitive for detecting SAH within 12 h of symptom onset [134]. The sensitivity of CT for SAH decreases with time after the hemorrhage and with small-volume hemorrhages [135]. The most common cause of rebleeding soon after aneurysm surgery is failure to obliterate the offending aneurysm, and this in turn is most commonly due to failure to identify the aneurysm at angiography [136]. The thickness and distribution of the intracranial hemorrhage and aneurysm contour are useful in predicting the site of the offending aneurysm on subsequent angiography [137, 138]. The amount of subarachnoid blood on CT (Fisher scale) correlates with the risk of vasospasm [139]. While most aneurysm ruptures produce subarachnoid hemorrhage, aneurysms that have become adherent to the brain surface may produce both subarachnoid and intraparenchymal hemorrhage [140], entirely intraparenchymal hemorrhage [141], or more rarely primarily intraventricular hemorrhage [142]. CT in a substantial number of patients with non-aneurysmal SAH demonstrates a characteristic pattern of SAH surrounding the midbrain, the so-called perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage pattern.

1.2 Catheter Angiography

Conventional catheter digital subtraction angiography, more recently supplemented with 3D rotational angiography, is still regarded as the gold standard for imaging of intracranial aneurysms [133]. It is considered by many to be the initial study of choice for evaluation of the patient with SAH, particularly in centers with 24/7 availability of a dedicated neurointerventional team [143, 144]. DSA provides the highest spatial resolution (0.124 mm pixel size) [135] and is the optimal imaging technique for preoperative assessment of aneurysm anatomy and for evaluating morphologic features that have a direct bearing on endovascular or open surgical treatment [143]. The complication rate for catheter angiography by neurointerventionalists in an academic setting has been estimated at 0.3% [145]. No source of hemorrhage is identified in up to 25% of initial catheter angiograms performed for SAH. Repeat catheter angiography discovers an initially unidentified aneurysm in an additional 1–2% of cases [133].

1.3 CT Angiography (CTA)

CT angiography employs a thin-slice high resolution rapidly acquired helical CT scan of the brain during the rapid intravenous infusion (bolus) of 80–120 cm3 of iodinated contrast material. Imaging is performed during peak arterial opacification, ideally before significant venous opacification occurs. Submillimeter thickness slices can be achieved on modern multi-detector CT scanners with a maximum pixel size of 0.35 mm [135]. Scan time depends on the number of available detectors, but is less than 1 min for a 64-detector scanner with coverage from the foramen magnum to the vertex. Scanners with up to 320 detectors are currently available (Toshiba Aquilion One), the latter enabling whole-brain coverage with a single rotation of the CT gantry. Finally, a CTA evaluation can be initiated and completed immediately upon detection of SAH on a non-contrast CT study. This can be accomplished far more quickly than a neurointerventional team can be mobilized to complete a conventional angiogram under the best of circumstances.

The acquired images are reconstructed and available for multiplanar and 3D viewing at the CT scanner console within approximately 5 min, although network transmission via a PACS system for enterprise-wide review requires a variably longer time interval. The resulting axial source images are reviewed on a PACS viewing station. This is followed by a review of 2D maximum intensity projection (MIP) sliding slabs in the coronal, axial, and sagittal planes and of color 3D volume-rendered images on an integrated thin client 3D workstation. Review of the source images and 2D reconstructions is particularly helpful for detecting aneurysms that are near or within bone (i.e., in or near the skull base and anterior clinoid processes). 2D reformatted and 3D volume-rendered images can be generated to optimally demonstrate the relationship of the aneurysm to adjacent vascular (e.g., parent artery, adjacent perforating vessels) or osseous structures (e.g. the anterior clinoid process), but review of the source images is essential.

Several recent studies have supported the use of CTA as the initial imaging modality for suspected intracranial aneurysms. In a recent study of 179 patients (with 239 DSA-documented aneurysms) presenting with SAH to a single institution who underwent CTA and DSA, sensitivity of CTA was 99.6% and specificity was 100% [146]. Notably, 19% of the aneurysms in this study were ≤2.9 mm. A recent meta-analysis of 45 studies comparing CTA to DSA for detection of suspected intracranial aneurysms found an overall sensitivity of 97.2% for CTA (95% CI, 95.8–98.2%). CTA specificity was 97.9% (95.7–99.0). Subgroup analysis demonstrated significantly greater sensitivity for 16- and 64-detector CT scanners than for single- or four-detector scanners, especially for smaller (≤4 mm) aneurysms. This was most likely linked to the availability of thinner (submillimeter) slices on the 16- and 64-detector CT scanners [147]. Factors affecting the sensitivity and specificity of CTA for aneurysm detection include aneurysm size and location, vascular tortuosity, radiologist experience, and mode of image acquisition and presentation [133]. CTA advantages compared to DSA include ability to demonstrate mural calcification, intraluminal thrombus, orientation of the aneurysm with respect to intraparenchymal hemorrhage, and relationship of the aneurysm to adjacent bony structures. Disadvantages include concealment of aneurysms by bony structures or aneurysm clips and decreased ability to demonstrate small vessels [133].

1.4 MR Angiography (MRA)

3D time-of-flight (3D TOF) MR angiography is the most commonly used MR angiographic technique for imaging intracranial aneurysms. This technique is based on a T1-weighted 3D-Fourier transform spoiled gradient echo MRI sequence (3D-SPGR). Here, the combined use of a short TR and small flip angle produces location-specific signal suppression in stationary tissues due to saturation. Inflowing blood that has not experienced these repeated RF pulses appears bright in contrast to the stationary background tissue. The individual imaging slices obtained in this fashion are subjected to a maximum intensity projection algorithm that creates a three-dimensional angiogram. The data can also be subjected to 3D volume rendering similar to that employed in CT angiographic post-processing.

Advantages of MRA include no requirement for injected contrast (beneficial in patients with renal failure or pregnancy). Use of MR angiography may be limited by patient stability, inability to remain motionless for the study, or contraindications to MRI, in particular implanted ferromagnetic surgical devices or pacemakers. While modern non-ferromagnetic aneurysm clips and endovascular coils are not contraindications to MRI/MRA, local field distortions and susceptibility effects produced by aneurysm clips compromise vascular analysis in the immediate region of the device as well as downstream from the device. A recent systematic review of MRA for detecting aneurysms found a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 95% and 89%, respectively [148]. Sensitivity is greatest with larger aneurysms and least in the detection of aneurysms at the skull base and in the MCA [133, 148]. Considering the many logistical barriers to MR scanning of unstable patients in the acute setting and generally higher sensitivity and spatial resolution of CTA and conventional angiography, CTA is the primary noninvasive modality for aneurysm diagnosis at most centers.

1.5 Follow-Up of Treated Aneurysms

Follow-up imaging of treated aneurysms is standard for both clipping and coiling. Imaging is necessary to ensure adequate treatment of the aneurysm, and long-term follow-up imaging has the additional advantage of identifying de novo aneurysm formation, which occurs in patients with a history of aneurysmal SAH at a rate of 1–2% per year [133, 149]. DSA remains the gold standard for follow-up imaging of both clipped and coiled aneurysms [150]. CTA can provide adequate imaging of some previously clipped aneurysms, but beam-hardening and streak artifacts preclude effective post-coiling evaluation. MRA can provide excellent imaging of coiled aneurysms but is useless with clipped aneurysms because of artifact. The authors of this handbook use DSA for immediate postoperative assessment of clipped aneurysms and MRA for routine surveillance imaging of coiled aneurysms. See below for a discussion of the length of time necessary for routine surveillance imaging.

1.6 Follow-Up of Clipped Aneurysms: CTA

Early posttreatment goals for post-clipping angiography include assessing completeness of aneurysm occlusion, ruling out arterial narrowing or occlusion by the aneurysm clip, and evaluating for possible vasospasm. Late goals of imaging in clipped aneurysms include assessing the stability of the clipped aneurysm and ruling out de novo aneurysms in other intracranial arteries [150]. Susceptibility artifacts generated by aneurysm clips limit the use of MRA for evaluation of clipped aneurysms. Anatomy in the region of the clipped aneurysm and flow within arteries located downstream from the clip-related artifact are often impossible to visualize due to these effects. DSA or CTA is therefore required for follow-up of these patients. Recently, CTA has been assuming a larger role in post-clipping evaluation. Reports comparing CTA to DSA for detection of post-clip aneurysm residuals have yielded variable results that may reflect differences in the types of aneurysm clips employed and different MDCT systems and scanning and post-processing techniques. CTA is less useful in patients in whom multiple surgical clips have been used for reconstruction, or in patients with cobalt alloy-containing clips [151, 152]. Reported CTA sensitivities for aneurysm remnants have tended to be highest (100%) in studies where only titanium clips were used [153, 154]. A recent series of 31 consecutive patients undergoing both DSA and 64-detector CTA after aneurysm clipping with a variety of aneurysm clips (including cobalt-alloy clips) found an overall CTA sensitivity and specificity of only 50% and 100%, respectively, for aneurysm remnants. When only considering remnants measuring >2 mm on DSA, the sensitivity and specificity of CTA improved to 67% and 100%, respectively. The authors noted: “Conventional DSA remains the most accurate postoperative radiological examination to evaluate the quality of the clipping in every circumstance.” [155] The sensitivity of CTA for evaluating vessel patency adjacent to the clipped aneurysm is also lower than that of DSA [153, 155]. Post-processed CTA data in which clips have been digitally removed with a bone removal software package improves the sensitivity of CTA for detection of postoperative aneurysm residual [156].

1.7 Follow-Up of Coiled Aneurysms: Catheter Angiography

Catheter angiography for routine follow-up of endovascular treated aneurysms is obsolete because of the accuracy and advantages of MRA. Catheter angiography is appropriate in selected cases in which retreatment is anticipated and for aneurysms that are more complex than usual, such as dissecting aneurysms. The white collar sign is a radiolucent gap between the coil mass and the parent artery on DSA; it is present in some 15% of cases and is associated with complete aneurysm occlusion [157].

1.8 Follow-Up of Coiled Aneurysms: MRA

MRA is well suited for noninvasive follow-up of coiled aneurysms since coil-related artifacts on MR are mild and can be minimized with use of short echo time (TE) 3DTOF MRA acquisitions and/or contrast-enhanced MRA [158, 159]. Contrast-enhanced MRA is performed with a very short TE that minimizes susceptibility effects produced by aneurysm coils and signal loss due to turbulent flow (intravoxel phase dispersion). Intravascular contrast also reduces signal loss due to these factors and reduces the loss of signal in slowly flowing blood that occurs due to spin saturation [160]. Finally, use of elliptic centric view-order sampling of K-space enables data filling of the central portions of K-space responsible for image contrast during early arterial phase of the gadolinium injection, helping to reduce the effects of venous contamination. While some studies have found no added benefit of contrast administration for MRA of coiled aneurysms [29], others have found contrast-enhanced centric phase-encoded MRA more sensitive for residual flow in coiled aneurysms [160], and especially aneurysms treated with stent-assisted coiling [161]. Residual aneurysm filling may be difficult to detect within coiled aneurysms with DSA (the gold standard) against the opaque coil mass or due to subtraction artifacts. Therefore, it is difficult to compare sensitivity of MRA vs. DSA. Some have observed that contrast-enhanced MRA [30] or 3DTOF MRA at 3 T may actually demonstrate contrast filling within the coil mass more clearly than DSA [162]. Finally, use of MRA (including contrast-enhanced MRA) has been found to be more cost effective than follow-up with intra-arterial DSA [31].

MRA protocol for imaging of coiled aneurysms: [163]

  • NVPA coil

  • Axial plane

  • Pulse sequence: Vascular TOF SPGR

  • Imaging options: Variable bandwidth, Fast, 2ip512, Zip2, Smart Prep

  • TE: Minimum

  • Flip angle: 45

  • Bandwidth: 41.67

  • Freq: 320

  • Phase: 224

  • Nex: 1

  • Phase FOV: 0.75

  • Scan time: 1:01

  • FOV: 22

  • Slice thickness: 1.4

  • LOCS per slab: 60

  • Frequency direction: AP

  • User CV screen

  • Maximum monitor period: 30

  • Image acquisition delay: 5

  • Turbo mode (1) Faster

  • Elliptical centric (1) on

1.9 How Long Is Routine Surveillance of Aneurysms Treated with Endovascular Techniques Necessary?

  1. 1.

    Routine surveillance imaging of coiled and stented aneurysms is necessary for the following reasons:

    1. (a)

      Aneurysm recurrence requiring further treatment.

      1. (i)

        In the Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial (BRAT), 4.6% of patients in the coiling arm went on to have retreatment [164].

    2. (b)

      Rebleeding risk due to aneurysm recurrence.

      1. (i)

        The annual risk of rebleeding in ISAT after coiling was 0.08% [165].

    3. (c)

      The possibility of de novo (i.e., newly detected) aneurysm formation.

      1. (i)

        De novo aneurysms have been found at rates ranging from 0.23 to 1.14% per year [166, 167].

  2. 2.

    How to follow?

    1. (a)

      The authors of this handbook favor MRA for all routine surveillance imaging and reserve catheter angiogram for cases in which MRI is contraindicated or when there is a high suspicion of a need for retreatment.

  3. 3.

    How often to follow?

    1. (a)

      Most cases of aneurysm recanalization requiring retreatment occur in the first 18 months after the initial treatment [168, 169].

    2. (b)

      The authors of this handbook have the following routine imaging regimen:

      1. (i)

        Initial follow-up MRA 6 months after the initial treatment, and then annually after that.

  4. 4.

    How long to follow?

    1. (a)

      Late recanalization of coiled aneurysms (>3–5 years after initial treatment) is uncommon but has been observed in 12.4% of cases [169].

      1. (i)

        Risk factors for recanalization include:

        • Aneurysm size >10 mm

        • Residual neck after initial treatment

        • Previous retreatment after the initial treatment

    2. (b)

      It is reasonable to continue annual surveillance imaging indefinitely in younger patients with significant risk factors for recanalization, and to consider discontinuing annual imaging in selected other patients, such as the elderly without major risk factors for recanalization.

    3. (c)

      Caveat: The authors of this handbook have seen rupture of aneurysms many years after discontinuing follow-up of apparently completely occluded aneurysms.

  5. 5.

    How about flow diverter cases?

    1. (a)

      Little data exists as of yet to determine the frequency and length of follow-up imaging for flow diverter-treated aneurysms. The rate of recanalization of flow diverter-treated aneurysms will likely turn out to be less than that for coiled aneurysms. The authors of this handbook obtain regular MRAs indefinitely; however, they space out imaging to every 2–3 years after the initial 18-month post-procedure period.

1.10 Indocyanine Green Videoangiography

Microscope-integrated indocyanine green (ICG) videoangiography is a useful imaging technique during aneurysm surgery [170, 171] and other kinds of neurosurgical procedures. ICG is a near-infrared fluorescent dye that binds tightly to plasma globulins and remains intravascular with normal vascular permeability. It has a half-life of 3–4 min and is eliminated exclusively by the liver. Following an IV injection of ICG, fluorescence is induced with a microscope-integrated light source with a wavelength of 700–850 nm and is imaged with a video camera. It is useful in aneurysm surgery to (1) check for complete exclusion of the aneurysm after clipping and (2) make sure that the adjacent parent vessels are still patent. ICG is only visible within exposed vessels in the surgical field; it cannot be visualized through tissue.

  1. 1.

    Additional applications: Aside from aneurysm surgery, ICG has been used in surgery for:

    1. (a)

      Dural arteriovenous fistulas [172]

    2. (b)

      EC-IC bypass [173]

    3. (c)

      Decompressive craniectomy for stroke [174]

    4. (d)

      Brain tumors [175, 176]

    5. (e)

      Spinal vascular lesions [177,178,179]

  2. 2.

    Devices and drug

    1. (a)

      The microscope (Zeiss Pentero) must be outfitted with the ICG videoangiography module (FLOW 800, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).

    2. (b)

      IC-Green™ (Akorn, Inc., Buffalo Grove, Il) comes in 25 mg vials. The drug contains 5% sodium iodine. It should not be given to patients with a history of adverse reactions to iodine or iodinated contrast media.

      1. (i)

        Dose: 25 mg per dose, one-size-fits-all.

      2. (ii)

        Alternative dose: 0.2–0.5 mg/kg; daily dose should not exceed 5 mg/kg [180].

  3. 3.

    Technique

    1. (a)

      Consent: Informed consent should include the risk of anaphylaxis (1 in 500) [181].

    2. (b)

      Just prior to completing the surgical exposure, have the anesthesiologist prepare the ICG.

    3. (c)

      Activate video recording on the microscope.

    4. (d)

      Inject the ICG.

    5. (e)

      Continue recording until the bolus of dye passes through the area of interest.

    6. (f)

      Alternatively, intra-arterial injection of ICG can be done during intraoperative angiography after clipping of the aneurysm [182]. The resulting images are brighter and clearer compared to images obtained with IV injection.

  4. 4.

    Tips

    1. (a)

      Repeat doses can be given 20 min or less after the most recent dose without significant residual fluorescence interference from the previous injection.

    2. (b)

      Oxygen saturation measurements may show falsely low values during the first pass of the drug [183].

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Harrigan, M.R., Deveikis, J.P. (2018). Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment. In: Handbook of Cerebrovascular Disease and Neurointerventional Technique. Contemporary Medical Imaging. Humana Press, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66779-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66779-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66777-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66779-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)