Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Innovations in Science Education and Technology ((ISET,volume 24))

Abstract

The present chapter concerns engineering education in higher education in a European context. It comprises two main strands: in the first, we present an overview of engineering education in Europe from historical and sociological perspectives, and in the second, we present country-specific examples of engineering education from three European countries—Denmark, Turkey, and the UK, representing three different traditions of engineering education. This chapter contributes to research on the cultural dimension of engineering education, while it may also inform stakeholders on the history, politics, and diverse practices in the European context. We provide a short comparison of the engineering education systems in Denmark, Turkey, and the UK across several criteria. We conclude these different European countries’ innovation levels may stem from their differences in their educational programs and teaching methods: diverse and interdisciplinary in Denmark and the UK and uniform and traditional in Turkey. Finally, we provide recommendations for policy makers, educators, and researchers based on our review.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See the list of accredited programs as of 2014, October, here: http://main.abet.org/aps/Accreditedprogramsearch.aspx

References

  • Akpinar, B. (2006). Mechatronics education in Turkey. Mechatronics, 16(2006), 185–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albu, A. (1980). British attitudes to engineering education: a historical perspective. In Technical innovation and British economic performance (pp. 67–87). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayvaz, B., Kusakci, A. O., & Borat, O. (2016). Quality Assurance and Accreditation Processes / Kalite Güvencesi ve Akreditasyon Süreçleri. New Turkish Journal/Yeni Türkiye Dergisi, Sayı, 88, s 921–928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlex, D. (2011). The STEM programme in England. In Positioning technology education in the curriculum (pp. 63–74). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, S. (2010). Principles of problem and project based learning: The Aalborg model. Retrieved from http://www.en.aau.dk/about-aau/aalborg-model-problem-based-learning/. Accessed 13 Jan 2015.

  • Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2009). Teaching for quality learning at university. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borat, O. (2009). Challenges facing higher education in the globalized world. Bahru: Invited presentation at the University President Forum for Global Academic Network. Bahru, Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borat, O. (2010). Improvements expected in education sector within the scope of lifelong learning. Journal of Projects, 4(4), 32–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borat, O. (2014). HR Development within the Turkish qualifications framework. New Turkish Journal, 528–539/Türkiye Yeterlilikler Çerçevesi Kapsamında İnsan Kaynaklarının Gelişimi, Yeni Türkiye Dergisi, s.528–539, Yeni Türkiye Stratejik Araştırma Merkezi, Ankara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çakır, M. T., Yelmen, B. (2011). Engineering education in Turkey. Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on new trends in education and their implications. Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi. Retrieved from http://iconte.org/FileUpload/ks59689/File/094..pdf. Accessed 13 Jan 2015.

  • Carberry, A. R., & Baker, D. R. (2018). The impact of culture on engineering and engineering education. In Y. J. Dori, Z. Mevarech, & D. Baker (Eds.), Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education (pp. 217–239). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamber of Mechanical Engineers. (2013). Üye profili araştırma raporu [A report on member profiles] [White paper]. Ankara: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, S. H., Delahousse, B., & Meganck, M. (2009). Engineering in context. Aarhus: Academica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corlu, M. S. (2013). Insights into STEM education praxis: An assessment scheme for course syllabi. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(4), 2477–2485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çorlu, M. A. (2013). Uzman alan öğretmeni eğitimi modeli ve görüşler [A white paper about teacher education theory and praxis]. Retrieved from http://tstem.com/. Accessed on 13 Jan 2015.

  • Corlu, M. S., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). Introducing STEM education: Implications for educating our teachers in the age of innovation. Education in Science, 39(171), 74–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danish Ministry of Education. (2014). Improving vocational education and training – Overview of reform of the Danish vocational education system [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.uvm.dk/vocational. Accessed on 13 Jan 2015.

  • Danish Society of Engineers [IDA]. (2009). Uddannelsespolitik for Ingeniørforeningen, IDA [Educational policy of the Danish Society of Engineers, IDA]. Retrieved from http://ida.dk/sites/prod.ida.dk/files/IDAs%20uddannelsespolitik%20160609.pdf. Accessed on 13 Jan 2015.

  • Danish Technological Institute, Centre for Policy and Business Analysis [DTI]. (2013). Den Danske Ingeniør 2020, Jobfunktioner og Kompetencekrav [White paper]. Retrieved from http://ida.dk/sites/prod.ida.dk/files/den_danske_ingenioer_2020_jobfunktioner_og_kompetencekrav_final_loe_sidk_0.pdf/. Accessed on 13 Jan 2015.

  • Ellström, P. E. (1997). The many meanings of occupational competence and qualification. Journal of European Industrial Training, 21(6/7), 266–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engineering Council. (2017). Retrieved from https://www.engc.org.uk/informationfor/students-apprentices-and-graduates/on 19th June, 2017.

  • European Accreditation of Engineering Programs. (2008). EUR-ACE framework standards for the accreditation of engineering programs [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.enaee.eu. Accessed 13 Jan 2015.

  • European Commission. (2014). Innovation union scoreboard 2014 [White paper]. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu. Accessed on 13 Jan 2015.

  • European Federation of National Engineering Associations [FEANI]. (2010). Educational policy [FEANI position paper]. Retrieved from http://www.feani.org/. Accessed on 13 Jan 2015.

  • European Society for Engineering Education [SEFI]. (2012). Engineering education and the Bologna Process [SEFI Position Paper]. Retrieved from http://www.enaee.eu/. Accessed on 13 Jan 2015.

  • European Society for Engineering Education [SEFI]. (2013). The knowledge triangle: Re-inventing the future. Finland: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freely, J. (2013). A history of Robert College. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graff, E., & Kolmos, A. (2007). Management of change: Implementation of problem-based and project-based learning in engineering. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, R. (2010). United States. Bernard M. Gordon MIT Engineering Leadership Program. UK approaches to engineering project-based learning. Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, R., & Crawley, E. (2010). Making projects work: A review of transferable best practice approaches to engineering project-based learning in the UK. Engineering Education, 5(2), 41–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • İnan, K. (2005). Mühendislik eğitiminde yeni yaklaşımlar ve Türkiye [New approaches to engineering education and Turkey] [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.emo.org.tr/ekler/4492cbe90fbdbf8_ek.doc. Accessed on 13 Jan 2015.

  • Jensen, H. P. (2000). Quality management: Danish engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 16, 127–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, U. (2007). Historical accounts of engineering education. In E. Crawley, J. Malmqvist, S. Östlund, & R. Brodeur (Eds.), Rethinking engineering education: The CDIO approach (pp. 216–240). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kaçar, M. (2007). Tersâne Hendesehânesi’nden Bahriye Mektebi’ne Mühendishâne-i Bahrî-i Hümâyûn [The Ottoman School of Naval Engineering: From ‘Geometry Room’ to Naval Academy]. Osmanlı Bilimi Araştırmaları: Studies in Ottoman Science, 9(1–2), 51–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaçar, M., Zorlu, T., Barutçu, B., Bir, A., Ceyhan, C. O., & Neftçi, A. (2012). İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi ve mühendislik tarihimiz [İstanbul Technical University and our history of engineering]. İstanbul: İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjersdam, F., & Enemark, S. (1994). The Aalborg experiment: Project innovation in university education. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundgreen, P. (2006). Engineering education in Europe and the U.S.A, 1750-1930: The rise to dominance of school culture and the engineering professions. Annals of Science, 47(1), 33–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Measuring, Selection and Placement Center [ÖSYM]. (2013). Öğretim yılı yükseköğretim istatistikleri [Higher education statistics] [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.osym.gov.tr. Accessed on 13 Jan 2015.

  • MÜDEK. (2013). Association for Evaluation and Accreditation of Engineering Programs. Application form for accreditation agencies –Authorisation to award the EUR-ACE® label [White Paper]. Retrieved from http://www.mudek.org.tr. Accessed 13 Jan 2015.

  • Nesin, A. (2014). 2023 için çok geç, belki 2073 [Too late for 2023; perhaps in 2073]. TÜSİAD Görüş, 85. Retrieved from http://www.stemtusiad.org. Accessed on 13 Jan 2015.

  • NTVMSNBC. (2013). En popüler mühendislik inşaat mühendisliği [Civil engineering is the most popular engineering]. Retrieved from http://www.ntv.com.tr/arsiv/id/25452921. Accessed on Jan 13, 2015.

  • Nurdoğan, A. M. (2009). Robert Koleji mühendislik okulu [Robert College engineering school]. Divan Disiplinlerarası Çalışmalar Dergisi, 14(26), 203–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford English Dictionary. (2010). Engineer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quality Board. (2017). Higher Education Quality Board. Law No.7033. Official Gazette date: 1 July 2017, No.: 30111, Ankara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramskov, J., (2012). Sådan vandt universiteterne kampen om at uddanne ingeniører [This is how universities won the quest of educating engineers] [White paper]. Retrieved from http://ing.dk/artikel/sadan-vandt-universiteterne-kampen-om-uddanne-ingeniorer-128561. Accessed on 13 Jan 2015.

  • Royal Academy of Engineering. (2017). Engineering an academy that works for all. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sevindik, T., & Akpınar, B. (2007). The effects of the changes in postmodern pedagogical paradigms on engineering education in Turkey. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(5), 561–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (2018). Reconsidering different visions of scientific literacy and science education based on the concept of Bildung. In Y. J. Dori, Z. Mevarech, & D. Baker (Eds.), Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education (pp. 65–88). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. E., & Dengiz, B. (2010). Women in engineering in Turkey: A large scale quantitative and qualitative examination. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(1), 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tantekin-Ersolmaz, S. B., Ekinci, E., & Sağlamer, G. (2012). Engineering education and practice in Turkey. Technology and Society Magazine, 25(2), 26–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • URAS. (2017). University Ranking by Academic Performence (URAS) in engineering area. Retrieved from http://tr.urapcenter.org/2011/2011_7_t8.php. Accessed on 25 Aug 2017.

  • U.S. Congress Joint Economic Committee. (2012). STEM education: Preparing for the jobs of the future [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.jec.senate.gov/. Accessed on 13 Jan 2015.

  • Varol, K., Borat, O., & Ceviz, E. (2013). Challenges facing higher education in the globalized world. Istanbul Commerce University Journal of Sciences, 12(23) 47–53/Küreselleşen Dünyada Yükseköğrenimde Karşılaşılan Güçlükler. İTİCÜ Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(23) 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Women’s Engineering Society. (2014). Statistics on women in engineering [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.wes.org.uk. Accessed on 13 Jan 2015.

  • Yetkiner, E. Z. (2010). Achievement and opportunity gaps in mathematics education in turkey compared to european union countries. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zengin, B. (2000). Women engineers in Turkey: Gender, education and professional life: A case study on METU. Unpublished master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zengin-Arslan, B. (2002). Women in engineering education in Turkey: Understanding the gendered distribution. International Journal of Engineering Education, 18(4), 400–408.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rea Lavi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Corlu, M.S., Svidt, K., Gnaur, D., Lavi, R., Borat, O., Çorlu, M.A. (2018). Engineering Education in Higher Education in Europe. In: Dori, Y.J., Mevarech, Z.R., Baker, D.R. (eds) Cognition, Metacognition, and Culture in STEM Education. Innovations in Science Education and Technology, vol 24. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66659-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66659-4_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66657-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66659-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics