Skip to main content

Examining Interaction Modality Effects Toward Engagement in an Interactive Learning Environment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Data Driven Approaches in Digital Education (EC-TEL 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10474))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 4978 Accesses

Abstract

The primary goals of interactive learning environments (ILEs) are to improve student engagement and learning outcomes. In this paper, we examine different tablet-based user interaction strategies within the domain of analytical geometry (i.e., the intersection of algebra and geometry) that supports active learning for math problem solving. From a learning technology view, we ground our work using cognitive engagement theory and apply usability to evaluate and further infer user engagement by using different interaction metaphors. We propose two ILE features: (1) self-constructed graphing, which provides a Cartesian coordinate interface so that students can graph toward a solution and (2) system-generated graphing, where the ILE automatically translates written algebraic equations into their geometric equivalents. We recruited 24 college students and conducted a 2 × 2 mixed factorial experimental design by varying two levels (with & without) for each condition (self-constructed & system-generated graphing). We found that these two features combined optimally increased student engagement and solving performance. More importantly, letting students control multi-modal user interactions (given the self-constructed graphing feature) should be provided before introducing automated user interactions (given the system-generated graphing feature).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moreno, R., Mayer, R.: Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 19, 309–326 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ritter, S., Anderson, J.R., Koedinger, K.R., Corbett, A.: Cognitive tutor: applied research in mathematics education. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 14, 249–255 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K.A., Marsh, E.J., Nathan, M.J., Willingham, D.T.: Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 14, 4–58 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Koedinger, K.R., Booth, J.L., Klahr, D.: Instructional complexity and the science to constrain it. Science 342, 935–937 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rau, M.A., Aleven, V., Rummel, N., Rohrbach, S.: Why interactive learning environments can have it all: resolving design conflicts between competing goals. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 109–118. ACM, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Henrie, C.R., Halverson, L.R., Graham, C.R.: Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: a review. Comput. Educ. 90, 36–53 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lim, C.P., Nonis, D., Hedberg, J.: Gaming in a 3D multiuser virtual environment: engaging students in science lessons. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 37, 211–231 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Anderson, A., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J., Leskovec, J.: Engaging with massive online courses. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 687–698. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guo, P.J., Kim, J., Rubin, R.: How video production affects student engagement: an empirical study of MOOC videos. In: Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale Conference, pp. 41–50. ACM, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sabourin, J.L., Lester, J.C.: Affect and engagement in game-based learning environments. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 5, 45–56 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Oviatt, S., Cohen, A., Miller, A., Hodge, K., Mann, A.: The impact of interface affordances on human ideation, problem solving, and inferential reasoning. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. (TOCHI) 19, 22 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mavrikis, M., Grawemeyer, B., Hansen, A., Gutierrez-Santos, S.: Exploring the potential of speech recognition to support problem solving and reflection. In: Rensing, C., de Freitas, S., Ley, T., Muñoz-Merino, Pedro J. (eds.) EC-TEL 2014. LNCS, vol. 8719, pp. 263–276. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11200-8_20

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ainsworth, S., Bibby, P., Wood, D.: Examining the effects of different multiple representational systems in learning primary mathematics. J. Learn. Sci. 11, 25–61 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rau, M.A., Aleven, V., Rummel, N.: Intelligent tutoring systems with multiple representations and self-explanation prompts support learning of fractions. In: AIED, pp. 441–448 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rau, M.A.: Enhancing undergraduate chemistry learning by helping students make connections among multiple graphical representations. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 16, 654–669 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Desmos|Beautiful, Free Math. https://www.desmos.com/

  17. Rau, M.A., Michaelis, J.E., Fay, N.: Connection making between multiple graphical representations: a multi-methods approach for domain-specific grounding of an intelligent tutoring system for chemistry. Comput. Educ. 82, 460–485 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brenner, M.E., Mayer, R.E., Moseley, B., Brar, T., Duran, R., Reed, B.S., Webb, D.: Learning by understanding: the role of multiple representations in learning algebra. Am. Educ. Res. J. 34, 663–689 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zeleznik, R., Miller, T., Li, C., LaViola, Joseph J.: MathPaper: mathematical sketching with fluid support for interactive computation. In: Butz, A., Fisher, B., Krüger, A., Olivier, P., Christie, M. (eds.) SG 2008. LNCS, vol. 5166, pp. 20–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-85412-8_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Chi, M.T., Wylie, R.: The ICAP framework: linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educ. Psychol. 49, 219–243 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Koedinger, K.R., Nathan, M.J.: The real story behind story problems: effects of representations on quantitative reasoning. J. Learn. Sci. 13, 129–164 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kang, B., Kulshreshth, A., LaViola Jr., J.J.: AnalyticalInk: an interactive learning environment for math word problem solving. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 419–430. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kang, B., LaViola Jr., J.J., Wisniewski, P.: Structured input improves usability and precision for solving geometry-based algebraic problems. Presented at the (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  24. David Gustafson, R., Frisk, P.D.: Elementary Geometry, 3rd edn. Wiley, Chichester (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A., Buchner, A.: G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Meth. 39, 175–191 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lund, A.M.: Measuring usability with the USE questionnaire. Usability Interface 8, 3–6 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Paas, F., Tuovinen, J.E., Tabbers, H., Van Gerven, P.W.: Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educ. Psychol. 38, 63–71 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Van Merriënboer, J.J., Ayres, P.: Research on cognitive load theory and its design implications for e-learning. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 53, 5–13 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Oviatt, S.: Human-centered design meets cognitive load theory: designing interfaces that help people think. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 871–880. ACM, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. Adv. Psychol. 52, 139–183 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Huntley, M.A., Marcus, R., Kahan, J., Miller, J.L.: Investigating high-school students’ reasoning strategies when they solve linear equations. J. Math. Behav. 26, 115–139 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mathan, Santosh A., Koedinger, Kenneth R.: An empirical assessment of comprehension fostering features in an intelligent tutoring system. In: Cerri, Stefano A., Gouardères, G., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2363, pp. 330–343. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). doi:10.1007/3-540-47987-2_37

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Grafsgaard, J.F., Wiggins, J.B., Vail, A.K., Boyer, K.E., Wiebe, E.N., Lester, J.C.: The additive value of multimodal features for predicting engagement, frustration, and learning during tutoring. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, pp. 42–49. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported in part by NSF Award IIS-1638060, Lockheed Martin, Office of Naval Research Award ONRBAA15001, Army RDECOM Award W911QX13C0052, and Coda Enterprises, LLC. We thank the ISUE lab members at UCF for their support as well as the anonymous reviewers for their helpful feedback.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bo Kang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kang, B., LaViola, J.J., Wisniewski, P. (2017). Examining Interaction Modality Effects Toward Engagement in an Interactive Learning Environment. In: Lavoué, É., Drachsler, H., Verbert, K., Broisin, J., Pérez-Sanagustín, M. (eds) Data Driven Approaches in Digital Education. EC-TEL 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10474. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66609-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66610-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics