Abstract
As mentioned previously in the primary sections of chapter one, there are several, and varied applications of neural networks in geophysics; here we give a short list of some of these applications:
-
Modeling of crustal velocity using Artificial Neural Networks (case study: Iran Geodynamic GPS Network (Ghaffari and Mohammadzadeh 2015)
-
Crustal velocity field modeling with neural network and polynomials, SIDERIS, M.G. (Ed.), Moghtased-Azar and Zaletnyik (2009)
-
Artificial neural network pruning approach for modular neural networks (Yilmaz 2013)
-
Modular neural networks for seismic tomography (Barráez et al. 2002)
-
Estimating one-dimensional models from frequency domain measurements
-
Quantifying sand fraction from seismic attributes using modular artificial neural networks
-
Borehole electrical resistivity modeling using neural networks
-
Determination of facies from well logs using modular neural networks (Bhatt and Helle 2002)
-
Inversion of self-potential anomalies caused by 2D-inclined sheets (Hesham 2009).
-
2D inverse modeling of residual gravity anomalies from Simple geometric shapes using Modular Feed-forward Neural Network (Eshaghzadeh and Hajian 2018)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Scaled conjugate gradient back propagation.
- 2.
FGS quasi-newton.
- 3.
Levenberg-Marquardt back propagation.
- 4.
Resilient back propagation.
- 5.
Adaptive learning rate back propagation.
- 6.
Gradient descent with adaptive learning back propagation
References
Abe C., Shimamura T., 2012, Iterative Edge-Preserving Adaptive Wiener Filter for Image Denoising, International 253 Journal of Computer and Electrical Engineering, 4(4), 503–506.
Abdelrahman E.M., Bayoumi A.I., and El-Araby H.M., 1991, A least-squares minimization approach toinvert gravity data, Geophysics 56, 1, 115–118.
Abdelrahman E.M., Bayoumi A.I., Abdelhady Y.E., Gobashy M.M., and ElAraby, 1989, Gravity interpretation using correlation factors between successive least-squares residual anomalies, Geophysics 54, 12, 1614–1621, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442629.
Abdelrahman E.M., and El-Araby T.M., 1993, A least-squares minimization approach to depth determination from moving average residual gravity anomalies, Geophysics 58, 12, 1779–1784, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443392.
Abdelrahman E.M., El-Araby T.M., El-Araby H.M. and Abo-Ezz E.R., 2001, A new method for shape and depth determinations from gravity data, Geophysics, 66: 1774–178.
Aghajani H., Moradzadeh A. and Zeng H., 2009, Estimation of depth to salt domes from normalized full gradient of gravity anomaly and examples from the USA and Denmark, Journal of Earth Science, 20: 1012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-009-0088-y.
Albora A.M., Uçan O.N. and Aydogan D., 2007, Tectonic modeling of Konya-Beysehir Region(Turkey)using cellular neural networks, Annals of geophysics, VOL. 50, N. 5,603–614, https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-3060.
Albora, A.M., Ucan O.N., Özmen A. and Ozkan T., 2001, Separation of Bouguer anomaly map using cellular neural network, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 46, 129–142, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0926-9851(01)00033-7.
Al-Garni M.A., 2009, Interpretation of some magnetic bodies using neural networks inversion, Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2, 175–184.
Barráez D., Garcia-Salicetti S., Dorizzi B., Padrón M., Ramos E., 2002, Modular neural networks for seismic tomography, 2002 IEEE, Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots, in: https://ucv.academia.edu/DanielBarraez.
Barton N., 2000, TBM Tunneling in Jointed and Faulted Rock, Balkema, Brookfield.
Beiki M., and Pedersen L.B., 2010, Eigenvector analysis of gravity gradient tensor to locate geologic bodies, Geophysics 75, 6, I37–I49, DOI:10.1190/ 1.3484098.
Bhatt A. and Helle H.B., 2002, Determination of facies from well logs using modular neural networks. Petroleum Geoscience, 8(3), 217–229(Expanded abstract presented in EAGE 64th conference and technical exhibitions-Florence, Italy).
Bhattacharya B.B. and Roy N., 1981, A note on the use of a nomogram for self-potential anomalies, Geophysical Prospecting, 29(1), 102–107, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1981.tb01013.x.
Bieniawski von P., Celada Tamames Z.T., Galera Fernandez B., J.M., Alvarez Hernandez, M., 2006, Rock masse excavability indicator: new way to selecting the optimum tunnel construction method, Tunnell. Underground Space Technol. 21 (3–4), 237.
Bowin C., E. Scheer, and W. Smith, 1986, Depth estimates from ratios of gravity, geoid, and gravity gradient anomalies, Geophysics 51, 1, 123–136, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442025.
Brown W. M., DA Yid, Grovest and Tamas d. Gedeon, 2003, An artificial neural network method for mineral prospectivity mapping: a comparison with fuzzy logic and bayesian probability metiiod, in :Geophysical applications of artificial neural networks and fuzzy logic, Sandham and Leggett,179-198. Springer Science + Business Media Dordrecht ISBN 978-90-481-6476-9 ISBN 978-94-017-0271-3 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0271-3.
Bruland A., 1998, Hard rock tunnel boring, Ph.D. Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim.
Büchi E., 1984, Einfluss Geologischer Parameter auf die Vortriebsleistung einer Tunnelbohrmaschine, PhD Thesis, University of Bern.
Busch J.M., Fortney W.G. and Berry L.N., 1987, Determination of lithology from well logs by statistical analysis. SPE Formation Evaluation 2, 412–418.
Butler D.K., 1984, Microgravimetric and gravity gradient techniques for detection of subsurface cavities, Geophysics 49(7), 1084–1096, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441723.
Chang H.C., Kopaska-Merkel D.C. Chen H.C. and Durrans S. R., 2000, Lithofacies identification using multiple adaptive resonance theory neural networks and group decision expert system. Computers & Geoscience 26, 591–601. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442946.
Chamoli, A., Srivastava R.P., and Dimri V.P., 2006, Source depth characterization of potential field data of Bay of Bengal by continuous wavelet transform, Indian J. Marine Sci. 35(3), 195–204.
Douglas I. Hart, 1996, Improving the reliability of first-break picking with neural networks, Annual Meeting, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 1662–1665.
Del Negro C., Greco F., Napoli R. and Nunnari G., 2008, Denoising gravity and geomagnetic signals from Etna volcano (Italy) using multivariate methods, Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics,15, 735–749, ww.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/15/735/2008.
Efron, B., and Tibshirani R.J., 1993, An Introduction to the Bootstrap, Chapman & Hall, London.
Elawadi, E., Salem A., and Ushijima K., 2001, Detection of cavities and tunnels from gravity data using a neural network, Exploration Geophysics, 32(4), 204–208, https://doi.org/10.1071/eg01204.
El-Kaliouby H.M. and Al-Garni M.A., 2009, Inversion of self-potential anomalies caused by 2D inclined sheets using neural networks, Journal of geophysics and engineering, 6, 29–34, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/6/1/003.
Eshaghzadeh A. and Kalantari. R.S., 2015, Anticlinal Structure Modeling with Feed Forward Neural Networks for Residual Gravity Anomaly Profile, 8th Congress of the Balkan Geophysical Society 5–8 October 2015, Chania, Greece.
Eshaghzadeh. A., 2011. Optimization of gravity anomalies due to folded structures of an oil field with parabolic density contrast. M.Sc. Thesis, Tehran University, Iran (in Persian, Unpublished).
Eshaghzadeh A. and Hajian A., 2018, 2D inverse modeling of residual gravity anomalies from Simple geometric shapes using Modular Feed-forward Neural Network, Annals of geophysics, 61(1), SE115(1-5), https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-7540
Fahlman S.E, 1989, Fast learning variations onback—propagation: An empirical study, In Proceedings of the 1988 Connectionist Models Summer School, 38–51.
Fahlman S.E and Lebiere C., 1990, The cascade-correlation learning architecture, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2, 524–532.
Farmer I.W. and Glossop N.H., 1980, “Mechanics of disc cutter penetration”. Tunnels .Tunnell. Int. 12 (6), 22–25
Gehring K., 1995, Leistungs -und Verschleissprognosen in maschinellen Tunnelbau, Felsbau 13 (6).
Ghaffari M.R. and Mohammadzadeh A., 2015, Modeling of crustal velocity using Artificial Neural Networks (case study: Iran Geodynamic GPS Network), Iranian Journal of Geophysics, 9(3), 91–103 (Abstract in English, Original: in Persian).
Gong Q.M. and Zhao, J., 2009,Development of a rock mass chara cteristics model for TBM penetration rate prediction, Int J Rock Mech Min Sci. 46(1), 8–18.
Graham P.C., 1976, Rock exploration for machine manufacturer, In: Bieniawski, Z.T. (Ed.), Exploration for Rock Engineering. Balkema, Johannesburg, 173–180.
Gravesen, P., 1990, Geological map of Denmark 1:50.000, Kortobladet 116I Thirsted, Geological basis datakort, Geological Survey of Denmark, Map series no.13.
Grêt A.A., E.E.Klingelé, Kahle H.G., 2000, Application of artificial neural networks for gravity interpretation in two dimensions: a test study, Bollettino Digeofisica teorica Edapplicata, 41(1), 1–20.
Gupta O.P., 1983, A least-squares approach to depth determination from gravity data, Geophysics 48(3), 357–360, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441473.
Hajian A., Zomorrodian H., Styles P., 2012, Simultaneous Estimation of Shape Factor and Depth of Subsurface Cavities from Residual Gravity Anomalies using Feed-Forward Back-Propagation Neural Networks, Acta Geophysica, 58(4), 317–33, https://doi.org/10.2478/s11600-012-0049-1.
Hajian A., Shirazi M, 2015, “Depth estimation of salt domes using gravity data through General Regression Neural Networks, case study: Mors Salt dome Denmark”, Journal of the Earth and Space Physics, 41(3), 425–438.
Hajian A., Rezazadeh Anbarani M., Mobarra Y., 2014, Comparison of neural networks, fuzzy - neural networks and finite element methods for the estimation of surface settlement due to tunneling in the Mashhad subway line 2, 2nd International Congress of Recent Advances in Engineering – Islamic Azad University – Khomeinishahr Branch, ICRAE2014.
Hajian A., Styles P., Zomorrodian H., 2011a, Depth Estimation of Cavities from Microgravity Data through Multi Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Interference Systems, 17th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Leicester, UK, 2011.
Hajian A., 2009, Detection of Hazardous subsidence by microgravity method through Artificial Neural Networks, 6th Annual Meeting of the Asia Oceania Geosciences Society, AOGS, Singapore.
Hajian A., 2004, Depth Estimation of Gravity Anomalies by Neural Network, M.Sc. Thesis, Tehran University, Iran (in Persian, unpublished).
Hajian A., 2008, Depth estimation of gravity anomalies by Hopfield Network. In: Proc. 5th Annual Meeting, AOGS: Asia Oceania Geosciences Society, Busan, Korea, Ext. Abstr. SE92-D3-PM2-P001.
Hajian A., Zomorrodian H., Lucas C., and Amini N., 2007, Detection of Subsurface Sinkholes Made by Earthquakes Through Artificial Neural Networks from Microgravity Data, International Earthquake Symposium, Kocaeli University, Turkey, October 22–24.
Hajian A., Ardestani V.E. and Lucas C., 2011b, Depth estimation of gravity anomalies using Hopfield Neural Networks, Journal of the Earth and Space Physics(Scopus), 37, 1–9.
Hassanpour J., Rostami J. and Zhao, J., 2011, A new hard rock TBM performance prediction model for project planning. Tunnell. Underground Space Technol. 26, 595–603.
Hesham E.L.K., 2009, Inversion of self-potential anomalies caused by 2D-inclined sheets using, Journal of geophysics and engineering 6, 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/6/1/003.
http://www.preventionweb.net/files/…/30411_2infoaboutearthquakegemmashhad.pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hopfield_network#/media/File:Energy_landscape.png.
Hughes, H.M., 1986, The relative cut ability of coal measures rock”. Min. Sci. Technol., 3, 95–109.
Imani M., You RJ. and Kuo C.Y., 2014, Caspian Sea level prediction using satellite altimetry by artificial neural networks, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 4(11), 1035–1042, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0287-z.
Jagannadha R. S., Rao R.P. and Radhakrishna M. I V, 1993, Automatic inversion of self-potential anomalies of sheet-like bodies, Computer Geoscience. 1961–73.
Jian F.X., Chork C.Y., Taggert I.J., McKay D.M. and Bartlett R.M., 1994, A genetic approach to the prediction of petrophysical properties. Journal of Petroleum Geology, 17, 71–88.
Jones LEA, 2010, L194 Ararat Seismic Survey, VIC, 2009. Stack and migrated SEG-Y seismic data and images for line 09GA-AR1. Geoscience Australia, Victoria.
Jorgensen F., Sandersen B. E. P., Auken E., Lykke-Andersen H. and Sorensen K., 2005, Contributions to the geological mapping of Mors, Denmark – A study based on a large –scale TEM survey, Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark, 52, 53–75.
Kaftan I., Sındırgı P. and Akdemir Ö., 2014, Inversion of Self Potential Anomalies with Multilayer Perceptron Neural Networks. Pure and Applied Geophysics 171:8, 1939–1949.
Kimiaefar R., Siahkoohi H.R., Hajian A., and Kalhor A., 2016, Seismic random noise attenuation using artificial neural network and wavelet packet analysis, Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 9(234),1–11.
Langer H., Nunnari G., and Occhipinti L., 1996, Estimation of seismic waveform governing parameters with neural networks, J. Geophys. Res. 101, B9, 20109–20118, https://doi.org/10.1029/96jb00948.
Li X., 2006, Understanding 3D analytic signal amplitude, Geophysics 71(2), 13–16, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2184367.
Lim J. S., 1990, Two-Dimensional Signal and Image Processing, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.
Lines L.R., and Treitel S., 1984, A review of least-squares inversion and its application to geophysical problems, Geophysical Prospecting, 32(2), 159–186., https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1984.tb00726.x.
Liu Y., Liu C. and Yang D., 2009, A 1D time-varying median filter for seismic random, spike-like noise elimination. Geophysics 74(1), 17–24.
Mair R.J. and Taylor R.N., 1997, Bored Tunneling in the Urban Environment, 14th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Hamburg, Rotterdam, 2353–2358
Masters T., 1993, Practical neural network recipes in C++: Academic Press, Inc.
McCormack M.D., Zaucha D.E., and Dushek D.W., 1993, First-break refraction event picking and seismic data trace editing using neural networks, Geophysics 58, 1, 67–78, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443352.
Mobarra Y. and Hajian A., 2013, Application of Artificial Neural Networks to the Prediction of TBM Penetration Rate in TBM-driven Golab Water Transfer Tunnel, International Conference on Civil Engineering Architecture & Urban Sustainable Development 27 & 28 November, Tabriz , Iran
Mobarra Y., Hajian A., Rezazadeh Anbarani M., 2013, Application of Artificial Neural Networks to the Prediction of TBM Penetration Rate in TBM-driven Golab Water Transfer Tunnel, International Conference on Civil Engineering Architecture, Tabriz, Iran, 120–126.
Moghtased-Azar K., and Zaletnyik P., 2009, crustal velocity field modeling with neural network and polynomials, SIDERIS, M.G. (Ed.), observing our changing Earth, International Association of Geodesy symposia, 133, 809–816.
Mohan N.L., Anandababu L., and Rao S.V.S., 1986, Gravity interpretation using the Mellin transform, Geophysics 51, 1, 114–122, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442024.
Murat M.E., and Rudman A.J., 1992, Automated first arrival picking: A neural network approach, Geophysical Prospecting, 40(6), 587–604, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1992.tb00543.x.
Murthy B.V.S., and Haricharan P., 1984, Self-potential anomaly over double line of poles—interpretation through log curves Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Earth Planet Sci. 93437–45
Murthy B.V.S., and Haricharan P., 1985, Nomograms for the complete interpretation of spontaneous potential profiles over sheet like and cylindrical 2D structures. Geophysics 50(11), 27–35.
Murthy I V R, Sudhakar K.S. and Rao P.R., 2005, A new method of interpreting self-potential anomalies of two-dimensional inclined sheets Computer Geoscience, 31661–5.
Nettleton L.L., 1976, Gravity and Magnetic in Oil Prospecting, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Oruç B., 2010, Depth estimation of simple causative sources from gravity gradient tensor invariants and vertical component, Pure Appl. Geophys. 167(10), 1259–1272, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-009-0021-4.
Osman O., Albora A.M. and Ucan O.N., 2007, Forward modeling with forced Neural Network for Gravity Anomaly Profile, Mathematical Geology 39, 593–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-007-9114-8.
Paul M.K., 1965, Direct interpretation of self-potential anomalies caused by inclined sheets of infinite extension Geophysics 30(4), 18–23.
Pavlis N., Kenyon S., Factor J., and Holmes S., 2008, Earth gravitational model. In SEG technical pro-gram expanded abstracts 27, 761–763.
Pantazis G. and Alevizakou E., 2013, The Use of Artificial Neural Networks in Predicting Vertical Displacements of Structures, International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 3(5),1–8.
Pedersen G.K., and Shurlyk F., 1983, The fur formation, a late Paleocene ash-bearing diatomite from northern Denmark, Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark, 32, 43-65.
Poulton M.M., Sternberg B.K., and Glass C.E., 1992, Location of subsurface targets in geophysical data using neural networks, Geophysics 57(12), 1534–1544, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443221.
Wu Q., Nakayama K., 1997, Avoiding weight-ill growth: cascade correlation algorithm with local regularization. Neural Networks, 1954–1959.
Rao B.S.R., Murthy I.V.R., and Reddy S.J., 1970, Interpretation of self-potential anomalies of some simple geometrical bodies Pure Appl. Geophys. 7860–77.
Rao, B.S.R., Murty, I.V.R., 1978. Gravity and Magnetic Methods of Prospecting. Arnold-Heinemann Publishers, New Delhi, India, 390.
Rao R. M., Babu H. and Sivakumar Sinha G., 1982, A Fourier transform for the interpretation of self-potential anomalies due to two-dimensional inclined sheet of finite depth, Pure Applied Geophysics, 120365–74.
Reid A.B., Allsop J.M., Granser H., Millett A.J., and I.W. Somerton, 1990, Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution, Geophysics 55(1), 80–91, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442774.
Rostami J., Ozdemir L., 1993, A new model for performance prediction of hard rock TBM. In: Proceedings of the Rapid Excavation and Tunnelling Conference. Chapter 50, Boston, MA, USA, 793–809.
Rostami, J., 1997, Development of a force estimation model for rock fragmentation with disc cutters through theoretical modeling and physical measurement of crushed zone pressure, Ph.D. thesis, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado, USA.
Roth G., and Tarantola A., 1994, Neural networks and inversion of seismic data, J. Geophys. Res. 99, B4, 6753–6768, https://doi.org/10.1029/93jb01563.
Roux BL. And Rouanet H., 2006, Geometric data analysis: from correspondence analysis to structured data analysis. Springer Science &Business Media, Dordrecht, 192–197.
Ryseth A., Fjellbirkeland H., Osmundsen I.K., Skålnes Å., and Zachariassen E., 1998, High-resolution stratigraphy and seismic attribute mapping of a fluvial reservoir: Middle Jurassic Ness Formation, Oseberg Field. AAPG Bulletin, 82, 1627–1651.
Salem A., Elawadi E., and Ushijima K., 2003a, Short note: Depth determination from residual gravity anomaly data using a simple formula, Comput. Geosci. 29(6), 801–804, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0098-3004(03)00106-7.
Salem A., Elawadi E., Abdelaziz A., and Ushijima K., 2003b, Imaging subsurface cavities from microgravity data using Hopfield neural network. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Recent Advances in Kyoto, RAEG2003, Expanded Abstracts, 199–205.
Sarzeaud O.M., LeQuentrec-Lalancette F. and Rouxel D., 2009, Optimal Interpolation of Gravity Maps Using a Modified Neural Network, Math Geosci, 41, 379–395, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-009-9214-8.
Sharma B., and Geldart L.P., 1968, Analysis of gravity anomalies of two dimensional faults using Fourier transforms, Geophysical Prospecting 16(1), 77–93, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1968.tb01961.x.
Song J. G., Zeng W. H., Xu Y. and Xu W. X., 2011, The Improvement of Neural Network Cascade-correlation Algorithm and its Application in Picking Seismic First Break, 73rd EAGE Conference and Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2011, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20149418.
Song J.G., Zeng W.H., Xu Y., Xu W.X., 2011, The Improvement of Neural Network Cascade correlation Algorithm and its Application in Picking Seismic, 2011, First Break 73rd EAGE Conference & Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC, Vienna, Austria.
Stanton A. and Sacchi M.D., 2014, Least squares migration of converted wave seismic data. CSEG Recorder 39(10), 48–52.
Styles P. and Hajian A., 2012, Generalized Regression Neural Networks for Cavities Depth Estimation using Microgravity Data, Case Study: Kalgorlie Gold, Near Surface Geoscience, 18th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Paris, France.
Styles, P., R. McGrath, E. Thomas, and Cassidy N.J., 2005, The use of microgravity for cavity characterization in karstic terrains, Quart. J. Eng. Geol. Hydrogeol. 38(2), 155–169, https://doi.org/10.1144/1470-9236/04-035.
Sundararajan N., Srinivasa Rao P., and Sunitha V., 1998, An analytical method to interpret self-potential anomalies caused by 2D inclined sheets. Geophysics 63(15), 51–5.
Thompson D.T., 1982, EULDPH: A new technique for making computer-assisted depth estimates from magnetic data, Geophysics 47(1), 31–37, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441278.
Tierra A. and de Freitas S., 2005, Artificial Neural Network: A Powerful Tool for Predicting Gravity Anomaly from Sparse Data. In: Jekeli C., Bastos L., Fernandes J. (eds) Gravity, Geoid and Space Missions. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, 29. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Weiss, S.M., and Kulikowski C.A., 1991, Computer Systems That Learn, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo.
Wu, Q., and Nakayama, K., 1997, Avoiding WeightIllgrowth: Cascade Correlation Algorithm with Local Regularization. Neural Networks, 1954-1959.
Yang H., Chen H.C. and Fang J.H., 1996, Determination of carbonate lithofacies using hierarchical neural networks. Intelligent Engineering Systems through Artificial Neural Networks 6, 481–486.
Yang, H. Z., Wang, W. N., & Ding, F., 2006, Two Structure Optimization Algorithm for Neural Networks. Information and Control, 35(6), 700-705.
Yilmaz M., 2013, Artificial Neural Networks pruning approach for geodetic velocity field determination Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas, 19(4), 558–573, http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1982-21702013000400003.
Zaknich A., 1999, Artificial Neural Networks: a research dominated engineering discipline: Centre for Intelligent Information Processing Systems (ClIPS), Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Univ. of Western Australia, (unpublished).
Zhang Y., and Paulson K.V., 1997, Magneto telluric inversion using regularized Hopfield neural networks, Geophysical Prospecting, 45(5), 725–743, DOI:10.1046/ j.1365-2478.1997.660299.x.
Zhongjin Y. and Zhongke Shi, 2004, Fast Approach for Cascade-Correlation Learning, Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 34(9), 114–118.
Zinkiewicz O.C .and Taylor R.L., 2000, The finite Elements, Fifth Edition, Volume1: The Bais, McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 0750650494.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1 of Chapter Two
The procedure of teaching algorithms for MLP networks consist of 4 steps: defining network architecture, defining parameters related to network and learning algorithm (iterations, maximum epoch number and etc., training the network and finally validating and simulating (generalizing) the trained network. This general process is illustrated in Fig. 2.109.
In the example described here, a synthetic noisy seismic CMP gather is chosen and the ability of ANN in random noise attenuation is shown in a simple manner.
As random noise components are supposed not to be predictable in adjacent traces, the logic used for attenuating random noise is based on attenuating whatever is not confirmed to be coherence data.
By comparing the elements of a 7 by 3 neighborhood data and by user’s decision, the network will be trained with some examples (14 training pairs are used here). In Fig. 2.110 the noisy data and the selected adjacent traces from trace No. 1 to No. 3 is illustrated. These three traces are selected for extracting training pairs. The expert knowledge is required here in order to make the decision for choosing best points for marking noise contaminated data as well as pure coherence data related points. The decision could take place as a number (0 for noisy and 1 for noise free points). It should be mentioned that as an advanced algorithm, partly noise contaminated data also should be present in the trained network but in this appendix, the simplicity of the algorithm was the priority. Selected pairs are chosen from trace No. 2 as the training points are supposed to be check in a 7 by 3 neighborhood.
After training the network, simulation process will be held. In doing so, the input will be the 7 by 3 neighborhood amplitude (as training input data) for each sample. Now, the weight for each sample could show whether the sample belongs to noise or coherence data space (as training output data).
The results of the Generalizing trained network will be a matrix that contains weights for all data. Denoised version of input data will be achieved by production of weights into noisy data. The results are shown in Fig. 2.111.
Appendix 2 of Chapter Two
Brief list of Training functions in Matlab’s NN Toolbox is presented in Table 2.47.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hajian, A., Styles, P. (2018). Prior Applications of Neural Networks in Geophysics. In: Application of Soft Computing and Intelligent Methods in Geophysics. Springer Geophysics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66532-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66532-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66531-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66532-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)