Using Augmentative and Alternative Communication for Human-Robot Interaction During Maintaining Habitability of a Lunar Base

  • Boris Kryuchkov
  • Leonid Syrkin
  • Vitaliy Usov
  • Denis IvankoEmail author
  • Dmitriy Ivanko
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10459)


The experience of the ISS missions has demonstrated that it is necessary to examine the potential of using robots assistants for maintaining a habitability of the space station and for improving the quality of life of cosmonauts in lunar missions. New manned space missions will be marked by a decrease in crew support from Earth. These conditions call for the new forms of Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) in order to manage the workload of crew members in context of using robots for maintaining habitability of the manned space complexes. Correct setting of the daily schedule of robots activities in space missions will contribute to decrease the operational time of cosmonauts for routine manipulations, including Housekeeping manipulations, searching and preparing means for Next Day’s Work, transfer cargo, food preparation, elimination of waste and others works. An Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) is a simple and clear variant of the HRI, designed to explain the meaning of the task for a robot. AAC is widely used for disabled persons with impairment in ability for communication skills, but in case of design HRI these techniques may be intended for the specification of tasks for robots on base of Ontology for Robotics. In accordance with AAC approach every schematic encodes for HRI may include the schedule time for job and its contents (or tools of necessity), as well as the conditions for initiating the activity or terminating it. This form of communication in the context of not-too-high intellectual capabilities of a robot (as a communication partner) may be considered as a practical approach in typical situations for fulfilling scenarios of daily activities in accordance with the 24-h schedules of the crew.


Human Robot Interaction (HRI) Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) Robot assistant Lunar base’s habitability 



The research is partially supported by state research № 0073-2014-0005.


  1. 1.
    Bodkin, D.K., Escalera, P., Bocam, K.J.: A human lunar surface base and infrastructure solution, September 2006. doi: 10.2514/6.2006-7336 (2006)
  2. 2.
    Falzon, P. (ed.): Cognitive Ergonomics: Understanding, Learning, and Designing Human-Computer Interaction. Academic Press, London (2015). 261 p.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moroz, V.I., Huntress, V.T., Shevelev, I.L.: Planetnye ekspeditsii XX veka [Planetary expeditions of the XX century]. Space Res. 40(5), 451–481 (2002). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Frame-like structures DynSoft.
  5. 5.
    Karpov, A., Ronzhin, A.: Information enquiry kiosk with multimodal user interface. Pattern Recogn. Image Anal. 19(3), 546–558 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kryuchkov, B.I., Usov, V.M.: The human-centered approach to the organization of joint activities of cosmonauts and an anthropomorphic robot-assistant on manned spacecrafts. Manned Spaceflight 3(5), 42–57 (2012). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lakoff, G.: Cognitive modeling. In: Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Language and Intelligence. pp. 143–184 (1996) (in Russian). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind (trans: George, L.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1987). ISBN 0 226 46804 6Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Minsky, M.: Frames for presentation of knowledge. Energiya, Moscow, 151 p. (1979) (in Russian). A Framework for Representing Knowledge (trans: Minsky, M.). MIT-AI Laboratory Memo 306, June 1974. Winston, P. (eds.) The Psychology of Computer Vision. McGraw-Hill, New York (1975, reprinted) (1974)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Petrenko, V.F.: Introduction to experimental psychosemantic: a study of forms of representation in ordinary consciousness, Moscow, 177 p. (1983) (in Russian)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pospelov, G.S.: Preface. In: Minskiy, M. (ed.) Frames for Presentation of Knowledge. Energiya, Moscow 151 p. (1978) (1987, in Russian)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yusupov, R., Kryuchkov, B., Karpov, A., Ronzhin, A., Usov, V.: Possibility of application of multimodal interfaces on a manned space complex to maintain communication between cosmonauts and a mobile robotic assistant. Manned Spaceflight 3(8), 23–34 (2013). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kryuchkov, B.I., Karpov, A.A., Usov, V.M.: Promising approaches for the use of service robots in the domain of manned space exploration. SPIIRAS Proc. 32(1), 125–151 (2014). doi: 10.15622/sp.32.9. (in Russian)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Boris Kryuchkov
    • 1
  • Leonid Syrkin
    • 2
  • Vitaliy Usov
    • 1
  • Denis Ivanko
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  • Dmitriy Ivanko
    • 4
  1. 1.Yu. Gagarin Research and Test Cosmonaut Training CenterStar CityRussia
  2. 2.State Region Social-Humanitarian UniversityKolomnaRussia
  3. 3.St. Petersburg Institute for Informatics and Automation of the Russian Academy of Sciences (SPIIRAS)St. PetersburgRussia
  4. 4.ITMO UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations