Skip to main content

Futurology, Allegory, Time Travel: What Makes Science Fiction Fascinating

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Fascination with Unknown Time

Abstract

Kai Wiegandt examines how science fiction generates fascination through its treatment of time, and begins with the genre’s evocation of the sublime. Turning to the example of Poul Anderson’s Tau Zero (1970), he then discusses the relationship between science fiction and futurology on the one hand and science fiction and allegory on the other. Drawing on the work of David Wittenberg and Fredric Jameson, he shows that Anderson’s use of time travel is a response not so much to Einstein’s physics but to a growing scepticism amongst science fiction writers of his era about the capabilities of science fiction itself. Tapping a previously neglected source of fascination, Anderson’s novel is exemplary in its use of time travel for an allegory of the 1960s.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Jameson’s example for the reassertion of the reality principle is the Strugatski brothers ’ novel Roadside Picnic, the model for Tarkovsky’s (quite different) film Stalker (see Jameson 2005: 74–76).

  2. 2.

    Science fiction’s reliance on thought experiments has led to the most influential alternative definition of the genre —speculative fiction.

  3. 3.

    Hard science fiction goes back to problem-solving stories that focus on plot, such as Edgar Allan Poe ’s “A Descent into a Maelstrom” (1841), in which the hero uses scientific knowledge to escape a maelstrom. Pointedly put, there is a zone of indeterminacy between today’s hard science fiction and the speculative scientific writing of, for example, research and development departments of big technology corporations.

  4. 4.

    “There’s no human difference between a million and a billion, or ten billion, light-years. The exile is the same” (TZ 132).

  5. 5.

    For the problem of finding visual and verbal equivalents of extremely long stretches of time, see Chap. 1.2 of this volume.

  6. 6.

    The life sciences have played a prominent part in science fiction, as progress in them is projected to affect longevity, intelligence and the brain, evolution, genetics, sexuality and reproduction, the environment and the biosphere (Slonczewski and Levy 2003: 175). Joan Slonczewski’s Daughter of Elysium (1993) deals with some people who age, while others are engineered for near-immortality. In the last decade, speculations by scientists and inventors about the feasibility of doubled lifespans, new theories of aging as illness, and calculations of potential biological immortality of humans have surpassed the speculations of many fiction writers (see Knell and Weber 2009: 25–73; Hülswitt and Brinzanik 2010). For a discussion of science fiction’s concern with extended lifespans (with a focus on Bruce Sterling’s Holy Fire), see Mangum (2002: 69–82).

  7. 7.

    A similar analogy is invited by two better known literary and filmic narratives: Kazuo Ishiguro ’s novel Never Let Me Go (2005) and Lars von Trier ’s film Melancholia (2011).

  8. 8.

    More or less direct invocation of religious questions and use of a religious register is common in science fiction where technological achievements suggest godlike power of the human. The tone surrounding in particular the question of immortality is often eschatological (Mendelsohn 2003b: 270).

  9. 9.

    The novel illustrates the illicit nature of drugs by featuring so-called dream boxes in which the crew can experience artificial but addictive rich sensory environments. Drugs or simulations of this sort are not a permanent solution.

  10. 10.

    Leonora Christine’s crew is multicultural to an extreme degree, and the ship has a female First Officer, but in contrast to multiculturalism, feminism remains a fiction rather than a reality in Tau Zero. “Woman is the nigger of the world,” Yoko Ono polemicised in 1968 in an interview with the women’s magazine Nova (Lennon made a song of it, published in 1972). Her diagnosis can also be applied to the multi-ethnic space ship, wherein the First Officer Ingrid Lindgren, the highest ranking female, finds that the best she can do for the ship is to comfort and pleasure the male engineers, scientists, or constables when they feel dangerously low.

  11. 11.

    A critical attitude towards science became common in New Wave science fiction after J.G. Ballard (Broderick 2003: 52).

  12. 12.

    It goes without saying that also in the 1960s, most science fiction writers continued writing novels that did not exhibit such scepticism; just as most writers writing during Modernism did not write in a modernist vein. After all, the Sixties included important writers as different as Robert Heinlein, Frank Herbert, J.G. Ballard , and Philip K. Dick. Broderick suggests an additional source of the new scepticism when he explains that the late fifties and early sixties saw the arrival of the first generation of science fiction writers who were influenced by Modernism, which was itself characterised by epistemological scepticism (2003: 49).

Bibliography

  • Anderson, Poul. 2006. Tau Zero. London: Gollancz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumbach, Sibylle. 2015. Literature and Fascination. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bester, Alfred. 2000 [1961]. A Diatribe Against Science Fiction. In: Redemolished. New York: ibooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinzanik, Roman, and Tobias Hülswitt (eds.). 2010. Werden wir ewig leben? Gespräche über die Zukunft von Mensch und Technologie. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broderick, Damien. 2003. New Wave and Backwash: 1960–1980. In The Cambridge Companion to Science Fiction, eds. Edward James and Farah Mendelsohn, 48–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, Edmund. 1987. A Philosophical Inquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, Marilyn J., and Lawrence H. Ganong (eds.). 2014. The Social History of the American Family: An Encyclopedia. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, Kathryn. 2003. Hard Science Fiction. In The Cambridge Companion to Science Fiction, eds. Edward James and Farah Mendelsohn, 86–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, Edward. 2003. Utopias and Anti-Utopias. In The Cambridge Companion to Science Fiction, eds. Edward James and Farah Mendelsohn, 219–229. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, Fredric. 2005. Archaeologies of the Future: The Desire Called Utopia and Other Science Fictions. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knell, Sebastian, and Marcel Weber (eds.). 2009. Länger leben? Philosophische und biowissenschaftliche Perspektiven. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lem, Stanislaw. 1970. Solaris. New York: Walker and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangum, Teresa. 2002. Longing for Life Extension: Science Fiction and Late Life. Journal of Aging and Identity 7 (2): 69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendelsohn, Farah. 2003a. Introduction: Reading Science Fiction. In The Cambridge Companion to Science Fiction, eds. Edward James and Farah Mendelsohn, 1–12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003b. Religion and Science Fiction. In The Cambridge Companion to Science Fiction, eds. Edward James and Farah Mendelsohn, 264–275. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, David. 1984. The American Technological Sublime. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorter, Edward. 2008. Before Prozac: The Troubled History of Mood Disorders in Psychiatry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slonczewski, Joan, and Michael Levy. 2003. Science Fiction and the Life Sciences. In The Cambridge Companion to Science Fiction, eds. Edward James and Farah Mendelsohn, 174–185. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Suvin, Darko. 1979. Metamorphoses of Science Fiction: On the Poetics and History of a Literary Genre. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittenberg, David. 2012. Time Travel: The Popular Philosophy of Narrative. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wiegandt, K. (2017). Futurology, Allegory, Time Travel: What Makes Science Fiction Fascinating. In: Baumbach, S., Henningsen, L., Oschema, K. (eds) The Fascination with Unknown Time. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66438-5_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics