Abstract
The project reported in this chapter aimed at assessing and fostering future teachers’ diagnostic competence in teaching and learning situations in which students’ errors occurred. Based on a model of diagnostic processes in error situations a university course and a pre- and post-test were developed. Probabilistic models (such as Item-Response-Theory and Latent-Class-Analysis) were used to assess the future teachers’ diagnostic competence in erroneous teaching and learning situations based on their answers to the test items. The results show that the university course had an influence on the way future teachers hypothesize about the causes of the students’ errors and partly also on their preferred way of dealing with errors. Additionally the importance of practical experience when fostering diagnostic competence in error situations became apparent.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abs, H. J. (2007). Überlegungen zur Modellierung diagnostischer Kompetenz bei Lehrerinnen und Lehrern. In M. Lüders (Ed.), Forschung zur Lehrerbildung (pp. 63–84). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
Ashlock, R. B. (2010). Error patterns in computation: Using error patterns to help each student learn (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Ball, D., Hill, H. C., & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching. American Educator, 29(1), 14–17, 20–22, 43–46.
Ball, D., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
Bell, A. (1993). Principles for the design of teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24, 5–34.
Borasi, R. (1996). Reconceiving mathematics instruction: A focus on errors. Norwood, OH: Ablex Pub.
Brown, J. S., & Burton, R. R. (1978). Diagnostic models for procedural bugs in basic mathematical skills. Cognitive Science, 2(2), 155–192.
Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 255–296). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Cooney, T. J. (1988). Teachers’ decision making. In D. Pimm (Ed.), Mathematics, teachers and children (pp. 273–286). London, UK: Hodder und Stoughton in association with the Open University.
Cooper, S. (2009). Preservice teachers’ analysis of children’s work to make instructional decisions. School Science and Mathematics, 109(6), 355–362.
Cox, L. (1975). Diagnosing and remediating systematic errors in addition and subtraction computations. The Arithmetic Teacher, 22(2), 151–157.
Doyle, W. (2006). Ecological approaches to classroom management. In C. S. Weinstein, C. M. Evertson, & J. E. Brophy (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management (pp. 97–125). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Heinze, A. (2004). Zum Umgang mit Fehlern im Unterrichtsgespräch der Sekundarstufe I. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 25(3/4), 221–244.
Heinrichs, H. (2015). Diagnostische Kompetenz von Mathematik-Lehramtsstudierenden. Wiesbaden: Springer Spektrum.
Hußmann, S., Leuders, T., & Prediger, S. (2007). Schülerleistungen verstehen –Diagnose im Alltag. PM: Praxis der Mathematik in der Schule, 49(15), 1–9.
Jäger, R. S. (2010). Diagnostische Kompetenz und Urteilsbildung als Element von Lehrprofessionalität. In O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, K. Beck, D. Sembill, R. Nickolaus & R. Mulder (Eds.), Lehrerprofessionalität (S. 105–116). Landau, Germany: Verl. Empirische Pädagogik.
Klug, J., Bruder, S., Kelava, A., Spiel, C., & Schmitz, B. (2013). Diagnostic competence of teachers: A process model that accounts for diagnosing learning behavior tested by means of a case scenario. Teaching and Teacher Education, 30, 38–46.
Mayring, P. (2010). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken (11th ed.). Weinheim, Germany: Beltz, Beltz Pädagogik.
Peterson, P. L., & Clark, C. M. (1978). Teachers’ reports of their cognitive processes during teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 15(4), 555–565.
Praetorius, A.-K., Lipowsky, F., & Karst, K. (2012). Diagnostische Kompetenz von Lehrkräften: Aktueller Forschungsstand, unterrichtspraktische Umsetzbarkeit und Bedeutung für den Unterricht. In R. Lazarides (Ed.), Differenzierung im mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Unterricht (pp. 115–146). Bad Heilbrunn, Germany: Klinkhardt.
Putnam, R. T. (1987). Structuring and adjusting content for students: A study of live and simulated tutoring of addition. American Educational Research Journal, 24(1), 13–48.
Radatz, H. (1980). Fehleranalysen im Mathematikunterricht. Braunschweig, Germany: F. Vieweg.
Reisman, F. K. (1982). A guide to the diagnostic of teaching of arithmetic (3rd ed.). Columbus, OH: C. E. Merrill.
Rheinberg, F. (1978). Gefahren Pädagogischer Diagnostik. In K. J. Klauer (Ed.), Handbuch der pädagogischen Diagnostik (pp. 27–38). Düsseldorf, Germany: Schwann.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2011). Toward professional development for teachers grounded in a theory of decision making. ZDM Mathematics Education, 43(4), 457–469.
Schoy-Lutz, M. (2005). Fehlerkultur im Mathematikunterricht: Theoretische Grundlegung und evaluierte unterrichtspraktische Erprobung anhand der Unterrichtseinheit “Einführung in die Satzgruppe des Pythagoras”. Hildesheim, Germany: Franzbecker.
Schrader, F.-W. (1989). Diagnostische Kompetenzen von Lehrern und ihre Bedeutung für die Gestaltung und Effektivität des Unterrichts. Frankfurt, Germany: Lang.
Schrader, F.-W. (2006). Diagnostische Kompetenz von Eltern und Lehrern. In D. H. Rost (Ed.), Handwörterbuch Pädagogische Psychologie (pp. 68–71). Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.
Schrader, F.-W. (2011). Lehrer als Diagnostiker. In E. Terhart (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Forschung zum Lehrerberuf (S. 683–698). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
Schumacher, R. (2008). Der produktive Umgang mit Fehlern: Fehler als Lerngelegenheit und Orientierungshilfe. In R. Caspary (Ed.), Nur wer Fehler macht, kommt weiter (pp. 49–72). Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany: Herder.
Seifried, J., & Wuttke, E. (2010). "Professionelle Fehlerkompetenz" – Operationalisierung einer vernachlässigten Kompetenzfacette von (angehenden) Lehrkräften. Wirtschaftspsychologie, 12(4), 17–28.
Shavelson, R. J., & Stern, P. (1981). Research on teachers’ pedagogical thoughts, judgements, decisions and behavior. Review of Educational Research, 51(4), 455–498.
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Smith, J. P., diSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115–163.
Son, J.-W., & Sinclair, N. (2010). How preservice teachers interpret and respond to student geometric errors. School Science and Mathematics, 110(1), 31–46.
Swan, M. (2001). Dealing with misconceptions in mathematics. In P. Gates (Ed.), Issues in mathematics teaching. London, UK: Routledge Falmer.
Tsamir, P. (2005). Enhancing prospective teachers’ knowledge of learners’ intuitive conceptions: The case of same A–same B. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(6), 469–497.
Türling, J. M., Seifried, J., & Wuttke, E. (2012). Teachers’ knowledge about domain specific student errors. In J. Seifried & E. Wuttke (Eds.), Learning from errors at school and at work (Vol. 1, pp. 95–110). Opladen, Germany: Budrich.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Heinrichs, H., Kaiser, G. (2018). Diagnostic Competence for Dealing with Students’ Errors: Fostering Diagnostic Competence in Error Situations. In: Leuders, T., Philipp, K., Leuders, J. (eds) Diagnostic Competence of Mathematics Teachers. Mathematics Teacher Education, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66327-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66327-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66325-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66327-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)