Skip to main content

Can Social TV Use Cultural Intermediation to Facilitate Participation?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cultural Intermediaries
  • 2715 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter predominately looks at user participation beyond access, and towards inclusive facilitation: a role suitable for cultural intermediation. The global screen industries have been experimenting with user participation for several years, based on broad cultural goals, which has also ignited broader media debates. The public service media (PSM) remit requires the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) to provide for minorities whilst fostering national culture and the public sphere. The remit of PSM and its impact on national and cultural policy, as scholars argue, is the reason for the significance of this burgeoning field, where PSM are positioned as cultural facilitating institutions: they provide the cultural voice of geographical region for both its citizens and as an exported cultural product. PSM’s role as a cultural institution is crucial within the field of comedy television. Social media platforms and projects, specifically ‘social TV’, have enabled greater participation in ABC content consumption and creation; they provide opportunities for social participation in collaborative cultural production. However, this chapter argues that instead of deconstructing boundaries, social media platforms may, in fact, reconstruct participation barriers within the co-creative production processes. This chapter documents the ABC co-creation between Twitter users and the #7DaysLater television programme, which is a narrative-based comedy programme that engaged its audience through social media to produce its weekly programme. The chapter argues why the ABC should engage in social media platforms to collaboratively produce content, with #7DaysLater providing an innovative example, but suggests skilled cultural intermediaries with experience in community facilitation should carry out the process. This chapter describes how cultural intermediation is the process of public service media organizations engaging digital influencers across social media to support authentic participation amongst a broader group of citizens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ABC. 2013. ‘#7Dayslater’. Retrieved 24 Apr. 2017, from http://www.abc.net.au/tv/programs/7dayslater.

  • ———. 2014. ‘Fat cow motel’. Retrieved 24 Apr. 2017, from http://www.abc.net.au/tv/fatcowmotel.

  • Al-Jenaibi, B. 2016. ‘The Twitter revolution in the Gulf Countries’. Journal of Creative Communications 11 (1): 61–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellman, S., J.A. Robinson, B. Wooley, and D. Varan. 2017. ‘The effects of social TV on television advertising effectiveness’. Journal of Marketing Communications 23 (1): 73–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, A., and J. Burgess. 2011. ‘The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics’. Paper presented at the The 6th European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) General Conference, University of Iceland, Reykjavik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpentier, N. 2009. ‘Participation is not enough: The conditions of possibility of mediated participatory practices’. European Journal of Communication 24 (4): 407–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Zúñiga, H.G., V. Garcia-Perdomo, and S.C. McGregor. 2015. ‘What is second screening? Exploring motivations of second screen use and its effect on online political participation’. Journal of Communication 65: 793–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flew, T. 2013. Global creative industries. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, C. 2014. Social media: A critical introduction. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giglietto, F., and D. Selva. 2014. ‘Second screen and participation: A content analysis on a full season dataset of tweets’. Journal of Communication 64: 260–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, T. 2010. ‘The politics of platforms’. New Media and Society 12 (3): 347–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graver, F. 2012. ‘90 days at Twitter: What I learned from the inside’. Paper presented at the Ad Age Social Engagement/Social TV Conference, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, S., T. Highfield. and A. Bruns. 2013. ‘More than a backchannel’. Participations: Journal of Audience & Reception Studies, 10 (1): 405–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, G. 2013. ‘Enacting public value on the ABC’s Q&A: From normative to performative approaches’. Media International Australia 146: 82–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuehn, K., and T. Corrigan. 2013. ‘Hope labor: The role of employment prospects in online social production’. The Political Economy of Communication 1 (1): 9–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, F. 2007. ‘Digital dilemmas: The Australian Broadcasting Corporation and interactive multimedia publishing, 1992–2002, PhD thesis, Southern Cross University, Lismore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napoli, P.M. 2011. ‘Exposure diversity reconsidered’. Journal of Information Policy 1: 246–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen. 2013. The State of mobile apps. San Francisco: Nielsen.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, T. and J. Battelle. 2009. ‘Web squared: Web 2.0 five years on’. Paper presented at the Web 2.0 Summit, San Francisco. Retrieved 21 Jan. 2017, from http://www.web2summit.com/web2009/public/schedule/detail/10194.

  • Oh, C., and S. Yergeau. 2017. ‘Social capital, social media, and TV ratings’. International Journal of Business Information Systems 24 (2): 242–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OzTam. 2016. More screens, choice and activities across devices: Q1 2016 Australian multi-screen report, Retrieved 24 April 2017, from http://www.oztam.com.au/documents/Other/Q1%202016%20Australian%20Multi-Screen%20Report%20release.pdf.

  • Senft, T.M. 2013. ‘Microcelebrity and the branded self’. In A companion to new media dynamics, ed. J. Hartley, and A. Bruns. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., and J.L. Boyles. 2012. The rise of the connected viewer. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project, Pew Research Center. Retrieved 24 April 2017, from http://www/pewinternet.org/2012/07/17/the-rise-of-the-connected-viewer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twitter. 2015. ‘New research: Twitter users love to watch, discover and engage with video’. Retrieved 24 Apr. 2017, from https://blog.twitter.com/2015/new-research-twitter-users-love-to-watch-discover-and-engage-with-video.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathon Hutchinson .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hutchinson, J. (2017). Can Social TV Use Cultural Intermediation to Facilitate Participation?. In: Cultural Intermediaries. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66287-9_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics