Skip to main content

Co-creation as the Basis for Cultural Intermediation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 2860 Accesses

Abstract

The introduction to this chapter outlines the incorporation of social media platforms and PSM globally. It then moves towards the background of the ABC and how they have incorporated social media platforms, co-creation and user participation historically since developing their online presence. The scholarship acknowledges that public service broadcasting has developed beyond the production and procurement of programming, to also include innovative public services distributed across a range of digital platforms and technologies. Further, globalization has an enormous impact on the policy and regulation aspect of public service media (PSM), especially with digital technologies and social media use as interactive tools for content production, where scholars are exploring concepts around a PSM 2.0 model. After introducing the ABC and PSM as a particular type of non-commercial media organization, this chapter outlines ABC Pool (abc.net.au/pool), a now defunct platform that was developed and facilitated by the ABC to enable users to contribute user-created content (UCC). This UCC was hosted on ABC supported servers, and in some instances, ABC long-form radio documentaries, web productions, gallery exhibitions and television productions used some of the more suitable contributions. Users could contribute content as audio, photography, video or text to themed projects that were mostly facilitated by Radio National producers, who would remix the contributions into 53-minute feature documentaries around that theme. Users also had the opportunity to create their own themed projects and co-create with the other ABC Pool users. The platform operated under a Creative Commons licensing system which enabled content to move seamlessly between mediums, for example, online to television, while maintaining the original contributor’s authorship. ABC Pool was one of the first user-created content sites of the ABC and challenged many of the Editorial Policies, the legislated regulatory framework under which the ABC operates. This case study demonstrates how the ABC experimented with user contributions included in co-creative production models and highlights emerging governance models that incorporate participatory production between institutions and audiences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • ABC. 2010. ‘360documentaries’. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/360/about/.

  • ABC. 2012. ‘ABC open’. Retrieved 7 February 2012, from http://open.abc.net.au.

  • ABC. 2013. ‘ABC pool’. Retrieved 24 April 2017, from http://www.abcpool.org.

  • Australian Broadcasting Corporation Act. 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, J. 2009. Co-creative expertise: Auran games and fury—a A case study. Media International Australia 130: 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BBC. 2017. ‘Your pictures’. Retrieved 24 April 2017, from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-10768282.

  • Bourdieu. 1984. A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, M. 2004. ‘ABC Online: Becoming the ABC’. Unpublished PhD thesis, Griffith University, Brisbane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, S. 2013. Hidden innovation: Policy, industry and the creative sector. Brisbane: University of Queensland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, C. 2011. ABC opening up regional libraries. Incite 11: 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R.M., R.I. Fretz, and L.L. Shaw. 1995. Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guardian. 2017. ‘GuardianWitness’. Retrieved 24 April 2017, from https://witness.theguardian.com.

  • Hammersley, M., and P. Atkinson. 1995. Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, F. 2007. ‘Digital dilemmas: The Australian Broadcasting Corporation and interactive multimedia publishing, 1992–2002’. PhD thesis, Southern Cross University, Lismore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negus, K. 2002. The work of cultural intermediaries and the enduring distance between production and consumption. Cultural Studies 16 (4): 501–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, E., L. Berkeley, and B. Murphet. 2012. ‘Community media and ethical choice’. 3C Media 6: 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia. 2017. ‘Nightwish’. Retrieved 24 April 2017, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nightwish.

  • YLE. 2017. ‘To nightwish with love’. Retrieved 24 April 2017, from http://yle.fi/aihe/to-nightwish/english.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathon Hutchinson .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hutchinson, J. (2017). Co-creation as the Basis for Cultural Intermediation. In: Cultural Intermediaries. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66287-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics