Advertisement

From Biopower to Empower – How to Get Plump, or Why Do We Choose What We Choose?

  • Ignaas DevischEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Advancing Global Bioethics book series (AGBIO, volume 8)

Abstract

With concepts like ‘governmentality’, ‘pastoral power’ or ‘population’, in his later lectures on biopolitics, Michel Foucault attempted to conceive the question how the care for public health became indeed a central task and for politics and for all of us. Health is not only on the political agenda of many governments (governmentality), it’s presence runs as an bioimperative through the whole of society. It appeals to all of us (a totalizing technique) and to each one of us (individualized). There is obviously something wrong with us (pastoral power) if we don’t obey the imperative. I apply his analysis to the contemporary discourse on health promotion, the growing interest of the government and insurance companies in our daily activities and their attempt to interfere in it. Analysing the case of obesity, I will explore how the discourse on patient empowerment is actually the ethico-medical way through which people are governed. Far from a neutral plead, patient empowerment puts the individual responsibility for our health right at the centre of today’s medical discourse. Being unhealthy has become the synonym for not having done enough. It is therefore no coincidence that today, public health, especially in industrialised countries, has also become a question of having no longer access to the health insurance due to ‘bad behaviour’, of being excluded from health facilities, of food industry trying to get a grip on our food habits and tastes with food supplements, etcetera. What we are dealing with today – public health as an explicit task of contemporary politics – not only can be understood as the culmination of an ongoing process of government of our daily life out of a medical perspective; it is also an explicit political evolution which needs to be made explicit, in order to understand the biopolitical ideology behind it.

Keywords

Foucault Biopower Governmentality Obesity Public health Risk 

Notes

Acknowledgements and Conflicts of Interest

This invited article has drawn indirectly and in the last section verbatim on the content of the previously published paper ‘FOUCAULT AT THE BEDSIDE: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF EMPOWERING A HEALTHY LIFESTYLE ‘((2015) Devisch, Ignaas and Vanheule Stijn, Foucault at the bedside: a critical analysis of empowering a healthy lifestyle. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. Doi: 10.111/jep.12329). This derivation has been utilized to re-present and emphasize previously articulated observations, opinions and contentions. The author of the current paper declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Alemanno, A., and I. Carreno. 2011. Fat taxes in the European Union between fiscal austerity and the fight against obesity. European Journal of Risk Regulation 4.Google Scholar
  2. Bishop, J.P., and F. Jotterand. 2006. Bioethics as biopolitics. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (3): 205–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burchell, G., C. Gordon, and Peter Miller. 1991. The Foucault effect. Studies in governmentality with two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Butler, J. 2002. What is critique? On Foucault’s virtue. In The political, ed. D. Ingram. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Ciccarelli, R. 2008. Reframing political freedom in the analytics of governmentality. Law and Critique 19 (3): 307–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davey, R.C., and R. Stanton. 2004. The obesity epidemic: Too much food for thought? British Journal of Sports Medicine 38 (3): 360–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Devisch, I., and M. Deveugele. 2010. Lifestyle: Bioethics at a critical juncture. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (4): 550–558. doi: 10.1017/s0963180110000502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elias, N. 1995. Über den Prozess der Zivilisation. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  9. Elliott, C. 1999. A philosophical disease: Bioethics, culture and identity. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Erhart, M., N. Wille, and U. Ravens-Sieberer. 2008. Empowerment of children and adolescents – The role of personal and social resources and personal autonomy for subjective health. Gesundheitswesen 70 (12): 721–729. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1103261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fahlquist, J.N. 2006. Responsibility ascriptions and public health problems. Journal of Public Health 14 (1): 15–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feiring, E. 2008. Lifestyle, responsibility and justice. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (1): 33–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Foucault, M. 2007. Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–1978. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Gagnon, M., R. Hibert, M. Dube, and M.F. Dubois. 2006. Development and validation of an instrument measuring individual empowerment in relation to personal health care: The Health Care Empowerment Questionnaire (HCEQ). American Journal of Health Promotion 20 (6): 429–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gilbert, T. 2001. Reflective practice and clinical supervision: Meticulous rituals of the confessional. Journal of Advanced Nursing 36 (2): 199–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Han, B.-C. 2011. Topologie der Gewalt. Berlin: Matthes & Seitz.Google Scholar
  17. Holmes, D. 2002. Police and pastoral power: Governmentality and correctional forensic psychiatric nursing. Nursing Inquiry 9 (2): 84–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Horkheimer, M., and T. Adorno. 1996. Dialektik der Aufklärung. Philosophische fragmente. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Wissenschaft.Google Scholar
  19. Huibers, A.K., and A. Spijker. 1998. The autonomy paradox: Predictive genetic testing and autonomy: Three essential problems. Patient Education and Counseling 35 (1): 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson, S.B., and S.G. Millstein. 2003. Prevention opportunities in health care settings. The American Psychologist 58 (6–7): 475–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kligler, B. 2007. Patient empowerment: Taking integrative medicine to the next level. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 13 (2): 189–190. doi: 10.1089/acm.2006.6343.Google Scholar
  22. Loukanova, S.N., and J.F.P. Bridges. 2008. Empowerment in medicine: An analysis of publication trends 1980–2005. Central European Journal of Medicine 3 (1): 105–110. doi: 10.2478/s11536-007-0066-7.Google Scholar
  23. Lynch, J. 2004. Foucault on targets. Journal of Health Organization and Management 18 (2–3): 128–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Machiavelli, N. 1981. The prince. Harmondworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  25. McNay, L. 1994. Foucault. A critical introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  26. Mola, E., J.A. De Bonis, and R. Giancane. 2008. Integrating patient empowerment as an essential characteristic of the discipline of general practice/family medicine. The European Journal of General Practice 14 (2): 89–94. doi:903051824 [pii] 10.1080/13814780802423463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moran, J., H. Bekker, and G. Latchford. 2008. Everyday use of patient-centred, motivational techniques in routine consultations between doctors and patients with diabetes. Patient Education and Counseling 73 (2): 224–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Murray, S. 2008. Pathologizing “fatness”: Medical authority and popular culture. Sociology of Sport Journal 25 (1): 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nirschl, R.P. 1999. Patient empowerment: Individual control of health benefits. Orthopedics 22 (8): 727–728.Google Scholar
  30. Rose, N. 1990. Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  31. ———. 1996. The death of the social? Re-figuring the territory of the government. Economy and Society 25 (3): 327–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Salmon, P., and G.M. Hall. 2003. Patient empowerment and control: A psychological discourse in the service of medicine. Social Science & Medicine 57 (10): 1969–1980. doi:S0277953603000637 [pii].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Santiago, L.E., C. Santiago, J. Texidor, G. Montalvo, and A.Y. Rivera. 2003. Social participation and community empowerment in public health. Puerto Rico Health Sciences Journal 22 (1): 39–41.Google Scholar
  34. Silvers, A. 2007. Predictive genetic testing: Congruence of disability insurers’ interests with the public interest. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 35 (s2): 52–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tam, P.K.H. 2008. Towards predictive, preventive, and personalized paediatric surgery. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 43 (2): 267–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tanumihardjo, S.A., C. Anderson, M. Kaufer-Horwitz, L. Bode, N.J. Emenaker, A.M. Haqq, et al. 2007. Poverty, obesity, and malnutrition: An international perspective recognizing the paradox. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 107 (11): 1966–1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ter Meulen, R., and F. Jotterand. 2008. Individual responsibility and solidarity in European health care: Further down the road to two-tier system of health care. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33 (3): 191–197. doi:jhn012 [pii] 10.1093/jmp/jhn012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ter Meulen, R., and H. Maarse. 2008. Increasing individual responsibility in Dutch health care: Is solidarity losing ground? The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33 (3): 262–279. doi:jhn011 [pii] 10.1093/jmp/jhn011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Verhaeghe, P. 2014. What about me?: The struggle for identity in a market-based society. Brunswick: Scribe.Google Scholar
  40. Wolf, S.M., and J.P. Kahn. 2007. Genetic testing and the future of disability insurance: Ethics, law & policy. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 35 (s2): 6–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wyatt, S., K. Winters, and P. Dubbert. 2006. Overweight and obesity: Prevalence, consequences, and causes of a growing public health problem. American Journal of the Medical Sciences 331 (4): 166–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zanker, C., and M. Gard. 2008. Fatness, fitness, and the moral universe of sport and physical activity. Sociology of Sport Journal 25 (1): 48–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ghent UniversityGentBelgium

Personalised recommendations