Advertisement

Folding Nature Back Upon Itself: Aristotle and the Rebirth of Physis

  • Marjolein Oele
Chapter
Part of the Contributions To Phenomenology book series (CTPH, volume 92)

Abstract

“Folding Nature Back Upon Itself: Aristotle and the Rebirth of Physis,” confronts us with nature’s receding presence and proposes to think through a rebirth of physis. Following Aristotle’s concept of physis, this paper locates two axes along which such a rethinking of physis can take place. The first axis is vertical, and turns around the fundamental tension that each natural being faces in seeking to overcome its own matter in order to reach transcendence. The second axis is horizontal, and follows Aristotle’s ideas that physis cannot unfold unless aided, stimulated, nurtured and enforced by external factors such as one’s environment, food, art, technology, and politics. This paper argues that vertical transcendence needs to be rethought to accommodate earthy, individual natural flourishing. Horizontal transcendence (e.g. rethinking the collaboration between different species and the collaboration between art and nature) may allow physis the kind of vertical transcendence that leads to its rebirth. This has important implications for both restoration projects and de-extinction projects: we need to acknowledge the role of human design for restoration and conservation projects, and envision humans no longer as external and superior to eco-systems, but as part of them. Only within newly conceptualized social-ecological systems can such a new vision of physis take flight.

Bibliography

  1. Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life (D. Heller-Roazen, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Agamben, G. (1999). Potentialities: Collected essays in philosophy (D. Heller-Roazen, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Aristotle. (1936) 1995. On the soul (W. S. Hett, Trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Aristotle. (1979). Aristotle’s metaphysics (H.G. Apostle, Trans.). Grinnell: The Peripatetic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Aristotle. (1984). Magna Moralia. In J. Barnes (Ed.), Aristotle, The complete works of Aristotle. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Aristotle. (1998). Aristotle’s physics: A guided study (J. Sachs, Trans.). New Brunswick/London: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Aristotle. (1999). Aristotle’s metaphysics (J. Sachs, Trans.). Santa Fe: Green Lion Press.Google Scholar
  8. Aristotle. (2001). On the soul and on memory and recollection (J. Sachs, Trans.). Santa Fe: Green Lion Press.Google Scholar
  9. Aristotle. (2012). Politics (C. D. C. Reeve, Trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  10. Baracchi, C. (2008). Aristotle’s ethics as first philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Brogan, W. A. (2006). The Intractable Relationship of Physis and Technē. In D. Hyland & J. P. Manoussakis (Eds.), Heidegger and the greeks: Interpretive essays. Bloomington-Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Calvert, J. (2014). Time as critique. In A. D. Ginsberg et al. (Eds.), Synthetic aesthetics: Investigating synthetic biology’s designs on nature (pp. 205–21). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Costache, A. (2016). Gadamer and the question of understanding: Between Heidegger and Derrida. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  14. Cronon, W. (1996). Uncommon ground: Rethinking the human place in nature. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  15. Derrida, J. (2005). Rogues: Two essays on reason. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Despret, V. (2004). The body we care for: Figures of Anthropo-Zoo-Genesis. Body and Society, 10(2-3), 111–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Foley, J. (2013). It’s time to rethink America’s corn system. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/time-to-rethink-corn. Accessed 9 May 2017.
  18. Foster, S. (2002). Aristotle and the environment. Environmental Ethics, 24(4), 409–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gadamer, H.-G. (1980). Dialogue and Dialectic: Eight Hermeneutical Studies on Plato. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Ginsberg, et al. (2014). Synthetic aesthetics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Goodall, J., McAvoy, G., & Hudson, G. E. (2005). Harvest for hope: A guide to mindful eating. New York: Warner Books.Google Scholar
  22. Grosz, E. A. (1999). Becomings: Explorations in time, memory, and futures. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hadot, P. (2006). The veil of isis: An essay on the history of the idea of nature (M. Chase, Trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  24. Heidegger, M. (1977a). The question concerning technology. In D. F. Krell (Ed.), Basic writings, (W. Lovitt, Trans., pp. 307–342). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  25. Heidegger, M. (1977b). Building, dwelling, thinking: In D. F. Krell (Ed.), Basic writings (W. Lovitt, Trans., pp. 343–364). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  26. Heidegger, M. (1998). On the essence and concept of Physis in Aristotle’s Physics: B.1. In W. McNeill (Ed.), Pathmarks (pp. 183–238). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Higgs, E. (2003). Nature by design: People, natural process, and ecological restoration. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Höffe, O. (2003). Aristotle (C. Salazar, Trans.). Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  29. Kant, I. (1987). Critique of judgment (W. S. Pluhar, Trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett Pub. Co.Google Scholar
  30. Latour, B. (2004). Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Oele, M. (2018). Aristotle on physis: Analyzing the inner ambiguities and transgression of nature. In E. Sanday & S. Kirkland (Eds.), Companion to ancient philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Ramirez, K. S., Leff J. W., Barberán A., Bates S. T., Betley J., et al. (2014). Biogeographic patterns below ground diversity in New York City’s Central Park are similar to those observed globally. In Proceedings: Royal Society of London B. 281.Google Scholar
  33. Reale, G. (1990). A history of ancient philosophy. Volume II. Plato and Aristotle. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  34. Sallis, J. (1994). Stone. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Society for Ecological Restoration. (2002). Official definition. www.ser.org. Accessed 9 May 2017.
  36. Spirn, A. W. (1996). Constructing nature. In W. Cronon (Ed.), Uncommon ground: Rethinking the human place in nature. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  37. Stockholm Resistance Centre. (2015). Applying resilience thinking. http://www.stockholmresilience.org/research/research-news/2015-02-19-applying-resilience-thinking.html. Accessed 9 May 2017.
  38. Sustainable Table. (2017). Industrial crop production. http://www.sustainabletable.org/804/industrial-crop-production. Accessed 9 May 2017.
  39. Van Dooren, T. (2014). Flight ways: Life and loss at the edge of extinction. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Ward, J. K. (2005). Aristotle on Physis: Human nature in the ethics and politics. Polis: The Journal of the Society for Greek Political Thought., 22(2), 287–308.Google Scholar
  41. Wieland, W. (1970). Die aristotelische Physik. Göttingen: Vanden Hoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
  42. Xenophon. (1994). Oeconomicus: A social and historical commentary (Sarah B. Pomeroy, Trans.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations